What do you think?
Le grand écart (La Bleue)
N'ayant pas l'apparence qu'il eut souhaitee, ne repondant pas au type ideal qu'il se formait d'un jeune homme, Jacques n'essayait plus de rejoindre ce type dont il se trouvait trop loin. Il enrichissait faiblesses, tics et ridicules jusqu'a les sortir de la gene. Il les portait, volontiers, au premier plan. A cultiver une terre ingrate, a forcer, a embellir de mauvaises herbes, il avait pris quelque chose de dur qui ne s'accordait guere avec sa douceur. Ainsi, de mince qu'il etait, s'etait-il fait maigre; de nerveux, ecorche vif. Coiffant difficilement une chevelure jaune plantee en tous sens, il la portait hirsute.
Dans ce roman ecrit en 1923, Jean Cocteau mele tendresse, humour et legerete, comme pour un pastiche. Mais derriere ces pirouettes et ces clins d'oeil, se cache un sourire plus grave.
Le texte est illustre d'une vingtaine de dessins de l'artiste, qui ponctuent avec poesie et drolerie les scenes du livre.
Dans ce roman ecrit en 1923, Jean Cocteau mele tendresse, humour et legerete, comme pour un pastiche. Mais derriere ces pirouettes et ces clins d'oeil, se cache un sourire plus grave.
Le texte est illustre d'une vingtaine de dessins de l'artiste, qui ponctuent avec poesie et drolerie les scenes du livre.
142 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1921
About the author
Jean Cocteau
568 books930 followersJean Maurice Eugène Clément Cocteau (5 July 1889 – 11 October 1963) was a French poet, novelist, dramatist, designer, boxing manager, playwright and filmmaker. Along with other Surrealists of his generation (Jean Anouilh and René Char for example) Cocteau grappled with the "algebra" of verbal codes old and new, mise en scène language and technologies of modernism to create a paradox: a classical avant-garde. His circle of associates, friends and lovers included Jean Marais, Henri Bernstein, Colette, Édith Piaf, whom he cast in one of his one act plays entitled Le Bel Indifferent in 1940, and Raymond Radiguet.
His work was played out in the theatrical world of the Grands Theatres, the Boulevards and beyond during the Parisian epoque he both lived through and helped define and create. His versatile, unconventional approach and enormous output brought him international acclaim.
His work was played out in the theatrical world of the Grands Theatres, the Boulevards and beyond during the Parisian epoque he both lived through and helped define and create. His versatile, unconventional approach and enormous output brought him international acclaim.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 30 reviews
Read
October 25, 2013 The Miscreant , by Jean Cocteau
Jean Cocteau (1889-1963) wrote Le grand écart in 1923, shortly before he started Thomas l'imposteur and already under the influence of Raymond Radiguet (please see my review of Thomas l'imposteur for further background:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... ),
so this novel, too, is an emotionally reserved narration in the style of the psychologizing and moralizing classic French authors of the 17th and 18th centuries and has many autobiographical elements. Cocteau always had a poet's eye, and it makes itself apparent in this text. He amuses himself and the reader with word play in this book, written with the serene elegance of his mid-period style. The story is not told quite as linearly and simply as it was in Thomas l'imposteur , and there are layers of irony, at least initially. There is also a heavy sprinkling of striking metaphors, such as
(An ornate state fair shooting stand, in pieces, that's Venice by day. By night, she is a passionate Negress, dead in the bathtub wearing her cheap trinkets.)
which may not be everyone's cup of tea; but I like them, even though I am not at all certain what these metaphors are trying to communicate besides "ornate", "in ruins", "tawdry".
Jacques Forestier is a young and skinny bisexual who loves to do the opposite of what one expects, but always with a little twist. Those aspects of himself he finds unattractive, he emphasizes. Despising the kind of superiority which always pretends the negation of whatever the received opinion is, he adopts the received opinion, but modifies it so that those who share the received opinion don't recognize it. Jacques has an animal elegance, an artificial naturalness, is an aristocratic man of the people who despises the aristocrats and the people. Politically, he wants to be at the point where the extreme right touches the extreme left... So, you see, Cocteau is having some fun with Jacques. Jacques arranges to be wherever everybody else is not and, from that vantage point, observes all. This is all quickly forgotten.
