A friend of mine suggested to me that Economics of the Undead is probably of more relevance to those interested in economics than horror literature. I tend to agree with him. However, I also firmly believe there is plenty in this volume to entertain both groups. Also, as someone who has never thought much about the subject, I was pleasantly surprised to discover how fun and accessible economics could be!
Economics of the Undead: Zombies, Vampires and the Dismal Science is a collection of essays by economists and literary theorists edited by Glen Whitman and James Dow. Basing their evidence on Vampires and Zombies from popular culture, the writers explore the real-world implications of the behaviours of the undead, such as the likelihood of a total Zombie apocalypse, the logic behind Vampire blood addiction, and the best strategy to woo and win an undead beau.
Overall I found this collection to be excellent. While some of the essays were better written than others, they were all very engaging and worth reading. Stand-out essays include “Eating Brains and Breaking Windows” by Steven Horwitz and Sarah Skwire which successfully deconstructs the argument that war (Zombie or otherwise) can ever be economically advantageous, and Daniel Farhat’s essay “Between Gods and Monsters: Reason, Instinct and the Artificial Vampire” which demonstrates how algorithms can be used to predict future attacks from Vampires (or indeed other intruders such as burglars). I also particularly loved the final essay in the collection, “Killing Time: Dracula and Social Discoordination” by Hollis Robbins, which is a fantastic reading of Bram Stoker’s Dracula as a struggle between natural time governed by the sun and moon and institutionalised Greenwich Mean Time.
My only criticism is that the collection perhaps relies too much on certain case studies to support its arguments. In particular, The Walking Dead and Buffy the Vampire Slayer are discussed to death. I understand that these are staples of undead fiction, but at the same time I would have liked to see the essays dealing with a larger array of popular culture – even just to provide me with recommendations for further reading and viewing. For example, I was fascinated to learn about the 2010 Vampire film Daybreakers, and would love to have even more movies to add to my “to view” list.
Perhaps the best part of Economics of the Undead is that it links what is so often considered an “escapist” genre to the real world. As outlined above, many of the theories that are applied to the undead figures also have practical applications. Thus we are brought full circle as the volume gives us a deeper sense of why Vampire and Zombie narratives resonate so deeply with us humans. All in all, this collection is a wonderful link between two subjects that are usually considered so disparate, and it is encouraging to think that there is so much scope for research such as this. I would love to read similar volumes regarding the economics of the post-apocalyptic and sci-fi genres, and would recommend this collection highly to any undead or economic enthusiast!