In my own opinion, I consider the novel "quid pro quo" an excellent book with a humorous and intriguing plot.It's written for a young adult audience, but clever, suspenseful, and funny enough to keep adults reading until the end. the story line of the novel is quite interesting, with a lot of suspense, and well-plotted legal trills. The author had also done a great job putting all the pieces of the crime scenes together to make the suspect the suspect. Although the novel is about solving mysteries and doing "legal puzzles", it doesn't bored people at all because of its humor and drollness, which is also a part the author had done a great job with. She manages to make the book serious while having humor inside that will make the readers die out of laughter. For example, "I spent the whole night getting ready. I tried to think what I needed. A knife? A crowbar? A cat-o'-nine-tails?" The novel also has some clever plots that will make you feel surprised and shocked. After saying all that, there are still few things that I dislike about the novel, one Involving the journey Cyril went to find his mother. In the journey, the author included some unnecessary stuff that doesn't have to be mentioned, including looking for the old law office customers and going through all the troubles just to find a definition of a word. I believe all those shouldn't have been in the novel, it will just bored the reader, and make the plot weaker by using uninteresting materials in the novel. For example, in the novel, Cyril was trying to figure out the definition for the word "Estoppel", so he went through all the makes ups, and disguise just to get to the library without anyone noticing him, where he could've just search it on a computer. Summing up, the whole novel was just fantastic, it gave me a lot of knowledge about legal laws and rights, while keeping me awake and laughing on the floor. Highly recommended to every teenagers 11 and up.