Poor little Jacques is lonely and in heat, so he must go to where other people are, at least physically. As in Le livre blanc
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
the search for love doesn't go very well for him, but for different reasons. The same is true for the little band of colorful, somewhat unlikely young characters thrown together by chance, straight, bi, gay. But this book has a great deal more charm and spirit than Le livre blanc . It is full of the witty little formules I enjoy reading:
(She resembled Germaine like the plaster cast does the original marble. That's to say they were alike, except in every way.) There's no way to reproduce this little bijou in English, sorry.
The core of the book is the relationship between Jacques and Germaine, which has the same structure as one of the relationships of the protagonist in Le livre blanc - she is an "actress" being kept by an older, rich man and Jacques catches her in bed with her girl friend. Unlike Le livre blanc, the story in this book is told with some sympathy and warmth; the initial irony of the opening is dropped while Cocteau revisits his own memories. In fact, the young Cocteau had such a relationship, and it apparently made quite an impression on him since he revisited it multiple times in his work.
Though this is a rather unusual love story, the emotions, the blindness, the obsession felt during the first love of a young man are the same here as in "normal" stories. The total paralysis when he realizes that it is over and all of his senses stop functioning, then the flood of incredible pain, denial, pain. And the distance between such emotions and those of a much more experienced person - in this case Germaine - is real and well evoked. This is the grand écart of the title. Behind it all, Cocteau demonstrates that while all relationships are accidental, their outcomes are inevitable.
There is yet more to this richly endowed little book. You really should consider reading it.
Jean Cocteau (1889-1963) wrote Le grand écart in 1923, shortly before he started Thomas l'imposteur and already under the influence of Raymond Radiguet (please see my review of Thomas l'imposteur for further background:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... ),
so this novel, too, is an emotionally reserved narration in the style of the psychologizing and moralizing classic French authors of the 17th and 18th centuries and has many autobiographical elements. Cocteau always had a poet's eye, and it makes itself apparent in this text. He amuses himself and the reader with word play in this book, written with the serene elegance of his mid-period style. The story is not told quite as linearly and simply as it was in Thomas l'imposteur , and there are layers of irony, at least initially. There is also a heavy sprinkling of striking metaphors, such as
Un somptueux tir de foire, en miettes, c'est Venise le jour. La nuit, elle est une négresse amoureuse, morte au bain avec ses bijoux de pacotille.
(An ornate state fair shooting stand, in pieces, that's Venice by day. By night, she is a passionate Negress, dead in the bathtub wearing her cheap trinkets.)
which may not be everyone's cup of tea; but I like them, even though I am not at all certain what these metaphors are trying to communicate besides "ornate", "in ruins", "tawdry".
Jacques Forestier is a young and skinny bisexual who loves to do the opposite of what one expects, but always with a little twist. Those aspects of himself he finds unattractive, he emphasizes. Despising the kind of superiority which always pretends the negation of whatever the received opinion is, he adopts the received opinion, but modifies it so that those who share the received opinion don't recognize it. Jacques has an animal elegance, an artificial naturalness, is an aristocratic man of the people who despises the aristocrats and the people. Politically, he wants to be at the point where the extreme right touches the extreme left... So, you see, Cocteau is having some fun with Jacques. Jacques arranges to be wherever everybody else is not and, from that vantage point, observes all. This is all quickly forgotten.
Poor little Jacques is lonely and in heat, so he must go to where other people are, at least physically. As in Le livre blanc
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
the search for love doesn't go very well for him, but for different reasons. The same is true for the little band of colorful, somewhat unlikely young characters thrown together by chance, straight, bi, gay. But this book has a great deal more charm and spirit than Le livre blanc . It is full of the witty little formules I enjoy reading:
Elle ressemblait à Germaine comme au marbre son moulage en plâtre. C'est dire qu'elles étaient pareilles, sauf tout.
