What do you think?
Rate this book
New Sudden Fiction: Short-Short Stories from America and Beyond
An all-new volume―students and lovers of literature take note: this is serious writing that's fun to read. Responding to America’s love affair with the short-short, editors Robert Shapard and James Thomas searched thousands of books and magazines to select these sixty stories―each under 2,000 words, each with its own element of surprise, whether traditional, experimental, humorous, moving, or magical. In the process they discovered both new talents and a wealth of celebrated writers, such as Jorge Luis Arzola, Aimee Bender, Teolinda Gersao, Romulus Linney, Yann Martel, Sam Shepard, and Tobias Wolff. Zdravka Evitmova conjures blood drops that cure any disease. Ian Frazier writes public relations for crows. Juan José Milás leads an amnesiac husband to an affair in the candlelit darkness of a cathedral with his wife. These tales told quickly offer pleasures long past their telling.
368 pages, Paperback
First published January 22, 2007
46 people are currently reading
485 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 60 reviews
September 20, 2009
Sudden Fiction = Short-Short Stories. With authors like David Foster Wallace, Chuck Palahniuk, Joyce Carol Oates, Elizabeth Berg, and Yann Martel how can you go wrong? Well, you really can't.* Most all of these stories were pretty fantastic. I keep going back to several, most notably Robin Hemley's "Reply All," which is told in the email format... I know I've hit "reply all" with disastrous results before... This collection is pretty much all gold. And if you come across a story you don't like, it's guaranteed to be under 2000 words. Score.
*Here's how you can go wrong: getting this book for a class of 7th graders. It's catalogued under "Y" in our library. I'm guessing Y=young adult between 18-25 instead of 13-18... As I'm sure you've gathered from the list of authors at the top, many of these have adult themes. Great stories, fun to read, but not what I was looking for to push on my class.
(And to think I got a little bent out of shape over Neil Gaiman's M is for Magic.
*Here's how you can go wrong: getting this book for a class of 7th graders. It's catalogued under "Y" in our library. I'm guessing Y=young adult between 18-25 instead of 13-18... As I'm sure you've gathered from the list of authors at the top, many of these have adult themes. Great stories, fun to read, but not what I was looking for to push on my class.
(And to think I got a little bent out of shape over Neil Gaiman's M is for Magic.
Want to read
February 4, 2026Sobre el primer relato de este libro (Las flores, Alice Walker):
La inocencia de los niños es algo invaluable que en ocasiones se subestima. No sé en que momento empezamos a ver las cosas con malicia. En realidad tiene mucho sentido, de niños no conocemos mucho del mundo y (lo poco que conocemos) es podría decirse "bueno". Luego, conforme vamos creciendo y viendo al mundo como en realidad es, nuestra perspectiva cambia y con ello nuestra manera de vivir.
¿Podría ser el relato el punto clave en que la protagonista empieza a ver el mundo con otros ojos? Tal vez no lo note ahora, tal vez se de cuenta en unos años, pero hay un cambio: el mundo ya no es solo flores y ramitas secas. Encontramos en nuestro campo feliz, un agente desconocido.
La inocencia es un regalo que no pedimos y que se nos es arrebatado sin aviso. Tampoco tenemos la conciencia suficiente para valorarla como es debido, pero parte de crecer es perderla.
La inocencia de los niños es algo invaluable que en ocasiones se subestima. No sé en que momento empezamos a ver las cosas con malicia. En realidad tiene mucho sentido, de niños no conocemos mucho del mundo y (lo poco que conocemos) es podría decirse "bueno". Luego, conforme vamos creciendo y viendo al mundo como en realidad es, nuestra perspectiva cambia y con ello nuestra manera de vivir.
¿Podría ser el relato el punto clave en que la protagonista empieza a ver el mundo con otros ojos? Tal vez no lo note ahora, tal vez se de cuenta en unos años, pero hay un cambio: el mundo ya no es solo flores y ramitas secas. Encontramos en nuestro campo feliz, un agente desconocido.
La inocencia es un regalo que no pedimos y que se nos es arrebatado sin aviso. Tampoco tenemos la conciencia suficiente para valorarla como es debido, pero parte de crecer es perderla.
