When not bogged down by the conventions of either the Republican or Democrat party, Donald Trump is able to speak his mind regarding every facet of American politics and reach a broad spectrum of citizens on all sides. Writing as someone considering a run for the Presidency in 2000 – and also as a potential Reform Party candidate – Trump's views from this time align almost perfectly with my own, as they were very Centrist in nature. He was fiscally, economically, and militarily conservative, but socially liberal. He believed in lowering taxes for the majority of Americans and implementing higher taxes for the most wealthy in order to reduce (or, as he believed, eliminate) the national debt. He wanted to build up our military so that it may react properly in the event that troublesome nations such as Iran or North Korea (who are both major players in the world today) acted in a manner that was threatening to our national security. He wanted to secure job opportunities at home rather than ship them overseas in order to benefit low-income areas and marginalized demographics such as the African American and Hispanic communities. A president Trump in 2000 would have looked out for the gay community to ensure that they were treated with respect and equality under the law. Way back in 2000, he was able to prove himself as being a fervent opponent of the many outrageous and horrible things that the media constantly accuses him of supporting now during his 2016 campaign; he denounced, in no uncertain terms, blights such as racism, misogyny, Nazi sympathy (which Pat Buchanan – another Presidential candidate in 2000 – apparently supported for some deluded reason), bigotry, and other un-American ideologies. It would have been interesting to see Donald Trump's impact on America and the world had he fully committed to a run for the Presidency in 2000 and won. Based on his views from that time, I think Donald Trump would have had a legitimate chance at winning were it not for the third-party stigma afflicting this nation – in that nobody sensibly votes beyond the two major parties despite Independent candidates having, oftentimes, better ideas.
Although he is now running as a Republican, and by virtue must endorse certain social policies and beliefs that I dislike, I believe that the Donald Trump from 2000 is still running in 2016, but in a covert manner. I truly think that he still holds many of the same beliefs that he did back in 2000, no matter how contradictory they may seem now that he is the Republican nominee. For example, his show of support for the LGBTQ community after the Orlando terror shootings demonstrates his understanding of their sexuality despite the fact that Republicans oppose gay marriage and their equality under the law. Also, his reluctance to bring up any legislative talk about the LGBTQ community in a negative connotation shows that he doesn't want to embrace every single aspect of the Republican party, instead opting to both support what he truly believes to be righteous while at the same time avoiding any alienation with his core conservative supporters who may not see eye-to-eye with him. I see him balance the Trump of old with this new Trump all the time, and I think it makes him a more versatile politician because of it.
For countless other reasons, which I won't divulge here, I believe that Donald Trump is the best choice for the 2016 Presidency, for I feel that he will be a great leader for this country based on his stances outlined in The America We Deserve as well as in his more recent political book, Crippled America. Almost all of what he believed back in 2000 seems to hold true today, even if the media won't tell you that. I found that The America We Deserve served as a more all-encompassing political book explaining Trump's true political views than his actual 2016 candidacy book, Crippled America, managed to do. This book goes into far greater detail on policy stances than the latter book, and it reads much more smoothly as well (Crippled America felt like a transcript of one of his more extensive off-the-cuff political rallies, while The America We Deserve read like a more polished Trump speech). Although the references and current events may be quite outdated, the substance remains mostly unhindered by time, and much of The America We Deserve serves as a great starting point for anyone wanting to get to know the political side of Donald Trump.
I know it isn't the most popular thing right now to support Donald Trump, but if more people took the time to evaluate him based on his publicly avowed stances on political matters rather than hearsay from the (mostly biased) media, then I think they would see him as being a far more rational and calculated person than he oftentimes appears on the news. In written form, Trump is both intellectual as well as persuasive with his political arguments, whereas the Trump you see at his famous rallies is the showman side of him coming out in full-swing to get people riled up about voting this November. I think it would be unfair to judge him entirely on one aspect of his being without considering the other, so I recommend that you read this book, along with some of his others, if you want to get a better picture of the kind of President he will end up being. Not everyone will agree with him, and that's okay – I certainly do not agree with every single thing he believes in. However, I would advise that you make an attempt to know who it is you're opposing so vehemently before casting your vote in this upcoming election. A lot is on the line this time around, and simply denouncing a candidate because he "sounds mean" may not be the wisest thing to do in the long run.