(She resembled Germaine like the plaster cast does the original marble. That's to say they were alike, except in every way.) There's no way to reproduce this little bijou in English, sorry.
The core of the book is the relationship between Jacques and Germaine, which has the same structure as one of the relationships of the protagonist in Le livre blanc - she is an "actress" being kept by an older, rich man and Jacques catches her in bed with her girl friend. Unlike Le livre blanc, the story in this book is told with some sympathy and warmth; the initial irony of the opening is dropped while Cocteau revisits his own memories. In fact, the young Cocteau had such a relationship, and it apparently made quite an impression on him since he revisited it multiple times in his work.
Though this is a rather unusual love story, the emotions, the blindness, the obsession felt during the first love of a young man are the same here as in "normal" stories. The total paralysis when he realizes that it is over and all of his senses stop functioning, then the flood of incredible pain, denial, pain. And the distance between such emotions and those of a much more experienced person - in this case Germaine - is real and well evoked. This is the grand écart of the title. Behind it all, Cocteau demonstrates that while all relationships are accidental, their outcomes are inevitable.
There is yet more to this richly endowed little book. You really should consider reading it.
November 20, 2020
In both literature and cinema, there is an evident influence of the surrealist work on Cocteau. That was the era of Man Ray and Andre Breton, and the Surrealist Manifesto emerged. It was my second experience with this French author after I read The Holy Terrors.
November 29, 2019
Cocteau's little nothing from the early 1920s is not enough for me. In his growing up fable, the genius "playboy" who inspired jealousy displays his rippling wit. No wonder Gide was jealous. Who can resist the line, "Moral laws are the rules of a game at which everybody cheats." This sort of outspoken truth made Gide groan.
Cocteau reveals Life: "At the circus, a careless mother allows her child to take part in the experiment of a Chinese magician. He is put into a box. The box is opened -- empty. It is closed again. Opened once more, the child appears and goes back to his seat. It is no longer the same child. But no one suspects that."
This is what happens when we grow up, if we do grow up, but, like Cocteau, you need a tough fiber to survive.
Cocteau reveals Life: "At the circus, a careless mother allows her child to take part in the experiment of a Chinese magician. He is put into a box. The box is opened -- empty. It is closed again. Opened once more, the child appears and goes back to his seat. It is no longer the same child. But no one suspects that."
This is what happens when we grow up, if we do grow up, but, like Cocteau, you need a tough fiber to survive.
May 3, 2021
A coming of age story set in Paris in the 1920s. Jacque from the provinces comes to Paris to study but falls in with a bohemian crowd. He falls in love with Germaine who is a kept woman for a wealthy banker called Nestor. Jacque for Germaine is an amusing distraction who she drops for Stopwell an English lodger at the house he lives.
The author captures Jacque’s depression of losing Germaine wonderfully. Jacque spirals downward and after a failed suicide attempt sees the world more clearly. Overall a thought provoking novella around the theme of jealousy.
The author captures Jacque’s depression of losing Germaine wonderfully. Jacque spirals downward and after a failed suicide attempt sees the world more clearly. Overall a thought provoking novella around the theme of jealousy.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
May 5, 2018
4.5 stars
An excellent read.
Very strong at the beginning, I considered that the story weakened with the relationship of Germaine and Jacques which left me unfazed. I found the characters at his précepteur's place much more interesting than the rather flat love story.
The style is a delight - though I found hard on some occasions to understand some bits. I think that is to be blamed on the fact that J.Cocteau's writing here is very situé: that is he uses metaphors and alludes to things that a modern ready might not know.
I particularly enjoyed how Cocteau writes homosexual love/attraction into his story : that is to say, seamlessly. Boys love girls, boys love boys, girls love boys, girls love girls. It's so simple. Unlike many other authors, it is not treated as a huge theme/issue. It exists, it is there and that's it. Simple. If only the world was like that.
This story broaches a lot of interesting themes amongst which beauty, the influence of beauty on us.
All in all a refreshing read!
An excellent read.
Very strong at the beginning, I considered that the story weakened with the relationship of Germaine and Jacques which left me unfazed. I found the characters at his précepteur's place much more interesting than the rather flat love story.