July 7, 2008
The original Sudden Fiction anthology was something of a literary groundbreaker as well as the start of a franchise--Robert Shapard and James Thomas could be credited with giving sudden (aka flash, aka micro, aka short short) fiction a formal stage so that the genre could (and did) become acceptable in all kinds of venues where it had not been considered legitimate before. Obviously, Raymond Carver's seminal collection What We Talk About When We Talk About Love (the one edited by Gordon Lish, who of course wanted to take full credit for the form in the first Sudden Fiction anthology) may have been among the first collections to qualify the boundaries of short fiction into the realm of a page or two, but Shapard & Thomas' first Sudden Fiction anthology was possibly the first popular proof that this short form was just as competent as the longer short story form and could be tackled by writers just as competent as Carver.
From there, Shapard & Thomas sparked the Sudden Fiction anthology series and even did spots of the Flash Fiction anthology series, together or separately. This volume is the most recent installment, and it follows the method of the others--stories that tend to fall in the range of 2,000 words or lower, and familiar names (Tobias Wolff, Sam Shephard, Joyce Carol Oates, etc.) standing next to names that are not as familiar, due either to neglect in the whorls of the literary administration or to the general low quality of their work.
Of course, any anthology is going to have its hits and misses, and this one is no exception. Aimee Bender is a nice turn in the road, since all the stories before hers seem to have a definite realist tendency, and hers is the first to explore the realm of the surreal, and does so quite powerfully. Ha Jin's piece about humor and those political machines that have none is about as powerful as any Mo Yan novel, and Chuck Palahniuk is as verbose as ever, though the shorter form lets his piece resonate nicely without being swept away by its language. Sherrie Flick's "How I Left Ned" is wonderfully creepy and gothic, a story that could only be sustained in an abbreviated form, and Geoffrey Forsyth's "Mud" is an incredible musing on grief. Stacey Richter's "The Minimalist" is a spin through the world of an artistic and personal meltdown. These works show the power of the sudden fiction format--the emotions are intense, bombastic and ride prominently on the sleeve. They aren't poetic, and so don't seem appropriate to call prose poems, but instead have that kind of grounded punch that good fiction has, with events that might not be familiar but are certainly sympathetic.
Some of the misses, though, really dragged down this collection, as they showed the weaknesses this genre can exude. Toure's "I Shot the Sherriff" is a pretty redundant piece that takes a lot of obvious moves and shows a pretty weak writing hand (despite the author's arrogant bio at the back of the book). Robert Olen Butler's "Seven Pieces of Severance" is just a poor smattering of pieces from his collection Severance--cryptic monologues from decapitated heads. Elizabeth Berg's "The Party" is a rather typical musing on the differences between men and women--rather one-sided and cliché by the end. These are the pieces that serve as reminders that the term Sudden Fiction can sometimes be used to try to legitimize failed short stories--many of these pieces provide little of the kind of interest that sustains good short fiction, no matter how long: a vivid glimpse into genuine human character.
The failings of this collection are a little less forgivable than they would be in previous anthologies only because Shapard & Thomas have helped define and justify this genre, so it would seem that their positions would entail and effort to further define the genre's boundaries and possibilities. While there are quite a few pieces here that show a maturation of the sudden fiction genre, it is clear that the term is also being used to try to give credence to short-minded, poorly imaginative work. Perhaps that is just the nature of the literary game, but I would have rather finished this collection with a twitter of excitement and possibility rather than a pang of some missed opportunity.
From there, Shapard & Thomas sparked the Sudden Fiction anthology series and even did spots of the Flash Fiction anthology series, together or separately. This volume is the most recent installment, and it follows the method of the others--stories that tend to fall in the range of 2,000 words or lower, and familiar names (Tobias Wolff, Sam Shephard, Joyce Carol Oates, etc.) standing next to names that are not as familiar, due either to neglect in the whorls of the literary administration or to the general low quality of their work.
Of course, any anthology is going to have its hits and misses, and this one is no exception. Aimee Bender is a nice turn in the road, since all the stories before hers seem to have a definite realist tendency, and hers is the first to explore the realm of the surreal, and does so quite powerfully. Ha Jin's piece about humor and those political machines that have none is about as powerful as any Mo Yan novel, and Chuck Palahniuk is as verbose as ever, though the shorter form lets his piece resonate nicely without being swept away by its language. Sherrie Flick's "How I Left Ned" is wonderfully creepy and gothic, a story that could only be sustained in an abbreviated form, and Geoffrey Forsyth's "Mud" is an incredible musing on grief. Stacey Richter's "The Minimalist" is a spin through the world of an artistic and personal meltdown. These works show the power of the sudden fiction format--the emotions are intense, bombastic and ride prominently on the sleeve. They aren't poetic, and so don't seem appropriate to call prose poems, but instead have that kind of grounded punch that good fiction has, with events that might not be familiar but are certainly sympathetic.
