The young Tsar had just ascended the throne. For five weeks he had worked without ceasing, in the way that Tsars are accustomed to work. He had been attending to reports, signing papers, receiving ambassadors and high officials who came to be presented to him, and reviewing troops. He was tired, and as a traveller exhausted by heat and thirst longs for a draught of water and for rest, so he longed for a respite of just one day at least from receptions, from speeches, from parades — a few free hours to spend like an ordinary human being with his young, clever, and beautiful wife, to whom he had been married only a month before.
Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (Russian: Лев Николаевич Толстой; most appropriately used Liev Tolstoy; commonly Leo Tolstoy in Anglophone countries) was a Russian writer who primarily wrote novels and short stories. Later in life, he also wrote plays and essays. His two most famous works, the novels War and Peace and Anna Karenina, are acknowledged as two of the greatest novels of all time and a pinnacle of realist fiction. Many consider Tolstoy to have been one of the world's greatest novelists. Tolstoy is equally known for his complicated and paradoxical persona and for his extreme moralistic and ascetic views, which he adopted after a moral crisis and spiritual awakening in the 1870s, after which he also became noted as a moral thinker and social reformer.
His literal interpretation of the ethical teachings of Jesus, centering on the Sermon on the Mount, caused him in later life to become a fervent Christian anarchist and anarcho-pacifist. His ideas on nonviolent resistance, expressed in such works as The Kingdom of God Is Within You, were to have a profound impact on such pivotal twentieth-century figures as Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr.
This short story about a young tsar taken on a dream journey to see all the evil of his empire reads like Dickens' A Christmas Carol. It's quite short and not nearly a satisfying as Dickens' take on the subject, but decently executed nonetheless.
القصير الشاب قصة قصيرة اخرى من روائع تولستوى و اجمل ما فيها انها تناقش امر طالما كان فى اذهاننا نحن ابناء الشعب و هل الحاكم يرى ما نراه ، يشعر بما نشعر به !! اما الفساد فهل هو على علم به , الظلم هل يوافق عليه ، اسئلة لا حصر لها .
هنا ياخذنا تولستوى فى حكاية القصير الشاب الذى بعد انتهاء يومه اخيرا يلجا للراحة فيغفو قليلا و يحلم حلم اقرب الى الواقع , ياخذه شخص الى الازقة و الفقراء , الى المصالح الحكومية , الى الحدود و العساكر ليرى الظلم و الفساد المنتشر بين المسئولين و الفقراء المطحونين بين هولاء .
لنرى عندما يصحو اخيرا هل سوف يصلح الاخطاء ام يصدق المحيطين به ؟ سوف نرى بعد 50 عام كما قال تولستوى ما سيقوله التاريخ
Tbh, I started this one on a whim from a short story collection I have of Tolstoy and it was actually not bad. Nothing exceptional but still a quick and good read.
On reconnaît Tolstoï dans le personnage de "mémoire d'un fou" le jeune homme en guerre avec ses crises d'angoisse (des fois exagérés), torturé par l'absurdité de son existence.
"Ainsi meurt l'amour" était le meilleur récit, là où Tolstoï analyse l'impact de la conscience sociale, et comment l'homme finit par être absorbé par les convictions du milieu où il vit (donnant l'exemple d'Ivan qui a renoncé à l'amour de sa vie "Evanka" parce que son père a fait preuve de bassesse envers un prisonnier).
Extrait de la fin (calme mais bouleversante): "Je ne sais comment j'arrivai jusqu'à mon domicile et comment je me couchai. Mais je ne pus m'endormir, je sursautais à chaque instant. - Il doit connaître quelque chose que j'ignore, pensais-je en songeant au colonel. Si je le savais, je comprendrais peut-être ce que j'ai vu et cela ne me torturerait plus. Mais j'eus beau réfléchir, je ne pus trouver. Et je m'endormis seulement vers le soir ; et encore après m'être préalablement enivrer avec un camarade. En avais-je conclu que le supplice était inique ? Pas le moins du monde : si cela se faisait avec une telle assurance et était considéré comme nécessaire, c'est qu'une raison qui m'était inconnue justifiait l'acte. Et je cherchais à percer le mystère, mais en vain. Aussi, dans cet état de doute, je renonçai à entrer dans l'armée comme je l'avais longtemps désiré. Je ne servis donc nulle part et, comme vous le voyez, je n'ai pas été bon à grand'chose. - Nous dirons, au contraire, qu'il y a bien des gens qui ne vous valent pas. - Ça, ce n'est qu'un sottise certaine,s'écria Ivan Vassilievitch avec une colère très sincère. - Et l'amour ? dit l'un de nous. - L'amour ?... Depuis ce jour-là, il partit à la dérive... Quand, suivant son habitude, souriante et rêveuse, elle me regardait, je voyais aussitôt le colonel sur le champ de torture et je ressentais une gêne extrême. Nos entrevues devinrent de plus en plus rares et l'amour descendit à zéro... Et voilà comment vont les choses, voilà comment se détermine une vie... Et vous dites?... termina-t-il".
Nothing I love more than a depiction of war as a moving entity of the sanctified rage and helplessness of the society it will engulf and how it shaped Russian culture
J'ai apprécié cette lecture et j'en suis même sorti avec de petites "citations" qui m'ont plu !