The style is a delight - though I found hard on some occasions to understand some bits. I think that is to be blamed on the fact that J.Cocteau's writing here is very situé: that is he uses metaphors and alludes to things that a modern ready might not know.
I particularly enjoyed how Cocteau writes homosexual love/attraction into his story : that is to say, seamlessly. Boys love girls, boys love boys, girls love boys, girls love girls. It's so simple. Unlike many other authors, it is not treated as a huge theme/issue. It exists, it is there and that's it. Simple. If only the world was like that.
This story broaches a lot of interesting themes amongst which beauty, the influence of beauty on us.
All in all a refreshing read!
October 18, 2007
I read this because I saw the last two paragraphs quoted in a Belle and Sebastian video. (Is that lame?) If you've seen Cocteau's films, you might be expecting something a little more like a fairy-tale. This book is pretty solidly in the arena of coming-of-age novels, although because of the time and place it chronicles (France in the early 20th century), it has a little exoticism than, say, The Perks Of Being A Wallflower. Cocteau mocks the ideal of the tortured teenage poet while providing plenty of flowery slogans for those who aspire to such goals.
January 10, 2023
"Vuelve a ser el que era antes de su historia de amor".
En una primera novela se pueden perdonar las imperfecciones, de hecho a veces hasta forman parte de su encanto y frescura. Lo que ya no me gusta tanto es cuando se nota que el autor apenas ha vivido y eso repercute en unos personajes poco creíbles, en una trama que avanza a trompicones y en unas reflexiones grandilocuentes pero vacías. Parece escrito por un adolescente, pero se supone que Cocteau tenía 34 años cuando la publicó. Cuesta creerlo.
En una primera novela se pueden perdonar las imperfecciones, de hecho a veces hasta forman parte de su encanto y frescura. Lo que ya no me gusta tanto es cuando se nota que el autor apenas ha vivido y eso repercute en unos personajes poco creíbles, en una trama que avanza a trompicones y en unas reflexiones grandilocuentes pero vacías. Parece escrito por un adolescente, pero se supone que Cocteau tenía 34 años cuando la publicó. Cuesta creerlo.
December 14, 2008
Elizabeth Bowen described this book as “butterfly-like,” and there is an ephemeral quality to both the story and its style. I found some scattered sentences to be very evocative. For example, “Memories of human beauty stayed with him like wounds.” and “In reality, he was leaving a dry skin floating on the Grand Canal, like a snake’s slough hanging on a wild rose bush, as light as foam, slit at the eyes and mouth.”
August 6, 2019
Free download available at Project Gutenberg
I made the proofing of this book for Free Literature and it will be published by Project Gutenberg.
I made the proofing of this book for Free Literature and it will be published by Project Gutenberg.
June 29, 2023
Reminded me of Dead Poets society but without the poetry, and perhaps a more cynical air. I guess they both share a deep link to romanticism - but in this books case it describes the 'de-romanticisation' of a young man, as he discovers that wearing his heart on his sleeve in the modern day is woefully out of fashion.
August 23, 2024
El vago deseo de la belleza nos mata. […] Jacques deseaba el vacío hasta la extenuación. Pues ¿acaso el vacío no es esos cuerpos y esos rostros que nuestra mirada recorre localmente sin llegar a conmoverles?
August 8, 2017
The Miscreant, Cocteau's first novel, while flawed, consistently manages to entertain.
Written in the 1920s, it could work as a companion piece to Fitzgerald's This Side of Paradise or Callaghan's that Summer in Paris. Content wise, it is arguably influenced by Goethe's The Sorrows of Young Werther and surely influenced Perks of being a Wallflower.
Cocteau's prose captures young, passionate love. Like many "good" love stories, it is primarily the account of Germaine, Jacques and Osiris. One has looks, one has passion and the other money. The novel unfolds as a very soft Bildungsroman.
The paragraphs are a little haphazard, and unlike Bowen's quote on the cover, I'd describe the prose as a hummingbird-like rather than butterfly-like.