Some of the misses, though, really dragged down this collection, as they showed the weaknesses this genre can exude. Toure's "I Shot the Sherriff" is a pretty redundant piece that takes a lot of obvious moves and shows a pretty weak writing hand (despite the author's arrogant bio at the back of the book). Robert Olen Butler's "Seven Pieces of Severance" is just a poor smattering of pieces from his collection Severance--cryptic monologues from decapitated heads. Elizabeth Berg's "The Party" is a rather typical musing on the differences between men and women--rather one-sided and cliché by the end. These are the pieces that serve as reminders that the term Sudden Fiction can sometimes be used to try to legitimize failed short stories--many of these pieces provide little of the kind of interest that sustains good short fiction, no matter how long: a vivid glimpse into genuine human character.
The failings of this collection are a little less forgivable than they would be in previous anthologies only because Shapard & Thomas have helped define and justify this genre, so it would seem that their positions would entail and effort to further define the genre's boundaries and possibilities. While there are quite a few pieces here that show a maturation of the sudden fiction genre, it is clear that the term is also being used to try to give credence to short-minded, poorly imaginative work. Perhaps that is just the nature of the literary game, but I would have rather finished this collection with a twitter of excitement and possibility rather than a pang of some missed opportunity.
October 9, 2012
A book of 'short-short stories,' which the editor defines as stories under 2,000 words. The central question here is whether or not this is a genre. Some of the stories seem artificially compressed, as if their authors had to telegraph their thoughts to fit the word limit. Others, among the most successful, read like excerpts from longer stories or fragments of novels. (Joyce Carol Oates's is an example.) Quite a few use surrealist juxtaposition as a principal reductive strategy. Others are attempts at parables or allegories, but they tend to be awkward, ill-conceived, or randomly associative, or campy. Very few seem to be fully realized and optimal at their present length. So the collection is strained, and even aside from questions of quality, the 'short-short story' does not work as a new kind of fiction. Unless fourth-generation North American surrealism or belated revivals of absurdism are sufficient organizational strategies, and unless aphorisms, epigrams, and prose poems are allowed into the category of 'short-short stores,' then almost none of these work as independent forms.[return][return]And then there's the question of quality. Very few are good. Among the best: contributions by Peter Orner, Sam Shepard, Oates, Frederick Adolf Paola, Larissa Amir, Elizabeth Berg, Hon McNally, David Foster Wallace, and Donald Frame. Most of the rest are artificially compressed, arcane, pointlessly or aimlessly whimsical, raw and indigestible, or just trite.
April 20, 2021
⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
Critical Score: B-
Personal Score: C+
Reading Experience: 📚
I almost regret picking this up, because it took so long to get through and there weren’t that many standouts. Most stories are basic, underwhelming, often confusing, boomer-y rambles about white married couple issues. There are some great pieces nestled in. There are a few outright duds.
I found myself reading this quickly these past few days. I wish I’d had a reading experience like that from the get go.
Not sure what I expected from a 2007 collection of elitist American lit mag stories.
Could have been way worse, though! There were moments where I was comfortably entertained, so I don’t want to make this review sound too harsh.
Critical Score: B-
Personal Score: C+
Reading Experience: 📚
I almost regret picking this up, because it took so long to get through and there weren’t that many standouts. Most stories are basic, underwhelming, often confusing, boomer-y rambles about white married couple issues. There are some great pieces nestled in. There are a few outright duds.
I found myself reading this quickly these past few days. I wish I’d had a reading experience like that from the get go.
Not sure what I expected from a 2007 collection of elitist American lit mag stories.
Could have been way worse, though! There were moments where I was comfortably entertained, so I don’t want to make this review sound too harsh.
February 7, 2016
"Don't smile. Just because I'm smiling, don't assume I couldn't kill you right now."
This was a book of a ton of short short stories. It is amazing that a complete story can be told in such a small number of words. We really do need less than we think to get our point across.
My favorite stories from the collection are:
A History of Everything, Including You
Loving the Dead
Tomorrow's Bird
Blood
Pompeii
In Reference to Your Recent Communications
Consumed
Why Men Quit: An Intellectual Inquiry
Swimming for Shore
Feelers
The Gold Lunch
This was a book of a ton of short short stories. It is amazing that a complete story can be told in such a small number of words. We really do need less than we think to get our point across.
