What do you think?
Rate this book
Facing Blackness: Media and Minstrelsy in Spike Lee's Bamboozled
"Essential reading for anyone interested in black film, black history, or America's dark past." Kaleem Aftab
Film critic Ashley Clark makes the case for Bamboozled as one of Spike Lee's most rich and enduring films, and as one of the most important satires of American culture in this young century."
Film critic Ashley Clark makes the case for Bamboozled as one of Spike Lee's most rich and enduring films, and as one of the most important satires of American culture in this young century."
- GenresFilmNonfiction
110 pages, Kindle Edition
First published October 20, 2015
3 people are currently reading
54 people want to read
About the author
Ashley Clark
1 bookLibrarian Note: There is more than one author in the Goodreads database with this name.
Ashley Clark is a journalist and film programmer from London, based in Jersey City, USA. He has written for Sight & Sound, Film Comment, The Guardian, Cineaste, Little White Lies, Reverse Shot, Vice, Moving Image Source, Time Out, Indiewire, and The Village Voice, and has appeared as a recurring guest critic on BBC One's Film show. He has curated film series at venues including BAMcinématek, BFI Southbank, and Clapham Picturehouse. Facing Blackness: Media and Minstrelsy in Spike Lee's Bamboozled is his first book.
Ashley Clark is a journalist and film programmer from London, based in Jersey City, USA. He has written for Sight & Sound, Film Comment, The Guardian, Cineaste, Little White Lies, Reverse Shot, Vice, Moving Image Source, Time Out, Indiewire, and The Village Voice, and has appeared as a recurring guest critic on BBC One's Film show. He has curated film series at venues including BAMcinématek, BFI Southbank, and Clapham Picturehouse. Facing Blackness: Media and Minstrelsy in Spike Lee's Bamboozled is his first book.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews
Read
October 12, 2025had the absolute pleasure of getting to speak with ashley clark and have my copy signed after film forum’s recent screening of bamboozled … unfortunately got so nervous that i totally put my foot in my mouth and didn’t even think to mention how much i appreciate his hand in the criterion release of one of my favorite movies from middle school to this day (dee rees’s pariah) and instead could only get out something silly about spike lee’s choice to shoot on digital …. oh well !!!! the movie is fascinating and horrifying and funny and angry and the book is an insightful and excellent companion
December 2, 2022
One of the best film books ever written and about one of the best films every made. Essential in every way.
March 17, 2024
“Lee understands that the convulsion of unexpected laughter is indivisible from the pain and shame of the whole spectacle. It’s one of Bamboozled’s most profound truths.”
February 19, 2024
Have had this one sitting around for a little bit so I thought it would be good to finally get around to it. Little shorty we picked up after a screening of Bamboozled on the auspicious occasion of its 23rd anniversary - coincidentally, exactly one year before I'm sitting here writing this. Scary!!!
Bamboozled is definitely a movie that I've got... complicated feelings about. On my first watch, I was completely floored by it, a movie that felt full of righteous venom that shocked me to my very core. In 2019 I'd done SOME work to try and understand the historical horrors done to Black people by the United States, but this movie shows you so much so directly, putting it in your face so you can't look away, reminding you that all this hate is built into the country's DNA and showing you just how pervasive it is in our representations of Blackness in media. On my second watch, though, the movie felt more... scattered. Where before it had seemed like truth coming out of its well to shame mankind, this time it felt a little more (to paraphrase this book) like Lee was just walking down the street, whirling his fists around, hitting everyone and everything on all sides. With that initial shock of that first viewing gone, it was easier to notice how confused the treatment of, say, the Mau Maus was, a militant rap group portrayed as a bunch of buffoons. Or the treatment of Sloane, much of her scenes apparently making it onto the cutting room floor and leaving her feeling like a pawn in two men's games of sex and jealousy. Same too the ending, which now seemed too tame in its implications of media holding up these kinds of minstrel stereotypes and performances.
I'd hoped the book (that's right! There's a book we're talking about here! I'm not just reviewing movies on a book website!) would help me square some of this up, or at least give me a greater context for where some of this might have been coming from on Lee's part. Ashley Clark gave a talk at the screening we were at and it's clear that he's been thinking about this movie in great depth since he first saw it at age 15 back in 2000. Indeed one might say he's one of the, if not THE, foremost scholar on the work, and one of its greatest advocates, pushing for a critical reappraisal of a movie that polarized audiences on release and led to a rather disheartening box office pull. And it's no surprise that Clark's name is all over the Criterion release of this film, including conversations with Lee and a new essay on the movie as well. I think it was him who'd pushed for its inclusion.