The story unfolds at a quick pace and there's plenty of quotable lines and passages.
That being said, many of the characters remain mere images. Two-dimensional representations of stock characters used at the author's whim to induce conflict.
This is a good, but not great book. Some of its wonder may have been lost in translation. I regret not reading it in french, but could only find an english copy.
Cocteau renders mood and dialogue in a convincing way, only it lacks of the magic from his films and some of the wonder found in his later novels.
Some memorable lines:
"She had her own room. They went to bed there and adored each other for the last time. Did Jacques foresee it? Not in the slightest. Neither did -. They were right, as they were often to make love afterwards"
"A road can sometimes look so different on the way out and on the way back that traveller, coming home thinks he is lost."
"When everything is moving at once, nothing appears to be moving"
"She was afraid of the caretaker...not in the case the caretaker would think "another one", but in the case she would be shocked to see that she no longer went in alone".
"The heart lives in confinement. Hence its outbursts of melancholy, its fits of deep despair. Ever ready to pour out riches, it is at the mercy of its membrane. What does it know the poor blind thing? It watches anxiously for the slightest sign that would relieve the tedium. Thousands of nerves bring the news. Is the object for which its help is sought a worthy one? It does not matter. It pours itself out trustingly, it drains itself dry and if it is ordered to stop it writhes and gasps its last. Jacques heart has just been told to start. It did so with a beginner's clumsiness and enthusiasm"
Written in the 1920s, it could work as a companion piece to Fitzgerald's This Side of Paradise or Callaghan's that Summer in Paris. Content wise, it is arguably influenced by Goethe's The Sorrows of Young Werther and surely influenced Perks of being a Wallflower.
Cocteau's prose captures young, passionate love. Like many "good" love stories, it is primarily the account of Germaine, Jacques and Osiris. One has looks, one has passion and the other money. The novel unfolds as a very soft Bildungsroman.
The paragraphs are a little haphazard, and unlike Bowen's quote on the cover, I'd describe the prose as a hummingbird-like rather than butterfly-like.
The story unfolds at a quick pace and there's plenty of quotable lines and passages.
That being said, many of the characters remain mere images. Two-dimensional representations of stock characters used at the author's whim to induce conflict.
This is a good, but not great book. Some of its wonder may have been lost in translation. I regret not reading it in french, but could only find an english copy.
Cocteau renders mood and dialogue in a convincing way, only it lacks of the magic from his films and some of the wonder found in his later novels.
Some memorable lines:
"She had her own room. They went to bed there and adored each other for the last time. Did Jacques foresee it? Not in the slightest. Neither did -. They were right, as they were often to make love afterwards"
"A road can sometimes look so different on the way out and on the way back that traveller, coming home thinks he is lost."
"When everything is moving at once, nothing appears to be moving"
"She was afraid of the caretaker...not in the case the caretaker would think "another one", but in the case she would be shocked to see that she no longer went in alone".
"The heart lives in confinement. Hence its outbursts of melancholy, its fits of deep despair. Ever ready to pour out riches, it is at the mercy of its membrane. What does it know the poor blind thing? It watches anxiously for the slightest sign that would relieve the tedium. Thousands of nerves bring the news. Is the object for which its help is sought a worthy one? It does not matter. It pours itself out trustingly, it drains itself dry and if it is ordered to stop it writhes and gasps its last. Jacques heart has just been told to start. It did so with a beginner's clumsiness and enthusiasm"
August 10, 2020
"La creencia vaga forma almas diletantes".
"Estamos llenos de deseos que nos enajenan".
"Por desgracia, el tipo de libertad de que disponemos nos deja cometer errores que un vegetal, un animal evitan".
"El corazón vive aprisionado. De ahí proceden sus sombríos arrebatos y sus tremendos desalientos. Siempre dispuesto a brindar sus riquezas, se encuentra a merced de la membrana que lo apresa. ¿Qué sabe, el pobre ciego? Acecha la más mínima señal que le libere de su tormento. Miles de fibras le avisan. ¿El objeto por el cual se requiere su ayuda es merecedor de ella? Poco importa. Se extenúa confiadamente y si recibe la orden de parar, se crispa en un agotamiento mortal".