My favorite stories from the collection are:
A History of Everything, Including You
Loving the Dead
Tomorrow's Bird
Blood
Pompeii
In Reference to Your Recent Communications
Consumed
Why Men Quit: An Intellectual Inquiry
Swimming for Shore
Feelers
The Gold Lunch
March 27, 2017
Tough to rate this book. As a collection of 60-ish super short stories, it was very hit or miss. But damn, some of them really hit. A great book to kill time since each story is less then 2,000 words. A great mix of comedy, experimental, and dramatic. Worth checking out, especially the first two stories I would say.
February 15, 2021
Fantastic anthology of short shorts. Such a deliciously weird grouping of authors. Deb Olin Unferth's contribution is darkly hilarious. There's a grisly piece by Yann Martel that could have ended up in a horror anthology. Sam Shepard's contribution is a bit of a yawner. Barry Gifford. Gerald Locklin. The editors picked such diverse writers that it really makes the energy crackle and it thwarts any expectations you might know what's coming at you next. Sameness of anything (affect, plotlines, facture) can really ruin an anthology. This collection suffers from no such disease of editorship.
March 31, 2010
If you pick up this collection of very-very short-shorts and you read the first story while you're still in the store, you might buy it. Well, that's because it's the best story in the book. I fell right into that trap.
This volume boasts some big names--Chuck Palahniuk, David Foster Wallace, Joyce Carol Oates, Tobias Wolff, Aimee Bender--and their stories were okay--well, actually theirs were all pretty good but I'd read some of them before--but for the most part i was just... Where are they getting these stories from?!
There is a story, seriously, about a girl who is so obsessed with Chris Cornell that she falls for a homeless man who resembles him, makes him shower, and then lives out her fantasies with him. There is a story where having lunch with your ex is an Olympic sport (it was KIND of clever). There is a story called "Stolen Chocolates" (I'm sorry but that's just too much), and one called "Reply All." These things are not unforgivable but the stories don't make up for them.
The two stories in the anthology I actually liked were the ones translated from Spanish. Suck it.
This volume boasts some big names--Chuck Palahniuk, David Foster Wallace, Joyce Carol Oates, Tobias Wolff, Aimee Bender--and their stories were okay--well, actually theirs were all pretty good but I'd read some of them before--but for the most part i was just... Where are they getting these stories from?!
There is a story, seriously, about a girl who is so obsessed with Chris Cornell that she falls for a homeless man who resembles him, makes him shower, and then lives out her fantasies with him. There is a story where having lunch with your ex is an Olympic sport (it was KIND of clever). There is a story called "Stolen Chocolates" (I'm sorry but that's just too much), and one called "Reply All." These things are not unforgivable but the stories don't make up for them.
The two stories in the anthology I actually liked were the ones translated from Spanish. Suck it.
July 26, 2016
I've enjoyed flash fiction for a long while now, but it has been more than awhile since I've visited the form.
This was an excellent collection to dive back in with, as most every story hit me in some way.
The preface discusses how this length and form just seems to "work," as many shorter stories can feel too incomplete or ambiguous, and longer works can start to get bogged down. However, this length of story packs a hell of a punch, and many of these stories are perfect examples of that punch.
What I liked best, though, is the range of when these were written. I had originally assumed that all were recent stories. However, upon checking out the contributor's notes, I saw how many had copyright dates decades ago. I never would have guessed. These writer's have all done what we should strive to: they touch on something that resonates throughout the years and contexts.
That, to me, makes this more than worth the read, and--even more--makes this collection one to study, if you want to learn the short form.
This was an excellent collection to dive back in with, as most every story hit me in some way.
The preface discusses how this length and form just seems to "work," as many shorter stories can feel too incomplete or ambiguous, and longer works can start to get bogged down. However, this length of story packs a hell of a punch, and many of these stories are perfect examples of that punch.
What I liked best, though, is the range of when these were written. I had originally assumed that all were recent stories. However, upon checking out the contributor's notes, I saw how many had copyright dates decades ago. I never would have guessed. These writer's have all done what we should strive to: they touch on something that resonates throughout the years and contexts.
That, to me, makes this more than worth the read, and--even more--makes this collection one to study, if you want to learn the short form.
November 1, 2008
I'm changing my rating to 5 stars, from 4. My interest in the Sudden Fiction series is mostly to learn how to write short-shorts and I look to the Sudden Fiction series for inspiration, and to see how it's done. And they're also great bedside reading as you can read many full morsels before drifting off.