Clark's read on Bamboozled is that it's only become more relevant over time, especially as conversations about media portrayal of Blackness have only grown more foregrounded in the American consciousness. While previous films like Do The Right Thing may have explored the psyche of the neighborhood's residents and directly question their racism, Bamboozled seems to return to the source, saying "so why do these characters feel this way? What causes them to have this terrible view of Black Americans?" before pointing right to the TV screen. Well, not just the TV of course, but the history of how it all got here. The movie may be too unfocused to have the depth of something like Marlon Riggs' excellent Ethnic Notions or even Roger Ross Williams' more recent Stamped from the Beginning for talking about where THAT came from, but this book helped me focus back to the fact that Bamboozled isn't trying to be that - it's trying to be a cry of anger, Howard Beale screaming "I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE," which even gets quoted semi-directly in the movie.
The book also reminded me that at the point the movie came out, Spike Lee had been in Hollywood for over a decade, and had been making provocative works since his undergrad class, when he made a student film about a man who attempts to remake Birth of a Nation that caused a bit of controversy. Looking at it with that in mind, I suppose it was only a matter of time before he returned to the concept, only now armed with the anger and frustration that comes from years and years of trying to be a Black creative in Hollywood - for a lot of people, he might as well have been the only Black director, resulting in him receiving a lot more scrutiny than if the industry had been more integrated. At the time he'd already had projects pitched that wouldn't get picked up by studio executives, movies that in order to complete, he'd had to finish the funding from his own pocket or give up his pay. A project as acerbic as Bamboozled feels like it can only come out of someone who's had the experience, which he definitely did.
As for that feeling of being spread a little too wide in its satirical targets, specifically with how to read the Mau Maus, Clark also comes up with mostly questions than answers, a "perhaps we should see them as people who are so bamboozled they don't know what's right anymore," or perhaps we can take it Lee's perhaps too-late shot at the gangsta rap groups who'd made such success in the preceding decade. Lee had been in the press before calling them "neo-minstrels" already, so perhaps this broadly-sketched group just represent the cartoonishness he thought they exhibited in real life.
The book also places it in the conversation with other works, oft satirical or fantastical, about race by Black creatives, from films like Hollywood Shuffle or the previous Lee-produced Drop Squad, to books like Black No More or, of course, Ralph Ellison's seminal Invisible Man. There's also a greater contextualization of Lee's own work and how it fits into that, as well as his criticism of contemporary portrayals of Blackness in works like The Green Mile or Legend of Bagger Vance.
With all of this in mind, the book helped me come away with a greater understanding of where the movie rose from, both culturally and from Lee himself. Bamboozled is still often a tough watch - in its attempts to mock these stereotypes, it still puts them up on the screen quite faithfully, in all its ugly ol' glory. There's a reminder through it that perhaps we would have truly been able to leave these things in the past, but there's always an audience for it, and there's always BEEN an audience for it. Is it not us, after all, who go to these movies, buy these books, listen to this music, empower the people who allow these creative decisions? If Bamboozled is doing anything, it's putting our nose in it and making us smell it so we know how bad it is. But I think Clark's estimation of it might be right on: a tremendous if messy film, something that needed to happen even if it's difficult to stomach as it flickers on the screen before you. And I'm glad to have had this book to help pick it apart.
Side note I would be curious to hear the author's thoughts on American Fiction (based on the novel Erasure) which is lapping up awards this year. It feels like an edges-sanded-down version of this same concept, a version far less acerbic and far more interested in mocking white liberals - something this book did well to point out were not the whole of the audience being mocked, an audience that includes other Black people and, to my chagrin, Puerto Ricans, for example. Personally I think the fact that it's receiving so much awards-season heat is kind of a mark that it's not as sharp or critical as it so smugly thinks it is and is exactly the kind of softball "see, we can laugh at ourselves and take criticism!" thing that doesn't really have much challenge to it. The movie version, at least, I have not read the book. But that's outside the scope of this review. Toodles!