"El vago deseo de la belleza nos mata".
"Nada más despertar, es el animal, la planta, quien piensa en nosotros. Pensamiento primitivo sin el menor disfraz. Vemos un universo terrible, porque vemos la realidad. Poco después la inteligencia nos aporta la carga de sus artificios. Nos surte de las pequeñas distracciones que el hombre inventa para encubrir el vacío. Es entonces cuando creemos ver la realidad. Culpamos de nuestro malestar a los miasmas del cerebro que transita del sueño a la vigilia".
"Esperar es la ocupación más meticulosa".
"–¿Bajo qué uniforme ocultaré un corazón tan grande como el mío? Siempre se notará.
Jacques sentía que volví a ser sombra. Sabía que para vivir en la Tierra es preciso seguir las modas y el corazón ya no se estila".
"Estamos llenos de deseos que nos enajenan".
"Por desgracia, el tipo de libertad de que disponemos nos deja cometer errores que un vegetal, un animal evitan".
"El corazón vive aprisionado. De ahí proceden sus sombríos arrebatos y sus tremendos desalientos. Siempre dispuesto a brindar sus riquezas, se encuentra a merced de la membrana que lo apresa. ¿Qué sabe, el pobre ciego? Acecha la más mínima señal que le libere de su tormento. Miles de fibras le avisan. ¿El objeto por el cual se requiere su ayuda es merecedor de ella? Poco importa. Se extenúa confiadamente y si recibe la orden de parar, se crispa en un agotamiento mortal".
"El vago deseo de la belleza nos mata".
"Nada más despertar, es el animal, la planta, quien piensa en nosotros. Pensamiento primitivo sin el menor disfraz. Vemos un universo terrible, porque vemos la realidad. Poco después la inteligencia nos aporta la carga de sus artificios. Nos surte de las pequeñas distracciones que el hombre inventa para encubrir el vacío. Es entonces cuando creemos ver la realidad. Culpamos de nuestro malestar a los miasmas del cerebro que transita del sueño a la vigilia".
"Esperar es la ocupación más meticulosa".
"–¿Bajo qué uniforme ocultaré un corazón tan grande como el mío? Siempre se notará.
Jacques sentía que volví a ser sombra. Sabía que para vivir en la Tierra es preciso seguir las modas y el corazón ya no se estila".
June 3, 2007
my second read from jean cocteau's oeuvre, i am beginning to develop a love/hate relationship with his writing style, punctuating scenes from the novel with poetic metaphors that lend some truth to his character's sensibilites.
these 'interruptions' only work when when you have experienced or actually have knowledge of what he is referring to in his metaphors. it makes you more in tune with his character's way of thinking. but i find that most of them are lost on me as this book is dated and what worked then to readers of that period probably has no effect now. in addition, these metaphors tend to break the narrative, making it a bit tiresome for me to get back in the right mind frame to continue where we had left off.
all in all, i enjoyed this book of young jacques forestier,who got swept up in a passionate love affair with germaine the chorus girl, that was essentially 'doomed from the start'.
these 'interruptions' only work when when you have experienced or actually have knowledge of what he is referring to in his metaphors. it makes you more in tune with his character's way of thinking. but i find that most of them are lost on me as this book is dated and what worked then to readers of that period probably has no effect now. in addition, these metaphors tend to break the narrative, making it a bit tiresome for me to get back in the right mind frame to continue where we had left off.
all in all, i enjoyed this book of young jacques forestier,who got swept up in a passionate love affair with germaine the chorus girl, that was essentially 'doomed from the start'.
January 11, 2013
I love Cocteau's epigrammatic prose style. It's heady and addictive and enthralling. This novel (his first, dating from 1921) is a masterpiece. The actual story is fairly slight, merely an account of a love affair that goes wrong among a couple of denizens (he more sensitive and less pragmatic than she) of a semi-Bohemian corner of Paris in the early years of the 20th Century; but the way the tale is told is truly exquisite. This fine edition includes many of Cocteau's unique drawings. A wonderful novel, tragic but luminous.
