The Master is basically the Gospels in "Novel form" written from the perspective of John. We see the story of the Gospels thru the eyes of John. I enjoyed this retelling of the Gospels, as somebody who is trying to get more exposed to the Gospels, I found this a good way to hear the Jesus story again. It does a good job in making the Gospels accessible to modern readers. One big doubt or question of the Gospels is how we did the Gospels writers learn about the private convos of Jesus. For example, how did the Gospels writers know about Jesus and Nicodemus. In that situation, I imagine Nicodemus told the Gospel writers about his convo. But for other convos, such as between Pontius Pilate and Jesus. How do we know what they said? I doubt Pontius Pilate told the Gospels writers. In this story, it shows Pontius Pilate and Jesus talked in public, among on-lookers, so John got to hear what they said. In "The Passion of the Christ", it shows Jesus and Pontius Pilate talk in a dungeon and it is private. In other parts of the book, where something happened private between Jesus and another person, the book just says "This was revealed by John, in later times in heaven, by God" Which seems like a cop out answer!
The book is similar to the Gospels, as there is isn't too much emotion. It doesn't read like a modern novel with lots of emotion that you feel thru the characters. So the book is NOT like The Chosen (TV show) sadly, which shows the journey of all the apostles and the struggles they go thru. So not much emotional weight when reading.
This book is still pretty good at showing the Gospel and it has helped me in continuing to learn the Gospels.