Joseph Goldstein read the amazingly good and extremely detailed Satipattana: The Direct Path to Realization by the monk, Analayo and was inspired to offer a long series of talks and discussions based upon it that became the basis of Goldstein's book under review. I have assigned Analayo's book to students of mine who are involved in dharma training to become a dharma teacher and it is brilliant. However, it is also very academic/scholarly and not an easy read, especially for anyone not already fairly well-versed in the teachings of the Buddha. Goldstein, without dumbing down the material, has digested it and offers a much more reader-friendly, accessible account of this profound practice. He does this by getting personal, and offering tales from his own life and from the practice experiences of his students.
The only reason I gave this book 4 rather than 5 stars is that Goldstein also, like many contemporary Buddhist teachers, flinches at times from the radical implications of anatta (the "not-self" teaching of the Buddha) as well as showing a "suspension of disbelief" that in my opinion turns away from what we know about the physical laws of nature. In a book over 400 pages, my first significant criticism doesn't arise until page 249 where, in talking about rapture, he says "In the Buddhist texts, there are many stories of people levitating in the air. Although this may be outside the range of our own experience, according to the teachings and from actual accounts of advanced yogis, this can happen either as a spontaneous manifestation or through mastery of this uplifting rapture." No, it can't! This is a concretizing of a phenomenological subjective experience. I have felt like I was levitating many times in meditation, but what we know of physics, this is just not plausible. If a student told me, like one told Goldstein that, "as he was doing lying-down meditation in his room, he felt his body actually rise a couple of inches off the bed" I would tell him that such sensations can be relatively common and ask him what he noted while experiencing this, which is ultimately what Goldstein said: "Did you note it?" But in Goldstein's case, he writes "I didn't know whether it was just a perception of floating or if it really happened." We might expect better from a scientifically literate person.
But, my biggest, and most serious criticism is when he talks about how some Thai masters teach of "a distinction made between the consciousness that is included in the five aggregates and that arises dependent on one of the six sense objects, and another kind of consciousness... beyond the aggregates." The Buddha repeatedly said that there was no self to be found in the skandhas (aggregates) or outside them and in speaking of consciousness, he emphasized again and again as he does in the nagara-sutta, "When there is name-and-form (nāma-rūpa, the collective name of the five skandhas) then consciousness exists; with name-and-form as condition, there is consciousness." That some Thai masters teach otherwise is evidence of how challengingly radical the concept of anatta is that even Buddhist teachers flinch and assert what some critics call a "subtle atman."
My last criticism that I feel significant is for those practitioners who do not accept rebirth, or the continuity of consciousness from one body to another. Goldstein asks, "...if we consider the possibility of rebirth and other planes of existence, would it change in any way how we live, the choices we make, the stress or ease in our lives?" and then shares that in accepting rebirth as a reality, has "taken a certain pressure off my life" in that "If I don't become an expert skier in this life, or whatever the desire may be, maybe I'll accomplish it in the next." REALLY???? First of all, in the traditional Buddhist understanding of rebirth -- which is not the same thing as reincarnation, it isn't the same personality that is reborn (it's not completely separate or different, but definitely also not the same and if you don't remember previous lives, what difference does it make if you become a sky expert in the next life? You don't have any recollection of that being a goal in the previous life... Besides, I don't need to believe in rebirth to "prioritize what seems important without thinking that I'm missing out on other things I don't get to do" which is apparently the benefit such belief gives Goldstein.
So, with these criticisms aside, this is still a really good book and one I assign in my Mindfulness Yoga Training. If you wish to go beyond the superficial and distorted McMindfulness that has grown so viral, and learn about the deeper analytical aspects of the meditation taught by the Buddha, this is the book for you.
UNLESS you wish to go to his source and check out the even deeper presentation of Analayo.