I wasn't excited with the original, Sudden Fiction, American Short-Short Stories, published in 1986. But I went back through this collection to tag those that evoked something in me, those worth rereading, and the book ended up with many, many sticky notes. So 5 it must be!
I wasn't excited with the original, Sudden Fiction, American Short-Short Stories, published in 1986. But I went back through this collection to tag those that evoked something in me, those worth rereading, and the book ended up with many, many sticky notes. So 5 it must be!
May 25, 2008
This survey of stories three pages or less links a range of writing from humorous to magical, from experimental to traditional, notable authors being Tobias Wolff, Joyce Carol Oates, Robert Olen Butler, Ha Jin, David Foster Wallace and Sam Shepard. Some of these stories succeeded in capturing the essence of a moment to reveal a larger significance, while others just felt like an outline or sketch of something that could be larger and more meaningful.
March 27, 2009
I read this and Children Standing Before a Statue of Hercules at the same time. I'd rate this one at a slightly lower awesomeness-per-page average, but still had many great stories that introduced me to new authors.
Also, the short-short is the perfect length for the typical window I have for pleasure reading each day, in the morning between breakfast and shower, if you know what I'm talking about.
Also, the short-short is the perfect length for the typical window I have for pleasure reading each day, in the morning between breakfast and shower, if you know what I'm talking about.
May 4, 2009
The stories in this book are amazing. They're short, precise, funny, serious, curious, and above all fun. They are direct, starting you off in the action so there's no need for some long intro, and then after you read one story you think, "There's no way this next story will be as good as the last one," but guess what? It is!
March 30, 2008
Some real winners. I guess breaking up is the genesis to the short story.
February 6, 2011
Probably one of the best collections of short stories I've ever read.
May 28, 2011
Some real funny stuff in this one- and some equally as disturbing...
Currently reading
July 14, 2011still reading
January 10, 2013
To tell a good story in so few pages is a true gift. I thoroughly enjoyed most of the stories in this volume. Sudden fiction is a true blue genre, put your seatbelt on.
4.25 Stars.
4.25 Stars.
May 27, 2016
Short fiction is awesome and as a short person, I claim this genre for my people.
December 8, 2018
I've been writing a bit of flash fiction lately, and the Sudden Fiction series is touted as the gold standard of short-short fiction. (Note, however, that their definition of "sudden" is longer than the normal limit of "flash" fiction.)
I bought this entry in the series, because it's the only one the bookstore had on its shelves when I went looking. Bottom line: I'll be rounding up the other entries in the series, starting from the beginning. This is that good.
It contains everything from David Foster Wallace's DON'T EVER READ THIS, IT'S TOO TRAUMATIC piece, which I wish I could unsee, to "Reply All" by Robin Hemley, which brings that bad habit to its just and terrible end. There's an audio tour of an ex's apartment, an annotated breakup message ("In Reference to Your Recent Communications"), and several stories that show both sides of a decision tree.
I loved Jenny Hollowell's "A History of Everything, Including You" which uses a technique I wish I'd thought of, because now it's been closed to all of us.
Other fine studies are Teolinda Gersão's "The Red Fox Fur Coat", Sam Shepard's "Berlin Wall Piece" and Aimee Bender's "The Rememberer". "Swimming for Shore" (Chrissy Kolaya) and "Before the Train, and After" (Katherine Nolte) take on fateful moments and regret.
I'll praise the pieces by Dean Paschal, Steve Amick, Benjamin Alire Sáenz and Ron Carlson as well; though all the pieces (BUT SKIP THE DFW!!!!) are clever, solid, and inspiring.
And did I find myself coming up with new ideas?? Yes, indeed.
Recommended.
I bought this entry in the series, because it's the only one the bookstore had on its shelves when I went looking. Bottom line: I'll be rounding up the other entries in the series, starting from the beginning. This is that good.
It contains everything from David Foster Wallace's DON'T EVER READ THIS, IT'S TOO TRAUMATIC piece, which I wish I could unsee, to "Reply All" by Robin Hemley, which brings that bad habit to its just and terrible end. There's an audio tour of an ex's apartment, an annotated breakup message ("In Reference to Your Recent Communications"), and several stories that show both sides of a decision tree.
I loved Jenny Hollowell's "A History of Everything, Including You" which uses a technique I wish I'd thought of, because now it's been closed to all of us.
