Q: ‘We’ve done an excellent job with our children, don’t you think?' (c) A number on them, more like it.
Q: Rosa was a toddler when I first made her promise not to kill. (c)
Q: I want to scream at them that I’m their seventeen-year-old son, not Rosa’s co-parent. But I am, even if they’ll never admit it. (c)
Bizarre, underresearched and overrated. Most of characters might want to try to get their heads out of their respective asses. It might miraculously cure them of their numerous conditions and improve their quality of life. Vastly. The enertaining value is there but the lack of proper research is abysmal. I don't know, either the author spoke specifically to moron psychologists or wherever else she got her info on psychopathy, that info was lacking a lot of connections with reality...
It irritated me to no end that with Rosa the author makes even the most innocuous things sound ominous and prophets doom and gloom at each of her steps. Which gets old by Chapter 3. Rosa is a psychopath, no questions. Still, a lot of stuff was displayed and explained in a very perverted way, which makes me question the veracity of the whole picture. It was as if the author was trying too hard to make Rosa as much psychopathic as possible by trying to stuff every internet article on the subject into Rosa's character. It registered and undermined this book severely. Rosa is overdone in her certifiability.
Even the craziest stuff her bro and parents display, we hear no incrimination on it, until the very end. And they do a lot of questionable stuff. The parents, the brother, they all are borderline, as well. And the author keeps silent about it. On and on, right until things go amok.
Either the author does not recognise that she wrote a family of psychos, or she prefers to downplay their quirks to make Rosa all the more prominent 'l'enfant terrible' at their expense. Either way it doesn't work. And basically, you get to read a book on misrepresented stuff. Here goes my chance to spoil a couple of totally expected twists.
Q:
Rosa is pushing all the buttons...
We’ve never been in business class. Rosa has to explore everything and figure out what she’s allowed to do and how to get away with what she isn’t. (c) Yes, kids explore this world. It's not a sign of psychopathy but rather of a curiosity in their developing psyche.
Q:
She can get lost like that, pushing buttons, counting sand, calculating angles, figuring out how things work, how to make them work for her...The flight is long: Rosa will get bored, she’ll look for ways to make trouble...
‘Tutors never believe I’m a genius...I am a prodigy, though...
‘I’m a chess prodigy,’ she says...
‘I wrote about how I learned that I’m not allowed to leave the house without you or them accompanying me. Even though I know how to read a map and not to get in a car with a stranger. I learned to not be rude to the police because they can lock you up or kill you if they want to and they won’t get in trouble. I concluded that our society doesn’t let ten-year-olds be independent and brave and explore even if that’s what parents say they want and that’s why most ten-year-olds act like babies. I wrote that in the Amazon there are three-year-olds who already know how to skin and gut an animal and sharpen their own knives, who don’t act like babies. I concluded that I learned that our society is broken.’ (c)
Savant-ish? OCD? Did they even try to give her the really advanced materials before she got to killing things to study/read/enjoy the world in a scientific way? Really, the child is obviously bored out of her mind and gets up to crazy shit. How about letting her learn to use that mind constructively?
Obviously, she's not challenged enough as it is.
Q:
That’s the game she plays. My job is to stop her...
I used to tell the parentals everything Rosa did. I’ve stopped. They’re convinced her acting out – yes, that’s what they call it – is normal for a kid her age. Besides, they always say, she’s much better than she was...
I don’t think it matters what you call it: psychopathy, sociopathy, antisocial personality disorder, evil, or the devil within. What matters is how to prevent the bomb from exploding...
Rosa is a ticking bomb and she’s my responsibility...
Keep Rosa under control... (c) The bro just might be sort of deluded and a bit of a control freak.
And the bunch of diagnoses, very different ones, is not helping there. It's actually borderline name-calling.
Q:
‘See?’ Rosa says. ‘I do care about other people. I helped her. What’s my reward?’
‘Helping someone else is your reward.’
Rosa rolls her eyes. An expression she saves for me. ‘I think the flight attendant should give me her earrings.’ (c)No boundaries. Not necessarily psychopathy.
Q:
‘Close the window, Rosa.’
She slides a small book out of her backpack, turning it so I can see the front.
An Australian passport. She opens it to the photo page: the horrible drunk from the plane.
I lunge as Rosa pushes it out the window.
‘I win,’ Rosa says. (c)So the sis stole a drunk passenger's passport and dealt her own brand of justice. Uh-huh.
Q:
Rosa mostly keeps her promises by finding loopholes. She’ll be a terrifying lawyer. (c)Well,
this society does need lawyers. And I'm sure this quip is taken from the research saying that lawyers (just like about 10 other occupations) attract a lot pshychopaths into their ranges. See, we take a child and go on to criticise it basing on her possible future profession. Like, uh?
