In “Unparalleled” Jared C. Wilson sets out to accomplish exactly what the cover says; to show how Christianity’s uniqueness makes it compelling.
The book is made up of ten chapters, each addressing a specific topic springing from a “How….” question (i.e. “How the Christian God Is Not Like the Others”, “How the Reality of the Trinity Answers Deep Human Longing”, “How the Christian View of Humanity Is the Most Realistic”, “How Jesus Claimed To Be God”, ect).
Wilson does a good job compiling and explaining the topics. I do, however, think the best audience for this book is probably non-believers or young Christians, as the material has a very introductory feel to it. This is not a criticism, as I think it was his intent to start at ground level to illustrate what biblical Christianity is and what makes it unique.
It would be good for non-believers, as it provides an excellent outline of some of the things that are unique to the Christian worldview, shattering the “aren’t all religions basically the same” misconception. Likewise, I think this book could be particularly helpful to younger Christians looking to gain a clearer understanding of their faith, and its uniqueness/merits when compared to other ideologies.
Though that's the audience I feel it best suited for, obviously the book contains truths worth revisiting and pondering for any Christian. We should, after all, always be ready to answer why Christianity stands true in the face of so many other religious options. I found the chapter on the Trinity particularly helpful.
I enjoyed this book, and was thinking it would be the perfect book to share with others in order to start discussions, and maybe open doors of witness. I still think that’s the case, but I did hit upon a couple things that dampened my initial enthusiasm a bit.
Mostly it has to do with a few movie/celebrity mentions throughout. Whether its Roseanne Barr’s name included for a laugh (p.77), or describing a response of Jesus recorded in Mark 11 as being “Bourne-meets the Matrix level of rhetorical jujitsu” (p.121), or the couple other instances found throughout the book, they didn’t really land for me. The film Signs gets a mention as well, but it was used for illustration purposes, as opposed to just being present for humor, so I was less bothered by that than some of the others.
To highlight my point further, one of my main issues was the use of a discussion with Bono in chapter 8 regarding the difference between karma and grace (p.181-182). I’m not saying that Bono doesn’t have anything to contribute to the conversation, or that in the right context we couldn’t discuss what he says. But the fact of the matter is Bono’s quote had to be censored to even be included. To me, this book seems like a primer on the Christian faith, and I found myself questioning whether there wasn’t anyone who would have been better to cite here rather than a cursing Bono.
To be fair, the quote is cited as initially coming from a Christianity Today article, and that article was taken from the book Bono: In Conversation with Michka Assayas which is noted by Christianity Today to have “salty” language from both Bono and Assayas in it. So maybe my issue first falls to Christianity Today publishing an article promoting such a book from Bono.
I don’t mean to be overly critical, because I like the majority of what Wilson has to say, and am for the most part in agreement with him. I even enjoy that he has a sense of humor, and completely understand that it occasionally shows up in his writing. I’m just not sure all the references were appropriate within a book introducing the uniqueness of Christ and Christianity. I don’t think we should make a habit of using base things to illustrate holy things, and generally speaking, things from the entertainment world are definitely base things.
While I do disagree on this issue, I definitely think there’s room for grace, seeing his overall message and recognizing his intentions. After all, I'm sure an honest examination of myself would find instances of me failing to uphold the principle I'm stating here, so it's definitely not my intention to cast off on him. I would likely still recommend and share the book, but I would probably discuss some of my thoughts about the aforementioned issues when I did. Had those issues not been present I would have rated the book higher.
Below are a few quotes I liked from the book:
“By and large, people in my community have rejected organized religion and all that goes along with it, because they have determined that they can be “good people” just fine without it. And here’s the kicker: they can.
You can work on your positive energy output, on making sure the good side of your scales bears more weight than the bad side, all without the help of a church or a sacred book or any of the stuff that comes with an actual religion. You can be “spiritual but not religious”. And many try it. [….] They’ve figured out they don’t need the church to do any of those good things, and they’re pretty much right.
So it’s my job – and the job of every Christ following believer everywhere – to do the wonderful job of exploding all this tidiness with the most radical notion these folks have ever heard: trying to be good isn’t the point.” (p. 15)
"Thus, in every other religion where God is said to forgive, he has to do so by in some way compromising his holiness. In other words, he sort of tips the scale toward his mercy and away from his righteousness. He kind of "bends the rules". He sacrifices one part of himself in order that we might take advantage of another. But the God that Christians worship does not compromise one bit. He bends no rules. In fact, he punishes every single sin. Not a single sin throughout all of history slips through the cracks. So how can he forgive sinners like us while maintaining the perfection of his holiness? He puts our sin on Jesus Christ." (p. 30-31)
"In every other religion people seek God. Only in Christianity does God seek people." (p. 43)
“This is why Christians believe in the sacredness of human life – because God has made humankind his image-bearers, and whatever this means, it cannot mean because humankind is “useful”, but beautiful.” (p. 81)
“James Montgomery Boice said, “If you understand those two words – ‘but God’ – they will save your soul.” Two sweet words start the reversal of destiny. Two words that part the sea and roll back the darkness. Two little words like wings of a seraph, breaking through our tomb with a bright ray of light and lifting us up and through the spiritual aether, seating us in the “heavenly places” of Ephesians 2:6.” (p. 109)
“In the end, Christianity stands alone, not because it’s a “better religion” but because it speaks a better word. Christianity is unparalleled because Jesus Christ is.” (p. 229)