This book started out as 5 stars and steadily deteriorated as I read along.
First impressions upon reading the synopsis was that it was a book for men, written by a man, explaining how masculinity is going to be defined in the near future, with women making unprecedented gains in equality and traditional ideas of masculinity being rejected. Sounds interesting, right?
Second impression was the title page, where he states that humanity is shifting from male to female dominance. So now I'm thinking this is going to be a paranoid Meninist manifesto, speaking to how women are taking over the world and how men need to fight lest they become extinct.
Then, I started the book. And it was neither of the above. Initially I was surprised but impressed by how the author cast women in such a positive light (especially after the flavor of that title page). He discussed how women are shattering the glass ceiling in the workplace and politics, how women are dominating in the academic world, and how women are experiencing sexual freedom and satisfaction unlike ever before. He also addresses less positive issues, such as the current wage gap and other gender-based issues that need to be changed. The feminist in me was rejoicing.
But then that roller coaster started it's downhill descent into absolute madness. An entire section was devoted to the idea that genetically, men are becoming extinct. Male DNA is destroying itself and female DNA was getting stronger by the minute. And no, this was not a metaphor.
He continued on through the chapters, putting women on a pedestal and ripping men to shreds. Again, initially, I found this entertaining. What woman wouldn't get a few laughs out of an entire chapter devoted to how men lie? It read like a caricature, except Myers was completely serious about it all. That's when I started to really examine the foundations of his arguments. Each and every male trait that he used to illustrate why men as a species are circling the drain was based in stereotypes. And, yes, stereotypes exist for a reason, but I feel that his selection of the worst attributes was unfair and even purposefully destructive. I realized that if I was reading a book that treated women this way, I would be livid. Also, I don't feel like men need to be torn down in order to make women look better. First of all, it is childish; second, women have enough strength and success to hold their own without having to sabotage their "competition."
I chose to give it three stars, as some of the book was not without its merits. But it would have been a much more enjoyable read, and the arguments would have been much stronger if it hadn't been for the needless annihilation of all things male. I'm not sure I would recommend this book widely. I feel that in the hands of a critical reader, it could be interesting. But in the hands of a reader who takes everything at face value, or an unreasonable feminist looking for any ammunition to use against men, it could be very damaging.