Les mémoires d'un fou : "Il me semblait que j'avais peur de la mort, mais, devant la vie, je tremblais encore plus. Imperceptiblement, la vie et la mort s'amalgamaient, s'unissaient."
Le réveillon du jeune tsar (Mon conte préféré dans ce recueil, et qui me semble-t-il va me pousser à faire une connaissance plus profonde de la culture ainsi que la littérature Russe) :
"Ils sont ainsi des centaines de mille, et des meilleurs. Les uns, perdus par une fausse éducation, les autres, que l'on a volontairement pervertis, car l'Etat a besoin de pervers. Et c'est ainsi que se perd tout ce qui est jeune, l'espoir du monde. Mais malheur à celui qui sacrifie toute cette claire jeunesse!"
"Il faudrait remettre une partie de ton pouvoir au peuple [..] tout en gardant cette parcelle de pouvoir qu'exige la direction générale des affaires."
j’ai une théorie sur le fait que Tolstoï est un génie quand il s’agit d’écrire des romans de 1000 pages mais qu’il est quand même bien moins bon pour les contes / nouvelles (à vérifier) + ça manque de folie
Conclusion: You're not just a tsar, or a king, or a pilot or an enginner. You're a human being. Take responsibility for what you can control and happens around you.
Tolstoï, de façon erronée, semble attribuer à la foi ce qui est du domaine de la conscience humaine. Une lecture néanmoins très agréable ; des portraits intéressants d’un monde voué à disparaître.
From the collection, "A Very Russian Christmas," this moralistic story shares some similarities to Dickens' "Christmas Carol" because the tsar has a sobering dream where he learns just how his actions have impacted others. Initially, he was flippant and nonchalant about the laws he was passing, but he recognizes how his choices can literally kill others; in the end, he is presented with three choices: ignore the dream, imitate the West's political design with people and their representatives, or to establish God's kingdom here on earth (this last is clearly what the author advocates, but how this last would be attempted is unclear).
Since he allows the sale of alcohol, the entire nation from adults to children are utterly intoxicated, unable to refrain from drinking alcohol. I found this criticism a little preposterous; it ignores the fact that people have free will and don't need to be treated as children (the companion tells the tsar that another time, when the tsar says, "They are beasts," he responds saying, "No, they are children." Actually, they should be respected enough to make decisions for themselves. If they themselves can't control their behavior or think for themselves, what makes the tzar more capable? With this view, people clearly should not be delegated and have representatives because they are too ignorant. But what exactly gives the tzar more credibility when he can't even keep himself from falling asleep?
When the tzar awakes, in desperation he cries out, "How can I put an end to all this evil? It is bound up with the very existence of the State. I am the head of the State! What am I to do?" He recognizes the corruption in the state and how responsible and ineffectual he and the government are.
But if the government is ineffective and the people are incapable, what really is left? I guess the author's point is that God himself should rule, and this can be done by establishing His kingdom on earth, but this is an ideal and not reality.
This is one of Tolstoy's short stories. I listened to this story a couple of times. It's posted by Neural Surfer (Prof David Christopher Lane) on You Tube.
Tolstoy relates in detail, the dreams of a young emperor, who wakes up from his dreams in confusion, being conflicted because of his duties and responsibilities of an emperor. In his dreams, the young Tsar is taken on journeys that 'messes' with his head. Can he make the a moral decision to change the way he rules and leads. The setting is 19th Century Russia and the story ends with --- we will know in 50 years.
========================================================================== Aside: In the bibliography of Rosamund Bartlett's book, Tolstoy: A Russian Life, she references Roza Lyuksemburg, who said that Tolstoy wanted full economic and social equality, a complete abolition of militarism, brotherhood of nations, universal peace etc. he showed the stubbornness of a great and vehement prophet. Another reference, mentioned by Rosamund Bartlett is William Thomas Stead, who stated that Tolstoy was ... a man of genius who spends his time in planting potatoes and cobbling shoes, a great literary artist ...
A very interesting and thought provoking story revolving a young Tsar recently come to the position. The story does not state exactly which Tsar it is, but, potentially Nicholas II.
The story looks at the early moments of becoming a Tsar and his awakening of his role, responsibilities and the overall power he has. What to do and what path to take?
Ce recueil de quatre contes est facile et rapide à lire. L’auteur aborde des sujets divers comme les structures sociales ou encore le leadership et ses responsabilités. J’ai une préférence pour le conte « les mémoires d’un fou », j’apprécie la manière dont l’auteur décrit le piège des pensées excessives et compulsives du personnage.
Cela faisait bien longtemps que je n’avais pas lu Tolstoi et j’ai été très heureuse de me replonger dans sa prose. Par de petits contes, des touches de peintures sensibles et humaines, Tolstoi nous fait voyager dans tous les coins de la Russie, dans toutes les strates de la société, de quoi vous faire aller du grand sourire aux larmes.
A good short story about the choices a person in a position of power and authority has to make. According to Wikipedia the censors of Russian Emperor Nicholas II would not allow it to be printed at the time!
Evidently, Czar Nicholas II listened to the priest, only to be overthrown by those people he had formerly banished as unwelcome members of the criminal element.