For assistance in the preparation of this second edition, I desire herewith to express my obligations to several friendsz  To the late Rev. L. G. Hasse, b.d., whose knowledge of Moravian history was profound, and who guided me safely in many matters of detail to the Rev. N. Libbey, m.a., Principal of the Moravian Theological College, Fairfield, for the loan of valuable books to the Rev. J. T. Mi'iller, D.D., Archivist at Herrnhut, for re vising part of the ms., and for many helpful suggestions to Mr. W. T. Waugh, m.a., fo-r assistance in correcting the proof-sheets, and for much valuable criticism to the members of the Moravian Governing Board, not only for the loan of books and documents from the Fetter Lane archives, but also for carefully reading through the ms. To the ministers who kindly supplied my pulpit for three months and last, but not least, to the members of my own congregation, who relieved me from some pastoral duties to enable me to make good speed with my task.
-Mild spoiler alert (because I talk mostly about the end)-
This was one of those books that, as I was reading it, I wondered why it wasn't better known. I was enjoying it, and appreciating all the threads woven together, and even the author's opinions and asides. Also, it's well written. And then, as I got toward the end of the book, I started having clues that what had been a history was becoming a championing of changes in the church in modern times - as seen from 1909 - to make it more 'broad' and more 'democratic.' It was sad, to see the author cheering on the changes that led to the church losing its footing and its vitality. He went from appearing to appreciating fidelity to Scripture (or at least an honest attempt at it), to wanting the church to not miss the waves of reforms washing through early 20th century society. It was jarring, but also instructive.
I am reminded of C.S. Lewis recommending the reading of old books because each age has its blind spots. Hutton, in this book, aiming to give us a history of the Moravian church, at the same time managed to give us a glimpse of some of the giddiness and blind spots of the late 1800s and early 1900s, especially among academics and other intellectuals; and a ringside seat to a once Christ-centered denomination losing sight of Jesus, and non-resistance, and church authority, and more.
I learned things I didn’t know, told in an engaging way. But my oh my, I had to wade through propaganda… well, at least the writer is clear about his biases.