Reformation historian and Calvin biographer Bruce Gordon writes the “biography” of Calvin’s Institutes. He documents the history of the writing of the book and its continued legacy from its contemporary reception to its interpretation in the modern era. The historical theme I found from this book is that Calvin (and his Institutes) is a wax nose. Depending on the era it is received, everyone shapes Calvin into their Calvin and claims legitimate interpretation. This ranges from figures such as Schleiermacher to Barth, seminaries such as the Hegelian Mercersburg Seminary (Nevin and Schaff) to Princeton Seminary (Hodge & Warfield), and political movements of opposite goals like the pro-apartheid theologians and anti-apartheid theologians of South Africa.
Writing the book:
“Calvin didn’t create the book ex nihilo”..Several books served as models for the Institutes: Lactantius’ Institutes, Melanchthon's Loci Communes, & Lombard’s Sentences (Page 19)
Themes of the Institutes:
The Institutes is a book of Knowledge: knowledge of God, Christ, and self. (36)
Twofold Knowledge-- Calvin: “Our wisdom, in so far as it ought to be deemed true and solid Wisdom, consists almost entirely of two parts: the knowledge of God and of ourselves.” (38)
Predestination: “the doctrine of predestination simply flowed from Romans, Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and Luther; he (Calvin) never saw himself saying anything new.” (42)
Enlightenment response:
Similarity between Calvin & Kant--Both spoke of knowledge, in different ways, in order to save religion. They sought truth by dispelling false speculation and error. “For Kant, religious belief could be called knowledge, because it is true only subjectively…Religious belief is not false, but should be understood as falling between knowledge and opinion.” (71)
State of Geneva during the Enlightenment--Catholic visitor to Geneva in 1728: “Of the thirty-three theology students bound for the ministry, I met only five or six who were true Calvinists. The others were Socinian, Arminian, or Pelagian and I could name a few who thumbed their nose at everything religious.” (73)
The Curious Case of Jacobus Capitein (1717-1747): a slave from Ghana who was brought to the Netherlands, educated at the University of Leiden, and returned home as a missionary.
His dissertation defended the idea that Christian liberty and slavery were not at odds with one another. Calvin’s treatment of slavery and his opinions on Scripture were the “final authority for Capitein” (74-77)
19th century Reception:
There was a revival in the thought and popularity of Calvin in the 19th Century, primarily led by Friedrich Schleiermacher (92)
South African reception:
Calvin (& Kuyper’s interpretation) became an underlying foundation for South African apartheid.
Meanwhile Barth, Naude, & Niesel’s reading supported equal rights and the anti-apartheid movement.
Calvin “was not a defender of the status quo…he was a champion of the refugees and the weak and poor” (173)
4/5 Very interesting and insightful book