Other fine studies are Teolinda Gersão's "The Red Fox Fur Coat", Sam Shepard's "Berlin Wall Piece" and Aimee Bender's "The Rememberer". "Swimming for Shore" (Chrissy Kolaya) and "Before the Train, and After" (Katherine Nolte) take on fateful moments and regret.
I'll praise the pieces by Dean Paschal, Steve Amick, Benjamin Alire Sáenz and Ron Carlson as well; though all the pieces (BUT SKIP THE DFW!!!!) are clever, solid, and inspiring.
And did I find myself coming up with new ideas?? Yes, indeed.
Recommended.
May 14, 2017
Much like Flash Fiction Forward, there are many brilliant entries within this anthology, but there are also those whose mediocre quality prevent me from giving this a perfect score. Amongst my favorites in this is "The History of the Entire Universe Including You," but there plenty of other entries that stand out for their ability to comment upon perception and how it's relationship to reality is not always as it appears at first glance. My other complaint, which is appropriate for Flash Fiction Forward as well, is that it could stand to be more multicultural. There are international entries within this, but issues of intersectional identity seem underrepresented when these two anthologies by the same editors are read in near succession. This doesn't necessarily take away from the volumes, but it is a critique that might otherwise go unnoticed.
February 12, 2026
Lectura alternativa del mes de febrero Club de lectura @clasicoesleerte:
Esto sin duda alguna fue un balde de agua fría, no era algo que esperaba y creo que parte de su mensaje es eso, que se note lo frágil que la niñez y cómo incluso en el momento más terrible pueden no comprenderlo.
Porque siento que pudo ser el inicio de muchas preguntas para la pequeña Myop, quizás se preguntara quién era la persona que vio? o lo verá como un recuerdo raro al crecer?
No lo sabremos
Lo cierto es que se sienten como dos experiencias distintas, la que experimentamos como lector y la que la protagonista está pasando.
Un triste relato sin duda alguna.
Esto sin duda alguna fue un balde de agua fría, no era algo que esperaba y creo que parte de su mensaje es eso, que se note lo frágil que la niñez y cómo incluso en el momento más terrible pueden no comprenderlo.
Porque siento que pudo ser el inicio de muchas preguntas para la pequeña Myop, quizás se preguntara quién era la persona que vio? o lo verá como un recuerdo raro al crecer?
No lo sabremos
Lo cierto es que se sienten como dos experiencias distintas, la que experimentamos como lector y la que la protagonista está pasando.
Un triste relato sin duda alguna.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
April 18, 2018
Some of these stories were fabulous. “Incarnations of Burned Children”, “Powder”, “Water Names”, and “My Kid’s Dog” were my favorites and each of them was different. Others of the stories left me thinking “What? I just spent my time reading that and it was pointless or to obscure or the only thing going for it is the shock value.” It was an interesting book and some of the stories I will pick up and read again and others will whisper in my ear. Still, the majority of these stories did not work for me.
March 26, 2018
This is an entertaining and fun collection. Some of the stories are excellent, some are just all right. A History of Everything, Including You, The Raft, Tomorrow’s Bird, Blood, We Ate the Children Last, My Lawrence, In Reference to Your Recent Communications, Consumed, Mud, Feelers, The Party, My Kid’s Dog, Reply All, Escort, and Doughnut Shops and Doormen were all very good.
November 14, 2018
I bought this book in college for a lit class, which only required us to read one of these short stories, and never got around to reading the rest.
That one short story for the class was my favorite by the end of this collection, but there were a few other jems.
That one short story for the class was my favorite by the end of this collection, but there were a few other jems.
July 19, 2019
Because each of these stories are so condensed, I found myself having to sit with each one after reading. Haunting and exposing in what’s left out. Incredible voice and creativity told through unique storytelling formats. Immensely memorable, a fantastic collection.
February 15, 2025
A wide variety of different and intriguing short stories. Each one unique and fascinating. A really great introduction into short stories for adult readers. Some stories are very heavy, deep, or gross.
January 8, 2017
I have this dining companion who delights in feeding me "the perfect bite".
These stories are perfect bites.
Exciting writing.
Inspiring models for an aspiring author.
Yum.
These stories are perfect bites.
Exciting writing.
Inspiring models for an aspiring author.
Yum.
January 21, 2018
I really enjoyed this book - nice, short pieces that get right to it. Great writing. I read the original, too.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 60 reviews