Jak děti zjistí, že slovo „pes“ označuje psa a ne třeba kočku, auto anebo člověka? Jak poznají, co znamenají slovesa „myslet“ nebo „věřit“, přídavná jména „dobrý“ či „bílý“, anebo třeba slova označující abstraktní jevy, jako jsou „hypotéka“ nebo „příběh“? Děti si slova osvojují poměrně rychle, obvykle bez toho, aby je to někdo explicitně učil. Porozumění významům slov je jedním ze základních problémů současného zkoumání lidského myšlení. Paul Bloom zastává přístup, že učení se významům slov je výsledkem interakce rozličných kognitivních a jazykových schopností, mezi něž patří schopnost porozumět záměrům druhých lidí, schopnost osvojit si abstraktní pojmy, schopnost porozumět syntaktické struktuře a určité obecnější schopnosti týkající se paměti a učení. Ačkoli ostatní vědci dosud spojovali učení se slovům s některou z těchto dovedností, Bloom je první, kdo ukazuje, že k úplnému porozumění slovům je potřeba všech těchto lidských schopností. Na to, aby si děti – ale i dospělí – osvojili i ta nejjednodušší slova, potřebují bohaté pojmové, sociální a jazykové dovednosti, které se vzájemně doplňují.
Paul Bloom is the Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology and Cognitive Science at Yale University. His research explores how children and adults understand the physical and social world, with special focus on morality, religion, fiction, and art. He has published more than a hundred scientific articles in journals such as Science and Nature, and his popular writing has appeared in the New York Times, the New Yorker, the Atlantic Monthly, Slate, Natural History, and many other publications. He has won numerous awards for his research and teaching. His newest book--Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil--is coming out in November. Paul Bloom lives in New Haven with his wife and two sons.
A very useful review of our understanding of child language acquisition circa 2000, still relevant today. (That it's still relevant today says as much about Bloom's presentation and writing style as it does about how enormously difficult it is to make progress in this field.) The contents of the book are about what you'd expect from an undergraduate introduction to language acquisition.
For non-specialists, it's worth knowing that Bloom stakes out an unconventional view — or at least a non-consensus view — in this book, attributing many different observed phenomena in language acquisition to a single underlying faculty of domain-general social reasoning. This view has gained strength in the 18 years since this book's publication, but can not yet be called a consensus.
In some chapters, the book goes into a perfect amount of detail — presenting a coherent narrative punctuated by bits of interesting and convincing evidence. Other chapters are practically evidence-free, leaning more toward philosophy than science. We can't exactly fault Bloom for this fact: we just don't have a clear understanding as a research field, for example, on how language and conceptual knowledge relate to one another in the first years of a child's life. I only wish Bloom would have done a bit more epistemic signaling here — explicitly marking those places where the text contains far more opinion than fact.
Loved this book. It doesn't matter whether you agree with Bloom's position on how children learn words or not, and it doesn't even matter if he has left out some of the references. The book is a very nice summary of decades of efforts in the developmental area concerning word learning. It's written very clearly and logically, as opposed to listing tons of studies without a coherent story of how they relate to one another. I like the organization of the chapters, and it does an excellent job of conveying the important details, without putting you to sleep.
Somewhat dated in terms of it sources--as much work continues to be done in areas of research re: autism, and neurological development studies--this is nonetheless an informative book that makes a plausible claim about how we learn, not just to read, but to make meanings of what we read.
I lost faith early on at the claim that linguists can’t be sure whether “gavagai” might not be just a clearing of the throat. In no language is articulating a string of vowels and consonants sonorously effective for this purpose, especially vowels that open stretch the mouth so. Clearing the throat requires movement of the throat.
Read for a review paper for my Linguistics class, but I'd say readable enough for even a non-specialist. Bloom provides more detail than I ever had considered on child acquisition of words, with particular detail to how the psychological "theory of mind" could help explain child lexical acquisition without resorting to overly restrictive models of innate cognition. A lot of the data he references suffer from being only from English, but he acknowledges that's the state of things.
As an ECE specialist, I enjoyed furthering my understanding of the variety of ways to introduce language and literacy to young children. Bloom did not say other methods were detrimental, only that they may not be as productive. It's nice to see a change from the typical Erikson-Piaget-Skinner theories early educators typical dabble in.
Love this book. Has a great chapter on theory of mind that includes the deficit in children on the autism spectrum. All around great read for those interested in language development.