I did not read Hill's NOSA42, to which Wraith is a kind of prequel, I am told, an introduction to crazy Charlie Manx and his crazy horror scene, Christmasland, with all of his "babies," children psychos. This is Manx's dreamland, to which he takes people in his Wraith, his Rolls. This is a spare tale for back story, so the art takes the stage, and a bloody stage it is. I would say there is not really much more than a story's worth back story here… and an epilogue, but it feels sort if thin. I mean, his series Locke and Key develops characters and relationships in its horrorscape, and Wraith does less so here; it does give you some back story especially up front and at the end, and that stuff is chilling, but the substance of it, the depth compared to the slashery feels less to me. This feels like batshit crazy horror, and a wild ride, but correct me if I am wrong, but not as rich as some King/Hill horror can be in terms of human depth. I liked it, tuned the pages, read it fast, and it's good horror, and it's visually fun, and Charlie enters the pantheon of horror as a new crazy good character, but it doest yet achieve greatness. Maybe coupled with the novel? But you know, I'm not a real horror fan, not really. I read this because I liked Locke and Key, but this feels like here the Beast itself takes center stage, whereas the family and the complex key world took precedence in Locke.