Diet books should really be reviewed months after reading. Once you know if the advice actually works. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, to use a wildly ironic idiom. That said, I was very attracted to Whitten's advice. It's an "expulsive power of a new affection" approach to dieting, and I like it. Rather than cut things out of your diet, add things. The right things. Look to maximize every calorie by eating whole, unprocessed foods. Use those to replace the addictive, "high reward" foods that compel you to overeat. I'll let you know how it goes.
Notes:
audible
Thesis: Fat Loss isn’t about will power and starvation. It's about biology.
The starvation programs of "The Biggest Loser" resulted in metabolic changes. Contestants' bodies were actually burning fewer calories after the show
Burns muscle. Causes fatigue, resulting in a desire to do less exercise.
Comparing food deprivation to sleep deprivation. Makes sense
Body weight is exactly the same as oxygen and sleep. It's biologically regulated.
Body fat set-point
Trying to clear away darkness with your hands
We didn't get fat because we consciously decided to start eating more. It's that our biology drove us to do so. We must eliminate the factors that caused us to do so.
Environmental factors are driving our biology to overeat calories.
When we gain weight, our bodies are "defending" a higher set point
Low calorie/low carb diet traps
Author says when caloric intake is equal, there is no difference between weight loss on calorie vs. carb restricted diets.
Lower the bodies set-point? Personal note: dubious promise
When non-obese cultures move to the western world, they suddenly become obese.
Highly "rewarding" foods work like addictive drugs
A high food reward diet drives overconsumption of calories and leads to obesity.
We can tell this is going on because we find ourselves eating for the neurological pleasure -- not because our bodies need the food (In other words, because we're hungry)
We get fat because we become neurologically addicted to processed foods.
We can be "full", but only for specific foods. It's why you can eat desert even when you're "stuffed"
No need to limit salt
Too much food variety drives chronic overconsumption
Rather than asking "what should I remove from my diet", ask "What are the ideal sources of nutrients that support optimal metabolic function"
Intentionally seeking out ideal sources of nutrients
making food recommends. Not because they're bad, but because they're not optimal. For instance, veggies for carbs over grains. Fish and eggs for protein instead of nuts, legumes. Butter and olive oil for fat instead of nuts.
Says Gary Taubes is just wrong
Forced caloric deprivation by restricting calories and upping exercise results in short-term weigh loss but at the cost of metabolic damage.
Personal note: I need to find ways to move more
Sitting = metabolism slowdown
Recommends a diet entirely comprised of whole, unprocessed foods
Processed foods overrides the body set point because it allows you to consume a lot more calories before feeling full
overcome your food addictions by giving in to your cravings. Want something sweet? Eat something sweet. Want something fatty? Eat something fatty. But choose a whole, unprocessed foods
Eat simple meals
Sitting makes you sick and fat. Move your body as constantly as possible
Recommended meals should consist of: Animal proteins, fruits, and vegetables
The expulsive power of a new affection
Only eat when you're hungry. Quit eating when you're full
only snack if you have to
Give your body what it craves, but give it the best version