8/3/25 Update: Just to say that for the first time since it came out in 1989, I last night saw the Patrice LeConte film based on this novel, featuring Michel LeBlanc and Sandrine Bonnaire, and loved it I mean, it is skillfully noir, and also creepy and twisty in terms of expectations. Alfred Hitchcock once said that all film is voyeurism (recall the opening scene of Psycho, where we zoom into a hotel room where two people are dressing after having had sex; we are voyeurs, we're interested. In this story, the guy is a loner, a "window voyeur" who watches a woman in the apartment across their courtyard. I also happen to have just reread a kind of voyeur novella, Thomas Mann's Death in Venice, where an older man watches but never really physically engages with a young boy he finds beautiful ( recall seeing the film version of that book, with Dirk Bogarde, in the seventies). I am completely coincidentally reading Patricia Highsmith's The Cry of An Owl ,which also features a window voyeur! What is going on here??!!
Hitchcock's point about all this is that because we agree to also watch the watcher, we are in some sense implicated in the voyeurism. We "like to watch," as the Peter Sellers character says in Being There. At one point the Sandra Bonnaire character in the film says to the guy, "I like it that you watch me," thus supposedly making it "okay," in some sense that we also like to watch her. The film is advertised as an "erotic thriller" though it is rated PG-13, in this country. Hitch's Rear Window has a scenario similar to Hire's, a man watching his neighbors across a courtyard. Doubtless Hitchcock and Simenon knew each other's stories.
My original review: Glenn, my friend here on Goodreads, sent me a list of his five favorite Simenon books that are not Maigret stories (and most seasoned Simenon fans agree--and he'd probably agree himself--that his non-Maigret books are usually his best) and this is on that list. Roman durs, or hard novels, Simenon called them. Also called Monsieur Hire's Engagement (1933), I saw the movie 1n 1989 by Patrice Laconte, starring Sandra Bonnaire and Michel Blanc, and loved it and was glad to have finally read it. It's a shadowy book, lurking in the corners of our minds, dealing with secret lusts and desires but also about public assumptions and condemnations about these things. It's one of my fave books of the year. Maybe not quite up to the standard of Simenon's The Blue Room, but it's close. We are manipulated into judging all the characters. We are not morally "above" anyone in this story.
A woman--a prostitute--has been murdered, so loner Hire begins to get some attention; he once was jailed for his work for a book publisher on erotic novels, he lives alone and occasionally sees prostitutes. We all will have different views on this behavior, placing him on some continuum of reprehensible behavior, but does this make him a likely murderer? Some of the police and neighbors seem to think he should be a suspect. He's short, "overweight," and is seen by some of his neighbors as creepy, and many of us will see him as creepy, tooo, I suspect.
There's another thing that Hire does that occurs in societal shadows; in his apartment he can see into the apartments near him, and one woman in an apartment across from him undresses without hiding herself, and he watches this. Creepy? Rising to the level of assault? But what about her? Where on the continuum of sinfulness do we place her behavior? At one point she acknowledges she sees him looking at her and in time, they get together, at her invitation, but not to have sex. The woman, Alice, reports she has a troubling, possibly abusive, relationship with a man; maybe she is looking for a friend?
At the same time, Hire notes that he is being followed by a detective. It is clear he is a suspect in the murder, and he wants to leave the city; he suggests to Alice that she might leave town with him so they can both escape (she from her boyfriend, but because he says he loves her). So much of what happens here is about mood, tone, shadowy behavior, unclear relationships, with little said. Noir territory. The detective, too, gets involved with Hire's neighbor, the detective watching a possibly creepy Hire and at the same time maybe seeming a little creepy himself as he watches the suspect, though the woman he begins to see seems like she doesn't love the relationship. The man grabs her and grinds into her when he meets her; she doesn't want this, though on some level she likes the attention; she is lonely, all these folks are lonely, and these ways of handling desire are complicated, unsatisfying, but human, whatever that designatin may be worth. These two relationships are set up as a way of examining desire in (mostly) isolation.
As with The Blue Room, but also quite differently, Monsieur Hire's Engagement concludes with the relation of dramatic events, and in both books, it is not absolutely clear what has happened, who is "at fault," though in Hire's story, he is a victim of derision and hate from his neighbors, who decide he is the murderer. But things are not all that clear. Maybe that's the point of these shadowy noir stories, that nothing is ever completely clear, except that no one is completely innocent. Great book that is meant to make you uncomfortable as you join the neighbors--or not--in making judgements about these characters.