Q:
My sister Rosa was born in our Sydney home when I was seven years old. I watched the whole thing,...
Rosa’s birth didn’t traumatise me.
It was beautiful and kind of boring...
The midwife smiled at me. ‘Do you want to see, Che? She’s crowning.’...
In the mirror I could see something dark and slimy between Sally’s legs. It didn’t look like a baby’s head, it looked like a monster...
Rosa shot out so fast she was a blur. The midwife caught her...
She was so little, so perfect, with the biggest eyes I’d ever seen, looking straight at me. I couldn’t stop staring.
The midwife put Rosa on Sally’s belly and Sally cradled the tiny baby in her hands.... (c) Do I need to list a number of things about THIS scene that do not work?
The unrealistic birth?
Grown men sometimes have issues with this process. A 7-year-old boy witnessing his mother giving birth? Not traumatised, of COURSE not. Which just might be why at 17 he could be obsessing about each of her steps.
Meet the dysfunctional family dynamics:
(c) I used every argument to persuade them. That everything since I was twelve has been chaos. Different homes, different cities, different countries. New Zealand, Indonesia, Thailand and now the USA. Which has meant different schools and sometimes haphazard homeschooling.
How am I going to get into medical school without stability? I didn’t bother to mention how hard it is to not work with my Sydney boxing trainer, Natalie. My parents aren’t thrilled by my boxing.
What about Rosa? I asked. She only had five years in the one home. You’re keeping her away from our extended family, from our aunts and uncles and cousins, grandparents. She needs to be looked after by family, not strangers. How can she make friends when we move so often?
She’s dangerous, I didn’t say.
I talked about how much I missed my friends. How much I missed being surrounded by people who sound like me. How sick I was of being a foreigner.
Friends and family make us who we are, I argued. Everyone needs a community. Rosa especially, I didn’t say.
You can make more friends, they argued. We’re moving to New York to make the world a better place. Sometimes you have to put the greater good first.
You care more about the world than me and Rosa, I yelled.
Which was when I lost. Sally and David have no respect for anyone who resorts to emotion. You have to be calm and rational to win an argument. You have to be an adult even if you aren’t one.I hate you, I didn’t say. (c) Nice family, huh? Actially, healthy people do resort to emotions, at least occasionally, at least with family. And if kids are discouraged from early ages from that, we get a bunch of kids who have issues with emotions. Not necessarily psychopathy. There are lots of things that could go wrong at this juncture. Another thing that drew my attention here is how the boyo carefully edits things he says. That's not too different from his supposedly awful sis.
Q:
Rosa ticks off everything on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist except for promiscuity, driving too fast and other adult sins. Give her time.
The checklists – there are different versions – each have dozens of questions designed to fit into different factors. The four that make sense to me are:
Callousness: Rosa doesn’t care about anyone but herself.
Disinhibition: Rosa is an impulsive thrillseeker. Her risk assessment is terrible because she doesn’t believe anything can happen to her. If she wants something she takes it.
Fearlessness: Nothing scares her. She’s never worried.
Charisma: She has way too much. She can charm most people and get them to do what she wants. (c) Well, this in itself is a very callous evaluation.
Callousness? Young kids can be like that. One has to teach them how to care about people. Preferably by example, not by plotting agaist her (bro) and forbidding emotions (parents).
Thrillseeker? Her risk assessment is terrible? She is not scared of stuff? No shit. She's a young kid.
None of these can vouch a person is psychopath.
Charming? Kids are evolutionally made to be liked.
Any of these could be applicable to any number of people or kids, none of which could be psychopaths. These are not primary or definitive identificators. There aren't even identificators. You can be bad at risk assessment, seeking thrills and charming/rude as hell and have no disorders.
Q:
Rosa learned everything slower than her cousins. Everything that isn’t hardwired...
It was smiling and laughing and hugging and kissing and crying and pointing that came slowly. All the things humans do with each other, and in response to one another, Rosa was slow to acquire. She put her arms up for us to carry her months after her cousins did the same thing. Though once she realised she could use us as taxis she was into it. (c) Actually, many kids are just less socially attuned than others. So, a child might be not into 'putting up her arms', just like that. And conspiring in a crib to use people as taxis?? Spare me.
Q:
For her first two years she barely cried. She was more intrigued than dismayed by cuts or bruises or illnesses. Most babies cry when someone else is crying, especially another baby. Not Rosa.
(c) Some perfectly normal and healthy kids don't scream or otherwise imitate surroundings. Usually, the intellectually advanced ones.
Q:
The not-crying worried the parentals more than anything else. So Rosa started crying. She watched how the cousins did it and copied. Not convincingly at first. She’d make strangled sounds and blink her eyes rapidly to get tears to roll. But Sally and David bought it and after a while she was producing real tears.