Bamboozled is definitely a movie that I've got... complicated feelings about. On my first watch, I was completely floored by it, a movie that felt full of righteous venom that shocked me to my very core. In 2019 I'd done SOME work to try and understand the historical horrors done to Black people by the United States, but this movie shows you so much so directly, putting it in your face so you can't look away, reminding you that all this hate is built into the country's DNA and showing you just how pervasive it is in our representations of Blackness in media. On my second watch, though, the movie felt more... scattered. Where before it had seemed like truth coming out of its well to shame mankind, this time it felt a little more (to paraphrase this book) like Lee was just walking down the street, whirling his fists around, hitting everyone and everything on all sides. With that initial shock of that first viewing gone, it was easier to notice how confused the treatment of, say, the Mau Maus was, a militant rap group portrayed as a bunch of buffoons. Or the treatment of Sloane, much of her scenes apparently making it onto the cutting room floor and leaving her feeling like a pawn in two men's games of sex and jealousy. Same too the ending, which now seemed too tame in its implications of media holding up these kinds of minstrel stereotypes and performances.
I'd hoped the book (that's right! There's a book we're talking about here! I'm not just reviewing movies on a book website!) would help me square some of this up, or at least give me a greater context for where some of this might have been coming from on Lee's part. Ashley Clark gave a talk at the screening we were at and it's clear that he's been thinking about this movie in great depth since he first saw it at age 15 back in 2000. Indeed one might say he's one of the, if not THE, foremost scholar on the work, and one of its greatest advocates, pushing for a critical reappraisal of a movie that polarized audiences on release and led to a rather disheartening box office pull. And it's no surprise that Clark's name is all over the Criterion release of this film, including conversations with Lee and a new essay on the movie as well. I think it was him who'd pushed for its inclusion.
Clark's read on Bamboozled is that it's only become more relevant over time, especially as conversations about media portrayal of Blackness have only grown more foregrounded in the American consciousness. While previous films like Do The Right Thing may have explored the psyche of the neighborhood's residents and directly question their racism, Bamboozled seems to return to the source, saying "so why do these characters feel this way? What causes them to have this terrible view of Black Americans?" before pointing right to the TV screen. Well, not just the TV of course, but the history of how it all got here. The movie may be too unfocused to have the depth of something like Marlon Riggs' excellent Ethnic Notions or even Roger Ross Williams' more recent Stamped from the Beginning for talking about where THAT came from, but this book helped me focus back to the fact that Bamboozled isn't trying to be that - it's trying to be a cry of anger, Howard Beale screaming "I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE," which even gets quoted semi-directly in the movie.
The book also reminded me that at the point the movie came out, Spike Lee had been in Hollywood for over a decade, and had been making provocative works since his undergrad class, when he made a student film about a man who attempts to remake Birth of a Nation that caused a bit of controversy. Looking at it with that in mind, I suppose it was only a matter of time before he returned to the concept, only now armed with the anger and frustration that comes from years and years of trying to be a Black creative in Hollywood - for a lot of people, he might as well have been the only Black director, resulting in him receiving a lot more scrutiny than if the industry had been more integrated. At the time he'd already had projects pitched that wouldn't get picked up by studio executives, movies that in order to complete, he'd had to finish the funding from his own pocket or give up his pay. A project as acerbic as Bamboozled feels like it can only come out of someone who's had the experience, which he definitely did.
As for that feeling of being spread a little too wide in its satirical targets, specifically with how to read the Mau Maus, Clark also comes up with mostly questions than answers, a "perhaps we should see them as people who are so bamboozled they don't know what's right anymore," or perhaps we can take it Lee's perhaps too-late shot at the gangsta rap groups who'd made such success in the preceding decade. Lee had been in the press before calling them "neo-minstrels" already, so perhaps this broadly-sketched group just represent the cartoonishness he thought they exhibited in real life.
The book also places it in the conversation with other works, oft satirical or fantastical, about race by Black creatives, from films like Hollywood Shuffle or the previous Lee-produced Drop Squad, to books like Black No More or, of course, Ralph Ellison's seminal Invisible Man. There's also a greater contextualization of Lee's own work and how it fits into that, as well as his criticism of contemporary portrayals of Blackness in works like The Green Mile or Legend of Bagger Vance.
With all of this in mind, the book helped me come away with a greater understanding of where the movie rose from, both culturally and from Lee himself. Bamboozled is still often a tough watch - in its attempts to mock these stereotypes, it still puts them up on the screen quite faithfully, in all its ugly ol' glory. There's a reminder through it that perhaps we would have truly been able to leave these things in the past, but there's always an audience for it, and there's always BEEN an audience for it. Is it not us, after all, who go to these movies, buy these books, listen to this music, empower the people who allow these creative decisions? If Bamboozled is doing anything, it's putting our nose in it and making us smell it so we know how bad it is. But I think Clark's estimation of it might be right on: a tremendous if messy film, something that needed to happen even if it's difficult to stomach as it flickers on the screen before you. And I'm glad to have had this book to help pick it apart.
