Ok, so I hope Micthard doesn't read her Goodreads reviews. And I know I have never written a book, so who the heck am I to judge? And I generally try to be cognizant of that when write reviews here. I am just a reader, and I enjoyed it or I didn't for a multitude of reasons. To each his own. But I know I am not going to be very kind in this review. I think I have only given 3 other books one star, and one of those was a first time author, so he gets a pass.
I picked up this book because I really liked Deep End Of The Ocean. I am looking back at my 5-star review and I guess I loved it. But this book is , in many ways, the opposite of Deep End, and not just because Deep End was great, and this is terrible. Deep End is all about what happens when a three-year-old boy is taken from his family. This book is about a three-year-old boy who is taken, but the protagonist is the man doing the taking. It’s not as menacing as it seems (we learn) but still, I was appalled that Frank Mercy (ex-cop) had no qualms about just absconding with a child of unknown origins (rationalized and explained away later), especially given the subject matter of Deep End.
But that does not begin to scratch the surface of my distaste for this book. In a nutshell, I found rampant inconsistencies (as if it was unedited) and I found most of the plot and the characters’ actions totally unbelievable. In fact, I thought that the seemingly most far-fetched aspect, i.e. the boys’ “supernatural” powers, was the most consistent, interesting, and well-written aspect, indeed that is what made me push through to finis the novel. But mostly everything else made no sense to me.
There were so many inconsistencies! I’m talking about the little details that make a story cohesive. We are told that Claudia is on sabbatical to pursue her Olympic dreams, but a few pages later, she is at work. When Frank takes up with Claudia, he asks someone, “can you believe a doctor would want to be with a guy like me?” Huh? Wasn’t his deceased wife a doctor? At the end, the “professor” kills Glory Bee’s foal, yet the “dark-skinned guy” who was first introduced as the “dark-haired” guy is the one charged with that crime with no explanation.
But those small inconsistencies, while maddening (!) were less bothersome to me than the bigger plot points. We have barely met Frank (and not met Natalie at all) when the Tsunami hits. Frank never grieves over Natalie, takes off with the boys, puts his trust in the drifter Patrick (whom I assumed all along would turn out to be the villain, since Frank entrusts him implicitly though he barely knows him) and takes off for America in the first few pages. My head was spinning. Finally, he gets to his family farm and I think, now we will settle in to the meat of the story. But I still don’t know what this book was about or the point. Claudia appears out of nowhere and despite losing the love of his life 6 months ago, Frank not only hooks up with her, but marries Claudia a year and a week after Natalie’s death. And Claudia? She’s a psychiatrist/professor with dreams of being an Olympic horse jumper (already a bit much), who tosses all of that aside for a man (and boy) she just met? And Frank himself is hard to believe-an ex-cop, reluctant horse-trainer, turned willing horse –trainer in Australia where he is also a volunteer fireman. Huh?
I have to stop writing I’m sorry I disliked this book so much. I was as lost at the ending as I was at the beginning. I do not recommend.