What do you think?
Rate this book
Zašto se trebamo zvati kršćanima
Zašto se trebamo zvati kršćanima : liberalizam, Europa, etika : s pismom Benedikta XVI.
Zašto bismo se trebali zvati kršćanima? Danas smo liberali pa se zato ne treba pozivati na kršćanstvo da bismo opravdali svoja temeljna prava i slobode. Laici smo pa vjeru možemo smatrati privatnim uvjerenjem. Moderni smo pa držimo da čovjek sve mora sam bez ikakva vodstva koje ne potječe od njegova vlastitoga razuma. Djeca smo znanosti pa nam je dostatno pozitivističko, potvrđeno i dokazano znanje.
Ostalo se ne računa. Europa se ujedinjuje pa onda moramo izbjeći podjele spominjanjem kršćanstva među korijenima europskoga identiteta. U svijetu ponovno izbijaju vjerski ratovi, dakle moramo izbjeći raspirivanje novih žarišta. U vlastitoj kući integriramo milijune muslimana, dakle ne možemo tražiti masovna obraćenja na kršćanstvo. U našim zapadnjačkim društvima prolazimo fazu krajnje ekspanzije prava, dakle ne možemo dopustiti da se Crkva miješa i priječi njihovo uživanje. I tako dalje.
Ova knjiga namjerava odbaciti sve te pa i dakle. Nema dvojbe da su rašireni: čitamo ih u knjigama i novinama, slušamo ih na televiziji i u sveučilišnim predavaonicama, slušamo ih od tolikih intelektualaca, gledamo ih na djelu kod tolikih političara. Bombardira nas s tolikih strana ovo nijekanje vjere, posebice ovo otpadništvo od kršćanstva pa je pravo čudo da se netko još protivi. Ja se protivim. (…)
Moje je stajalište laika i liberala koji se obraća kršćanstvu pitajući ga o razlozima nade.
Zašto bismo se trebali zvati kršćanima? Danas smo liberali pa se zato ne treba pozivati na kršćanstvo da bismo opravdali svoja temeljna prava i slobode. Laici smo pa vjeru možemo smatrati privatnim uvjerenjem. Moderni smo pa držimo da čovjek sve mora sam bez ikakva vodstva koje ne potječe od njegova vlastitoga razuma. Djeca smo znanosti pa nam je dostatno pozitivističko, potvrđeno i dokazano znanje.
Ostalo se ne računa. Europa se ujedinjuje pa onda moramo izbjeći podjele spominjanjem kršćanstva među korijenima europskoga identiteta. U svijetu ponovno izbijaju vjerski ratovi, dakle moramo izbjeći raspirivanje novih žarišta. U vlastitoj kući integriramo milijune muslimana, dakle ne možemo tražiti masovna obraćenja na kršćanstvo. U našim zapadnjačkim društvima prolazimo fazu krajnje ekspanzije prava, dakle ne možemo dopustiti da se Crkva miješa i priječi njihovo uživanje. I tako dalje.
Ova knjiga namjerava odbaciti sve te pa i dakle. Nema dvojbe da su rašireni: čitamo ih u knjigama i novinama, slušamo ih na televiziji i u sveučilišnim predavaonicama, slušamo ih od tolikih intelektualaca, gledamo ih na djelu kod tolikih političara. Bombardira nas s tolikih strana ovo nijekanje vjere, posebice ovo otpadništvo od kršćanstva pa je pravo čudo da se netko još protivi. Ja se protivim. (…)
Moje je stajalište laika i liberala koji se obraća kršćanstvu pitajući ga o razlozima nade.
206 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2008
9 people are currently reading
49 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
May 19, 2018
Marcello Pera's short book is dense and closely argued. Decrying the increasing secularization of Europe, his argument serves as a warning to America. If classical liberal ideas, which gave rise to the West and were espoused by America's founding fathers—like the notion that truly free societies are rooted in the soil of religious sentiments—are abandoned in the United States, as they have been in most of Europe, then we can expect to go the way of Europe: toward ever increasing government bureaucracy, ever increasing moral decay, and ever increasing loss of liberty.
September 23, 2025
Un liberal agnóstico que quiere utilizar el cristianismo para sus fines. En algunas partes tiene razón, en otras se ve lo ideológico por encima de lo teológico. por cierto, le endiña a John Stuart Mill cosas que no dijo, ni afirmó, para justificar sus cosas de partido berlusconiano.
August 31, 2014
The author, Italian, is struggling with the current state of Europe: the rise of secularism, the decline of affirmation in the importance or role of Christianity in society, and the penetration of Muslim non-assim-ilating communities in the heart of Europe. What does this mean for Europe, but also for Western Civilization? In the beginning he provides the reader with an excellent introduction to the shaping of modern classical liberal thinking in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Classical liberalism, being different from modern liberalism, in that it favored limited government, and individual rights and liberties.
Unfortunately, the book gets bogged down as the author ties to sort out the path he is going to take and trying to set up in the reader an understanding of the forces at play here. It has slowed down after a first few chapters.