September 3, 2013
Exquisitely French, Cocteau's one liners, insights, and descriptions are beautiful.
September 26, 2023
Tante intuizioni geniali, si vede la penna dei Ragazzi Terribili, ma qui di romanzo c'è molto poco.
April 24, 2024
This book was super hyped up for me because of my French phase but ended up being kind of shallow and mid. It was prettily written I guess but never got deep and the conflict was pretty surface level. I couldn’t empathize with any character in the novel which is pretty shit. I can see how when it was written it would strike people as shocking or representative of an idealistic, bohemian type of life, but it didn’t really do it for me. Other books that try to personify this era bohemian life do a better job and have made more of an impact on me. Not worth a read tbh
September 7, 2021
Quando li em Português/PT eu tinha quase a mesma idade do personagem central. Hoje, com 60, reli no original e encontrei diversas semelhanças de estilo, que deixam claro as minhas influências literárias no romance francês.
Livro excelente, especialmente pela sutileza aforismática usada por Cocteau.
Livro excelente, especialmente pela sutileza aforismática usada por Cocteau.
October 22, 2023
Realmente lo que más merece la lectura es el epílogo. O el capítulo del intento que sui-
Una cosa que no soporto son los símiles que utiliza: "Jacques se lanzó al mar como el bañista que ha perdido su bañador y se afana en encontrarlo"
Una cosa que no soporto son los símiles que utiliza: "Jacques se lanzó al mar como el bañista que ha perdido su bañador y se afana en encontrarlo"
April 17, 2021
3,5/5 🌟
April 28, 2022
it was giving L’Ecume des jours
August 20, 2022
Lu en deux fois à peine, je sais que je le relirais encore et encore dans les années à venir.
April 9, 2025
réel 💔
May 3, 2023
I loved the writing! Like the original title suggests, Cocteau does a lot of acrobatics with the language. Unexpected metaphors, imaginative descriptions. There is almost a rhythm or melody to the paragraphs at times. I found the description of the main character at the beginning interesting right off the bat. Unfortunately I feel like his character dwindled in presence later on in comparison.
I didn't care for the plot itself but it was a really interesting read from an artistic point of view.
(Read in Hungarian)
I didn't care for the plot itself but it was a really interesting read from an artistic point of view.
(Read in Hungarian)
January 29, 2014
Le style de Cocteau est unique et splendide. Une narration singulière pleine d'images audacieuses mais qui semblent tellement évidentes : "la mer trop courte et qui ôte toujours à une plage ce qu'elle donne à l'autre", "pour vivre sur terre il faut en suivre les modes et le coeur ne s'y porte plus",...
Le récit est celui d'une entrée dans l'âge adulte et d'un coeur brisé pour la première fois par l'amour pour une femme volage et inconstante. La teneur est éculée mais la manière rachète tout.
Le récit est celui d'une entrée dans l'âge adulte et d'un coeur brisé pour la première fois par l'amour pour une femme volage et inconstante. La teneur est éculée mais la manière rachète tout.
July 10, 2015
This book and its analysis of the human condition is both harsh to the point of being scientific and utterly poetic. Jacques seems to get no sympathy from anyone, not the mysterious narrator or Germaine, even his own mother is partially ignorant of his suffering. A true representation of the loneliness of adolescence.
Also, one of the few novels with pictures that you can read and still feel intellectual.
Also, one of the few novels with pictures that you can read and still feel intellectual.
January 17, 2015
Un grande autore Bench� si tratti del suo primo libro, si ritrova in questo testo tutta la graffiante vitalit� di Jean Cocteau e della sua arte. E' un testo piacevole ma ispirato, pieno di sottili aforisimi e che avvolge il lettore fino alla fine in un sottofondo di cinica critica alle virt� borghesi. Da legegre fino in fondo.
July 2, 2011
Meet Cocteau where he is, don't expect him to be like anyone else. His sentences are filled with insight. Read his prose, watch his films and look at his art to capture the full effect.
June 15, 2015
Adolescent nonsense saved by decent prose.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 30 reviews