Like everything by Bauckham, this is concise and rich, authoritative and thought-provoking, an expression of mature, constructive evangelical thought, informed by the academy but in the service of faith and of God. Sometimes he writes in a slightly evasive way (or do I just mean 'careful'?) and uses present participles as subjects, which tends to avoid the subject of the subject, as it were (see the first quote, below, for a classic example), but the quality is there nonetheless.
1. A HERMENEUTIC FOR THE KINGDOM OF GOD
"Mission is a sending from the one human person Jesus Christ into all the world as his witnesses" (10)
On the way from the particular [action of God in Jesus Christ] to the universal [coming of God's kingdom, the achievement of God's good purposes in the whole creation] mission takes place.
This is a canonical and narrative hermeneutic.
"God identifies himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, etc. in order to be the God of all people" (13)
* Movement in time (remembr the past and build the future -- Parable of the Seed, Mark 4:26)
* Movement in space (Parable of the Mustard Seed, Mark 4:30)
* Movement from person to person (the miraculous catch of fish, John 21 cf. Luke 5:1, seven ['complete'] disciples catch 153 ['all'] kinds of fish by Jesus' intervention)
In the hyperbole of New Testament eschatology it had almost been achieved already in time (parousia is very imminent), in place (Romans 1:8) and in number (Colossians 1:23). BUT the story is left open (Matt 28, Acts 28) and Revelation 7 pictures something that has not yet happened, so the church is always in the midst of the story.
2. FROM THE ONE TO THE MANY
Remarkably, Abram is singled out (not as the sole survivor, like Noah) but as the conduit for blessing others.
Genesis 12 has only a few echoes in the rest of the Old Testament -- Psalm 72:17; Isaiah 19; Isaiah 24:25; Jeremiah 4:1-2; Zechariah 8:13.
Blessing comes when curse is overcome (the classic binary as in Deuteronomy 7), which is what Galatians 3:13-14 proclaims as done.
3. GEOGRAPHY -- SACRED AND SYMBOLIC
We all live in specific places.
The Table of Nations in Genesis 11 has seventy, i.e. representative, peoples.
Contra premoden European and classical Chinese thinking, for the OT, people who live on the far edges of the world are not fantastical subjects of travellers' tales (62), weird, tall, ancient, funy eaters, etc. They "are simply ordinary people who, as it happens, live very far from the centre of the world".
Jerusalem is the symbolic centre of the world (Ezekiel 5:5) but near/distant peoples are neither vilified nor idealised. Compare Herodotus on the Persians! (66-67)
The particularity of Jerusalem is replaced by Jesus himself: I, when I am lifted up... will draw all people (John 12:32, and see also John 4:21-23, in which he addresses the Samaritan woman's sacred geography first with with a "Jerusalem" and then with "a time is coming...")
1 Peter and Hebrews then emphasize how Christians are a diaspora people.
4. WITHESS TO THE TRUTH IN A POSTMODERN AND GLOBALIZED WORLD
Romans 10:12-15 tells us that the salvation comes in a way that binds us together (person to person) not just to each, direct from above, like a shaft of light through a roof (quoting Newbigin). Remember, Jesus is the one elected to bring blessing to all.
But postmodernism is suspicious of all such metanarratives, some even blaming Christianity as the root of modernist, Marxist, capitalist, etc oppressive metanarratives.
But the biblical story is a non-modern metanarrative: not about human autonomy, progress, comprehensive understanding or independent mastery. "History... becomes comprehensible only in so far as God reveals his purposes and fulfils them" (91) and so we must maintain "openness to the incalculable ways of God in history" (92)
[This is a nice reminder to give up hubristic and misguided quests, personal or societal, for complete understanding or mastery. BUT a weakness of this being such a brief book comes out -- true though the above might be, this way of framing it and then pulling up short on detail doesn't give any guidance on trades unions, ethnic conflict, corruption in Ethiopia, the UK Parliament, etc...]
The Bible's many narratives -- including multiple angles on the same story/stories -- refuse closure or simple summary. The apparently unassimilable parts have a lesson for all of us, especially systematicians: "the particular has its own integrity and should not be suppressed for the sake of an all too readily comprehensible universal" (93).
Given the fact of globalization, relativism has nothing to say, no resistance to offer. It is all "too easily assimilated to economic pragmatism" (97) [and although Baukham is talking at a high level, this danger is true right down to the individual level -- a friend of mine was just forced to give up the love of his life by his parents and extended family because of economic pragmatism, coupled with snobbery with Chinese characteristics... a romantic tragedy repeated countless times the world over].
Diversity is not necessarily better than truth. BUT "coercion contradicts the nature of truth. It opens the door to the distortion of truth into a vehicle of the will to power" (99). Our truth is conveyed through witness in life and death, how we prove we are not self-serving, but Christ-serving.
[Can't say enough amens to that! Tragically the will to use force in cases of difference, and the recourse to coercion of those with whom there is disagreement, are near-universal, and openly endorsed by non-Christian ideological systems such as Islam, so-called Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, the New Left wokeism sweeping the West, etc.]
RB elaborates a bit on the nature of Christian witness: telling and re-telling Jesus' stories in the face of oppression and being like him in word and deed. Which reminds us of the truth as we go along.
It is only witness to the cross that can undo cynicism, especially of the type that sees all human relations, even the most apparently atruistic, as driven by the will to power.
Conformity to the cross as the church is vital -- the content of the message and the way of delivering it. Including the claim to universal rule. [Babylon, Persia, Rome, Mecca, Wall Street, Beijing et al also claim a universal rule, universal in depth as well as scope, penetrating your very thoughts to demand conformity. To which the gospel says no! Especially to the claim that there is no alternative. Witness against the beast, even unto death, proves that idolatrous claim to be wrong, whoever it is who is making it today.]