The later part of the book does pick up. However, it is more a discussion and dissection of the failure of modern progressive liberalism to present a coherent political philosophy that can hold modern society together. The collapse of Western Society, having been projected since the later 1930s, it is more of a slow decay, is in part perpetuated by the modern nihilistic philosophies starting from the mid-to-late 19th century. What Pera hints at, though not strongly demonstrating, is that Christendom provided Europe with a rich reservoir ideas, truths, and traditions to slow the decay. However, this reservoir is not being replenished in the modern era. Will Europe balkanize as urban areas are captured by Muslim communities who demand their own courts, laws, schools, etc? Will the EU dismantle sovereign counties, with their unique Western / Christian political and cultural institutions to be replaced by one Ubur Bureaucratic State? Pera does an excellent job presenting the problems facing Europe, much of which is a wound self-inflicted by the vacuous philosophies of relativism and multiculturalism.
The problem with this book is similar to the charge faced by G.K. Chesterton when he wrote his book - Heretics. One critic charged Chesterton - now that you told what is wrong with the world, tell us what is right. I think the same charge can be leveled against Pera. There are multiple books about the problem of modern philosophies and the damage they are doing to politics and society. What we need more of are books on why we should go back to our Christian roots. What ideas, structures, premises found in historic Christendom should we be examining and discussing? How does these ideas distinguish the West from the Rest (To use a title from a book by the British philosopher Roger Scruton.) Surely, Pera would not want a priestly class to rule over the political class. As a Catholic I wouldn't want the pope, Francis or any other, running governments. However, what we need is the admittance of religion and its open discussion in the public square and as force in the market place of ideas. There the various religious theological and philosophical frameworks can be examined along with any other framework - political, social, economic, etc - to be accepted, rejected, or modified. However, when we are told that religious convictions have no place in the public square, that they are purely personal (which is a self-serving barrier on open discussion placed by those opposed to religion)and should be kept personal, that smacks of totalitarianism and fear, though supposedly with a smiling face. Here is the real problem - the attempt to silence religious ideas, specifically Christian ideas as Pera and others in Europe and the US have noted. We must fight to allow these ideas to be expressed openly in society, to challenge the relativistic, materialistic modern framework and allow for Chesterton's romance of Orthodoxy to again become a force in Europe and the West.
Unfortunately, the book gets bogged down as the author ties to sort out the path he is going to take and trying to set up in the reader an understanding of the forces at play here. It has slowed down after a first few chapters.
The later part of the book does pick up. However, it is more a discussion and dissection of the failure of modern progressive liberalism to present a coherent political philosophy that can hold modern society together. The collapse of Western Society, having been projected since the later 1930s, it is more of a slow decay, is in part perpetuated by the modern nihilistic philosophies starting from the mid-to-late 19th century. What Pera hints at, though not strongly demonstrating, is that Christendom provided Europe with a rich reservoir ideas, truths, and traditions to slow the decay. However, this reservoir is not being replenished in the modern era. Will Europe balkanize as urban areas are captured by Muslim communities who demand their own courts, laws, schools, etc? Will the EU dismantle sovereign counties, with their unique Western / Christian political and cultural institutions to be replaced by one Ubur Bureaucratic State? Pera does an excellent job presenting the problems facing Europe, much of which is a wound self-inflicted by the vacuous philosophies of relativism and multiculturalism.
The problem with this book is similar to the charge faced by G.K. Chesterton when he wrote his book - Heretics. One critic charged Chesterton - now that you told what is wrong with the world, tell us what is right. I think the same charge can be leveled against Pera. There are multiple books about the problem of modern philosophies and the damage they are doing to politics and society. What we need more of are books on why we should go back to our Christian roots. What ideas, structures, premises found in historic Christendom should we be examining and discussing? How does these ideas distinguish the West from the Rest (To use a title from a book by the British philosopher Roger Scruton.) Surely, Pera would not want a priestly class to rule over the political class. As a Catholic I wouldn't want the pope, Francis or any other, running governments. However, what we need is the admittance of religion and its open discussion in the public square and as force in the market place of ideas. There the various religious theological and philosophical frameworks can be examined along with any other framework - political, social, economic, etc - to be accepted, rejected, or modified. However, when we are told that religious convictions have no place in the public square, that they are purely personal (which is a self-serving barrier on open discussion placed by those opposed to religion)and should be kept personal, that smacks of totalitarianism and fear, though supposedly with a smiling face. Here is the real problem - the attempt to silence religious ideas, specifically Christian ideas as Pera and others in Europe and the US have noted. We must fight to allow these ideas to be expressed openly in society, to challenge the relativistic, materialistic modern framework and allow for Chesterton's romance of Orthodoxy to again become a force in Europe and the West.
Currently reading
April 2, 2012Recommended to us by Dr. Mary Poplin...just began to read. Fascinating.
July 16, 2012
An Italian "liberal" (which means "conservative" in American English) praising the US for keeping God (and "Christianity") in our government. What.
January 2, 2014
Poor logic on behalf of the author made this book philosophically irrelevant.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews