Are houses as set pieces or centerpieces the trend in literature recently? Or perhaps they just keep crossing my reading path, so I am inclined to compare them in some way (and they mostly seem to be British!). One similarity between Hadley and, say, Sarah Waters, THE PAYING GUESTS, or Rebecca Makkai’s THE HUNDRED YEAR HOUSE, is that all three novels are divided into three parts. I even titled my review of Makkai’s book “A generational triptych.” Hadley’s story is also a triptych, divided by “The Present,” “The Past,” and back to “The Present.” The three sections of Hadley’s book are bonded through family bonds, family secrets, marriage, and, of course, the house. The above titles are all very different books, but are all vested in family. And, Hadley, in THE PAST, demonstrates her chops in mastering the family drama and a flair for making her set piece come alive:
“…the under-earth smell of imprisoned air, something plaintive in the thin light of the hall with its grey and white tiled floor…There was always a moment of adjustment as the shabby, needy actuality of the place settled over their too-hopeful idea of it.”
At issue here is the house in the English countryside that may need to be sold, one that is rarely used. It has been in the Crane family for a while, but costs a small fortune to upkeep. Gathering there for three weeks together to discuss this uncomfortable and tension-mounting topic are the three middle-age sisters, Harriet, Alice, and Fran (only Fran is married, but her husband is not here with her children, and one wonders if there is some strain there), and the brother, Roland, with his third wife, a stunning, young, and intimidating Argentinian lawyer, Pilar, who makes the women feel quite dowdy in comparison. Alice also brings Kasim, the 20-year-old son of an ex-boyfriend, which is a feisty friction to upset the balance of sibling-ness, and to create frisson between Kasim and Roland’s teenage daughter, Molly. Moreover, the young and beautiful have brought pheromones into the house, which invariably provokes the envy and frustration of the sisters, some more than others. Too, the blossoming of young lust is igniting Harriet’s secrets, which she tries to keep hidden in a diary. She is almost acting like a teenager herself.
The past provides substance and subtext for the present, and, in the second section, the reader is transported into 1968. This is probably my favorite section, and the now dead matriarch—the siblings’ mother, Jill, is the main character. I think that she is the most contoured and organically dimensional character in the novel, and this section’s events never seem forced. Even the children, who are often stylized in novels, have their own distinct and arresting personalities. In the throes of a 60’s revolution in Paris, Jill’s philandering husband has gone to participate and left her with three young children to care for. Although Jill has an Oxford education, her role is defined by unfair male standards. It is never heavy-handed as the imbalance is placed into sharp relief.
“They had set out to have children as lightly as if they were playing house, and now her…domestic life bored him…The imbalance was fated, built into their biology.” “Tom had said once that anyone could do motherhood: in fact, he added, the less complicated you were, the better mother you would make. This was probably true, but not consoling.”
Jill returns to her parent’s house—the house that is the set piece of the story—to initiate independence from her husband. She possesses a combination of pluck, cunning, and vulnerability, as she wrestles with both the youthful age she is soon leaving and the onslaught of middle age. And, in this section, the children demonstrate the seeds of who they will be as adults.
As the novel spans generations, it also intertwines concepts of heredity. Although a subplot--of Pilar’s possible origins related to the Argentine “Dirty War,” is partly peripheral, and only briefly explored, it also serves as a metaphor for the meaning of family, bloodlines, and the curse of the outlier, or to have competing loyalties. Also, it resonates with the pain of shameful secrets.
My complaints are few. Hadley, who satisfied me with quiet, nuanced strokes—I didn’t need a dramatic plotline—tried to add drama with a few of the climactic events that were just a bit contrived to me. Hadley also occasionally forced lift-off where none felt organically present. And, the sudden presence of a late-coming chracter seemed a bit too symbolically “meaningful.”
Hadley’s confident prose is an instrument of quiet ferocity. She commands the page in almost every sentence, which made reading a pleasure. The more elegant her prose, the more interior the reader goes into the human condition.
Thinks Alice at age 46, about never having children: “All those little eggs which were inside her when she was born: Alice imagined them like clusters of tiny pearly teeth, and the idea of them washing away one by one was a relief as well as a regret.” Eloquent and memorable.