Not as compelling as I had anticipated; in fact by the end of the book I was downright frustrated.
First, the title is deceptive. The author was never "on the run" from ISIS with persecuted Christians. She was traveling among Christians in the Middle East, many after they had been displaced from their homes, and recounting the stories of their experiences and those of friends/relatives/associates/church leaders that they knew. Yes, the region was tense, there was danger, and I've no doubt the author experienced many adrenaline rushes akin to running for one's life, but ISIS was not actively pursuing/hounding her or those immediately around her.
Yes, the Christian heritage in the region goes back two thousand years to the time of Christ. Yes, the Biblical significance of the region is profound. The destruction of artifacts, historic landmarks, and family homes by ISIS is horrible, but historically precedented (i.e., they're not the first; they won't be the last).
My frustration stemmed from the idea that somehow, these people who have lived thousands of years in hostile regions need the U.S. and other western troops to come in and "save" them. This wasn't really a factual treatise, in my opinion, but a journalist account meant to persuade, move, or anger the readership. It was hard to keep track of what was actually going on when, since there were snapshots of specific points in time when the author was there, interspersed with some historical background about a group, an individual, or a place, and then information being recounted to the author while she was there. It seemed more like a compilation of separate articles than a cohesive account.
Personal bias warning here, since I personally know people who have served in Iraq (military and nonmilitary), the author's impression of U.S. involvement, what it has been and what it needs to be, is not the same as mine. Those I know haven't talked about their experiences much (and I haven't asked), but one of the reasons I read this book is to find out more about the backstory when all I usually see are the headlines. My two star review mostly has to do with the fact that I don't really feel much more enlightened now than when I started the book, and I disagree with some of the author's conclusions about certain situations. It was an okay book, but I would not reread it.
Okay, back to content information for those who are considering whether they want to read the book.
I am still trying to figure out why 150,000 people were relocating because of a band of 2,500(?) ISIS soldiers. Much like the poem by Martin Niemoller, my impression from the author is the majority of persecuted people in the region (Coptic Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Turkmen, and others) seem to be content to ignore violence against the other minorities until such time it is practiced against them, and then they submit or flee. The author doesn't appear to have asked them why they did not resist, nor was it self-evident to me from the factual information provided why they would not.
One small group of the displaced actually took up arms to defend their families and prevent ISIS from expanding their reach to another town, (hurrah for them!) but they were worried they would be ostracized because they were meeting violence with violence--and yet (according to the author) those who would ostracize this band of resistance fighters want and expect foreign soldiers and Kurd soldiers to fight and die on their behalf. I find this mindset, especially after all of the recorded genocides of the world, inexplicable and borderline self-harm. I can only hope the author's relatively narrow experience in the region (no aspersion cast, just quantifying the fact she cannot travel freely most places and even if she could is still only one person trying to cover an entire country with a strong language barrier) and personal feelings about the matter (it appears she strongly believes the U.S. should go in and fix things) have conflated my impression that the majority of citizens of Iraq are sheeple willing to follow the lead of and conform to the directives of others at the expense of their own comfort, livelihood, and life and the lives of those they hold most dear.
In sum, what piqued my interest about the book initially faded and I was left with a bad aftertaste. It now makes more sense to me how ISIS (and Al Qaeda for that matter) spread as they do. It seems akin to France surrendering to Germany after 5 weeks of active assault, with pockets of resistance reforming and continuing to fight, while the majority of the country simply tries to move on, live as normal a life as possible or migrate elsewhere, while waiting for other armies to come save them or liberate their country so they can return.
Disclaimer: I received a prepublication digital galley proof of this book from the publisher. Due to its prepublication nature and the fact that my review copy has expired, I regret I am unable to provide specific numbers and quotes from the text to support my (decidedly outside of the normal reviewer) takeaway from this book. Also, to make very clear, I have nothing but sympathy for everyone who has been and continues to be persecuted for their religious, ethnic, or cultural status. Their plight moves me, and I understand fully and applaud those independent soldiers, contractors, and citizens who traveled to Iraq to join the resistance. If I had any knowledge of the region and language and wouldn't just be a burden I would be tempted to join them. Which is part of the reason I find it inexplicable the majority of the persecuted sects in Iraq are not actively organizing some type of resistance.