An interesting read overall, although it has its flaws. It feels overly complicated or unclear at times, some of the conclusions are a bit rushed or reductive, and not every specific topic is given due time given its relative interest imo- but whatever, if you have a passing interest in econ give a chapter a try and see if it grabs you. Some of it struck me as "well no crap" and other explanations were far different from what I would think, but over the course of the book there was definitely enough new material to keep me interested. It struck me as somewhere between freakonomics and a college supplemental textbook- it's definitely not light reading, but the concepts come through clearly enough where I felt I gained plenty. Last 4 chapters aren't the best, though- rebates, queues, and the gender pay gap. The rebates are just kinda boring and get two chapters, the queue chapter feels like it throws a lot at the wall and sticks with none of it, and the gender pay gap is such a complicated issue that even the insights offered feel like they don't really support a solid conclusion (something McKenzie says himself about this part, to be fair). So kinda a weak ending, but up through the chapter on prices ending in 9- eh, I found it all pretty interesting. Ps- pg 224/225 had a theory I found interesting, linking past survival instincts/abilities with current capitalism. It's barely touched upon, but the idea is basically that because those that produced quickly and efficiently put themselves in position to produce more (babies amongst other things), and that can be linked to our economic system of choice- I've just never seen the idea put so bluntly, and I also found it interesting McKenzie comes nowhere close to claiming this connection to be accurate- the way it's worded just says "it's no surprise then that we came up with and insisted on capitalism," something to that effect. Just an interesting part for me personally and one worth consideration- is capitalism a natural offshoot of survival instinct, and is it connected more in our minds than in reality? Is it outdated? Etc. I'd contend the connection to evolution makes sense, being able to produce more greater ensures your survival, but that it also might be outdated in today's age. Whatever, just a note for myself there, that part was barely touched upon but was probably the most interesting idea presented imo.