She lied with those tears as surely as she did with her words. (c) Once again, the crib consiracy theory is crazy. You have a child. This child is not attuned with repeating stuff, initially. After, I don't know, 6 months out of womb, this child learns how to repeat actions/cry/etc? And? It's not indicative of sociopathy. It's individuality. Yes, people are different. so are kids.
Q:
She wasn’t smiling when we smiled at her. She wasn’t responding to her name. She was almost two and was yet to say a single word. ...
They took her to a doctor.
Lo and behold, Rosa started smiling. She started talking...
She understood what they were saying about her not smiling. She looked up from the toys she was playing with and stretched her mouth wide, showing her teeth. It didn’t look like a real smile... (c) Some children actually start talking only in full phrases and only after they feel ready and are sure that they pronounce stuff correctly. Future perfectionists? Shy kids? It's a kid who learns about the world in a bit different an order than some peers. No big deal.
Q:
Having Rosa for a sister makes me view people differently. I don’t trust charm – not that Leilani is exhibiting any, but I can tell she can when she wants. The only people I instantly trust are the ones who are uneasy around Rosa. (c) Poor guy - so scared of his little sis
Q:
I saw Rosa pinch her own forearm hard and reached across to stop her. She screamed and cried. ‘Che hurt Rosa,’ she blurted.
My hand was on her arm, next to the large red mark...
‘Why did you pinch your baby sister?’
‘I didn’t.’
They didn’t believe me. But the parentals changed their minds a week later when Rosa told a woman on the street that she didn’t want to sleep in the kennel anymore. We didn’t even own a dog.
She only did it when we were out in public. When there were witnesses who wouldn’t believe that the little blonde curly-haired angel could be lying. She did it to embarrass us. She did it because it made her laugh...
She lied to everyone, hid who she was from everyone.
Everyone but me.
Me, she used for triangulation. Me, she watched to see if I frowned at her laughter or joined in. Me, she confided in. (c)
Q:
We find the parentals arguing politics with an old white man handing out anarchist pamphlets on the other side of the park. They haven’t even noticed they lost Rosa. (c)
Q:
Switching my phone to record, I open the door...
‘What did you learn about behaving like a normal person?’
‘I need to lie better. I should have pretended to be sorry straight away. Next time I’ll burst into tears as soon as I see the police.’...
‘Everyone lies,’ Rosa says. ‘Everyone pretends that lying is bad but everyone does it. Telling the truth is ruder than lying. If I told people what I thought, I’d be in trouble all the time. My mistake last night was telling the truth: that I was proud to beat old men at chess. I should have lied.’
(c)Actually, the bro is illicitly gathering proof on his sis behaving in a weird way... How's that matching his ethics?
For one, I strongly dislike pseudo-sience. I also am worried that the author actially got her info from somewhere. And if the official science is actually THAT abysmal on diagnosing the psychopathy problem, then this society is in for a world of pain. I feel that introducing wrong ideas may bring forth the following negative tendencies:
1. If people start diagnosing psychopathy basing on a child starting to talk later or any other likeminded stuff, a lot of kids could get labelled wrongly. A lot of misdiagnostics could ensue.
2. If we begin to consider psychopathy with kids who are introverted enough to not hold hands right away or smile back or whatever, this may blur a lot of the diagnostical edges. Basically, we would start seeing real psychopathy as something of a pretty much harmless quirk. Which it might turn out to be or not, depending on a lot of factors.
Q:
Acting is for those who want to be exploited by misogynist assholes. (c) Sucky-suck.
Q:
‘I’m Dido,’ she says. ‘For those of you who don’t know me, I’m tough, but fair.’
I deduct points because every trainer says some variation of that. I’m waiting for the first one to say, I’m pissweak and totally unfair. (c)
Best parents ever:
Q:
‘You call them by their first names.’...
‘Yes. We always have because, and I’m quoting them again, we are not gendered roles, we are not a mum and a dad, we are people. They also believe that children are people and should be allowed to develop at their own pace and not forced to enact the role of child.’
‘So you get to do whatever you want? Give me some of that!’...
‘I wish. Instead of saying because we told you so they say because we are legally bound to look after you and teach you and should you do this thing we do not wish you to do there could be legally sanctioned repercussions. Even if there aren’t until you are eighteen you have no legal standing to disobey us.’
‘Wow.’
‘Yeah. Arguing with them is like arguing with the wind. A caring, loving wind that wishes it could help you out. But wind. All wind.’
‘Do you ever want to punch them?’ (c)
Q:
They look like tiny members of a psychopathic cheerleading cult. (c)