Side note I would be curious to hear the author's thoughts on American Fiction (based on the novel Erasure) which is lapping up awards this year. It feels like an edges-sanded-down version of this same concept, a version far less acerbic and far more interested in mocking white liberals - something this book did well to point out were not the whole of the audience being mocked, an audience that includes other Black people and, to my chagrin, Puerto Ricans, for example. Personally I think the fact that it's receiving so much awards-season heat is kind of a mark that it's not as sharp or critical as it so smugly thinks it is and is exactly the kind of softball "see, we can laugh at ourselves and take criticism!" thing that doesn't really have much challenge to it. The movie version, at least, I have not read the book. But that's outside the scope of this review. Toodles!
April 20, 2017
I read this to gain further insight on Spike Lee's film "Bamboozled" and got a lot out of it (primarily more things to read and films to watch). There's a lot to unpack in "Bamboozled" and Clark parses it out well. I'm not necessarily a Spike Lee fan, though I've seen some of his films. Clark's analysis has encouraged me to explore more of Spike Lee's films with a clearer understanding of what he aims to do as a director.
Good, quick read.
Good, quick read.
June 10, 2023
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️½
Facing Blackness is one of the best pieces of film writing I've ever read. Ashley Clark's style is efficient, incisive, and insightful and I couldn't stop reading her work. It was like Pauline Kael without the nebulous, navelgazing culdesacs that Kael tends to write herself into (that isn't shade on Kael, that's part of why I love Kael). Originally published in 2015, my only real complaint the 2022 revised edition I read over the past three days is that Clark was unable to add a little more than anew foreword. A whole chapter/section would have been more than justified in this extended essay.
This is a specialty text for sure. You have to be familiar with Spike Lee, race studies, and, of course, Bamboozled, in order to get something out of this. But for those that are interested in those topics, this is a streets ahead piece of prose. It is my sincere hope that Clark will one day write a definitive and comprehensive study on the entirety of Lee's filmography. Or frankly, any director or film topic that she wants to explore.
Facing Blackness is one of the best pieces of film writing I've ever read. Ashley Clark's style is efficient, incisive, and insightful and I couldn't stop reading her work. It was like Pauline Kael without the nebulous, navelgazing culdesacs that Kael tends to write herself into (that isn't shade on Kael, that's part of why I love Kael). Originally published in 2015, my only real complaint the 2022 revised edition I read over the past three days is that Clark was unable to add a little more than anew foreword. A whole chapter/section would have been more than justified in this extended essay.
This is a specialty text for sure. You have to be familiar with Spike Lee, race studies, and, of course, Bamboozled, in order to get something out of this. But for those that are interested in those topics, this is a streets ahead piece of prose. It is my sincere hope that Clark will one day write a definitive and comprehensive study on the entirety of Lee's filmography. Or frankly, any director or film topic that she wants to explore.
Read
July 14, 2023great film writing from Clark, incredibly attentive to the varied exploration of race in Lee’s Bamboozled. It’s a film that can be hard to watch and alluring at the same time, feels like it’s being programmed right into your brain. So it’s helpful to have this book pause and examine all the details from the film.
October 16, 2019
Slim volume that unpacks a lot in a truly confounding film.
February 16, 2021
If Bamboozled strikes you as too prickly to get into, Clark will persuade you that you must persevere. If it proves hard to bear, he will remind you that this is right.
May 19, 2016
As a film critic, but first and by far enthusiast (see: ribald fan), Spike Lee's BAMBOOZLED remains on my Top 5 list of all time. Yes, for real. Its exploration into race and history is beyond powerful. Unlike many, the imagery itself of the New Millennium Minstrel Show didn't shock me as I'd been studying such racist iconography since I was a teenager (I was a different type of teen) - it was the audience's taking to it, much like in the deservedly compared film (intentionally) "Network." What Clark has done with "Facing Blackness" is delve into BAMBOOZLED like no simple essay can. His exploration into the reaction to the film, its lack of success (among my circles it was a success, so I was pretty shocked it didn't make back its money), and the meanings behind many of the rich characters from the film, is illuminating. Yet, it is Clarke's use of language and humor (some of it wryly British - in a good way!) to delve into his subject matter that made "Facing Blackness" truly succeed. Ignore how long it took me to read as I get distracted easily. This book is thorough and engaging and a must read for any film and history buff.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews