What do you think?
Rate this book


167 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2004
With his breadth of economic and cultural analysis, Ambedkar should have stood in the forefront of the men whose ideas shaped India. Yet he is barely admitted into their ranks. With the failure of a broad political alliance, in spite of his many writings and policies on the crucial issues of the time, from the question of Pakistan to that of the economic structuring of independent India, Ambedkar has retained a place in the collective memory of India primarily as the leader of India’s untouchables. With his movement no longer a political threat to Congress dominance, his leadership qualities could be recognized and used when he was made chair of the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution, and then law minister in the first cabinet of independent India. But this was a failure of the broader transformative project that Dalits and non-Brahmans had sought to project for the new nation, a failure which in the end laid the way open for a renewed and often ugly and brutal growth of militant Hindutva forces in independent India.
The Hindu code was the greatest social reform measure ever undertaken by the Legislature in this country. No law… in the past or… the future can be compared to it in its significance. To leave inequality between class and class, between sex and sex which is the soul of Hindu society untouched and to go on passing legislation relating to economic problems is to make a farce of our Constitution and to build a palace on a dung heap (Ambedkar 1995, 14, bk 1:1325)
At a personal level also, the fast represented a failure of non-violence. In fact Ambedkar posed a unique problem to Gandhi’s whole non-violent methodology. Ambedkar was not a colonial ruler whose inner guilt or suppressed psychological tendencies made him vulnerable to universalistic and moral appeals; he was a leader of the most oppressed group within Indian society, and one who was perhaps uniquely free from the sense of shame injected into most untouchables by orthodox Hinduism. Gandhi could also not appeal to a genuine latent identity with Hinduism. What was left was only external pressure: though directed against Ambedkar, the pressure that came through the fast-to-death was one brought by Gandhi’s caste Hindu followers—the fear of a wide village backlash against Dalits.


