Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Drugs, Oil & War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia & Indochina

Rate this book
Peter Dale Scott's brilliantly researched tour de force illuminates the underlying forces that drive U.S. global policy from Vietnam to Colombia and now to Afghanistan and Iraq. He brings to light the intertwined patterns of drugs, oil politics, and intelligence networks that have been so central to the larger workings of U.S. intervention and escalation in Third World countries through al liances with drug-trafficking proxies. The result has been a staggering increase in global drug traffic. Thus, the author argues, the exercise of power by cover t means, or parapolitics, often metastasizes into deep politics - the interplay of unacknowledged forces that spin out of the control of the original policy ini tiators. Scott contends that we must recognize that U.S. influence is grounded n ot just in military and economic superiority but also in so-called soft power. W e need a soft politics of persuasion and nonviolence, especially as America is e mbroiled in yet another disastrous intervention, this time in Iraq.

248 pages, Paperback

First published March 1, 2003

15 people are currently reading
1054 people want to read

About the author

Peter Scott

296 books4 followers
This is NOT the famous naturalist, sportsman, and founder of the World Wildlife Fund. He is listed under his full name:
Peter Markham Scott

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
42 (38%)
4 stars
39 (35%)
3 stars
18 (16%)
2 stars
9 (8%)
1 star
1 (<1%)
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews
Profile Image for Samuel.
35 reviews5 followers
May 12, 2015
I was originally really gung-ho to read this book because of the subject matter. That faded fast. The author's incessant need to cite himself, his general reliance on secondary sources rather than primary sources, citation overkill and writing style (I suppose) made this a really tough read for me.

I agree with an earlier assessment that the book was "too conspiracy". Maybe the author knew that going in which is why he was bound and determined to cite this book to death; I'm talkin to the tune of something like 150 per 40 pages or so, half of which were to himself; or at least that's my best ballpark guess.

This book was painful for me to read, and I assume I'm not alone in this; which is disappointing because like I said earlier, the subject matter interests me so much.
Profile Image for Brian Bigelow.
Author 36 books60 followers
April 16, 2016
I don't believe all of the drug assertions but as a rule when the US military gets involved in a country drug production flourishes. That's a fact.
I'm surprised the tire manufacturing in Vietnam wasn't mentioned. In the 1950's almost all the tires sold in the US was made in Vietnam. There was attempts made to protect that production. Of course, since then those manufacturing concerns moved to Venezuela.
Profile Image for Kevin.
263 reviews
March 31, 2025
“…the use of illegal narcotics networks to fight communism, resorted to by capitalists in Shanghai in 1927 and in Southeast Asia in the 1950s, seems without our knowledge to have been sanctioned inside the United States.”

Political power and money drive official and unofficial US policy. Peter Dale Scott brings the receipts to demonstrate close connections between big business, often oil, and US leadership and how different parts of the US government, intelligence and military may attempt to implement policies at odds with each other.

Scott points out that where American military and CIA are involved, there’s often an increase in illegal drug traffic ex. China, Vietnam, Colombia, Afghanistan and that the US often aligns with those who may profit from the drug traffic.
Profile Image for Fernando.
226 reviews
September 11, 2021
More than anything I was curious about CIA's secret operations in Central Asia which goes back to the early 70's - A combination of american lobbying, opium, oil and anticommunism-. Among its closest allies that fan out in Afghanistan were Bin Laden, Mujahideens and the Taliban. CIA's involvement in drugs trade has been a mistery to me for years. But seem quite plausible that drug triangulation serves as collateral finance for not burning american taxpayer dollars
95 reviews1 follower
May 11, 2017
Scott is the real deal. An intellectual who tells the truth even if it pisses off the military industrial complex, the prison industrial complex, and the cocaine importation agency (CIA).
Profile Image for Alex podge.
16 reviews1 follower
September 19, 2021
Basically the most dense historical account of how deep politics operated in the 20th century. An expanded version of this book that goes into CIA drug trafficking in Nicaragua and Kosovo would be incredible, especially since the reasons for US intervention in Kosovo have a lot to do with the oil pipelines from the Middle East. This book actually explains some of the complex tactics that people in and outside of the CIA used to manipulate presidents like Eisenhower into getting involved in Vietnam.
Profile Image for Jacob.
145 reviews
December 13, 2020
This book is very academic and dry. Every sentence has important information and it was slow reading for me. I wouldn't go into the book blind either, it helps to have some background on the Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern wars with the US. His thesis is great and I am convinced he is correct: that the United States allies with drug cartels to destabilize the countries who's resources they want control of. At the same time using the money they make from the cartels to fund further covert involvement.

The introduction and chapter on Afghanistan were really great. I learned a lot about Afghanistan and how the US relationship changed over time. A good background of CIA involvement with the Taliban and Mujahideen. The Colombia chapter was interesting but felt scattered to me, I know the least about it. I didn't read much of the last chunk of the book on Southeast Asia because it was extremely descriptive and felt like more detail than I needed.
35 reviews
February 18, 2008
Another book you should stay away from if you want to maintain your illusions about the sanity of the ruling classes.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.