William Halsey was the most famous naval officer of World War II. His fearlessness in carrier raids against Japan, his steely resolve at Guadalcanal, and his impulsive blunder at the Battle of Leyte Gulf made him the "Patton of the Pacific" and solidified his reputation as a decisive, aggressive fighter prone to impetuous errors of judgment in the heat of battle. In this definitive biography, Thomas Hughes punctures the popular caricature of the "fighting admiral" to reveal the truth of Halsey's personal and professional life as it was lived in times of war and peace.
Halsey, the son of a Navy officer whose alcoholism scuttled a promising career, committed himself wholeheartedly to naval life at an early age. An audacious and inspiring commander to his men, he met the operational challenges of the battle at sea against Japan with dramatically effective carrier strikes early in the war. Yet his greatest contribution to the Allied victory was as commander of the combined sea, air, and land forces in the South Pacific during the long slog up the Solomon Islands chain, one of the war's most daunting battlegrounds. Halsey turned a bruising slugfest with the Japanese navy into a rout. Skillfully mediating the constant strategy disputes between the Army and the Navy--as well as the clashes of ego between General Douglas MacArthur and Admiral Chester Nimitz--Halsey was the linchpin of America's Pacific war effort when its outcome was far from certain.
An excellent book on the life of Admiral Bill Halsey. Halsey was a loud and vociferous man who didn't mind making headlines and threatening the enemy. Although Halsey is well known and was a remarkable commander of the 5th Battle Fleet in the Pacific. He survived a court-martial and being relieved of command primarily because of his name and reputation. However, he still helped guide the U. S. to victory in the Pacific during WW II due to his fighting nature. This is a biography well worth reading. I have rated this as 4* although it probably should be rated at 3.5*.
Hughes biography of Admiral Halsey is a marvelous story of Halsey's life and, in addition, an in depth examination of his character, determination, and exceptional leadership of men at war. It must be added that Hughes pulls no punches; he includes among Halsey's achievements and attributes his failures and shortcomings. He paints a complete picture. All of those elements are written across a wonderfully detailed backdrop of World War II in the Pacific. That war, as detailed by Hughes, was of a magnitude that was unimagined before. The prewar Pacific Fleet had approximately 700 ships. The Pacific Fleet in the war had thousands. The detailed accounts of the sea battles and the island invasions could constitute a book of their own. I would rate this book with Halsey, four stars (plus one...).
A wonderful biography of Halsey, our colorful fighting Admiral of WWII. From his early beginnings in the shadow of his naval father, to eclipsing his father's accomplishments.
Admiral Bill Halsey, A story covering his father's career and quickly moving onto his own career. Did his time with the great white fleet on that pacific wide tour, and shows his character early on. Incidents of worthy merit without hesitation jumping into freezing waters to rescue man overboard, held him in good stead. Then moving to world war 2, he had a outwardly simplistic style of giving orders, but in the cloud of war that was very effective. But even though he had many successes he also had fails, but seems to me he was loved by his men & I'd say from what I've read I agree, anyway a lot of interesting snippets of battles, but read from different angles as the many war books I've read still makes it interesting to myself, especially his dealings with MacArthur & Nimitz always interesting, reading the most written about times ever, from the different perspectives will always keep me being a student of world war 2 & now even more with all its influences in today's world. I liked this book great read.
Careful, disciplined and scrupulous, Thomas Hughes' biography of Halsey will probably please no one as it is a "reasoned" study of the man who probably was America's last "seadog". To Hughes, Halsey is neither Nelson, nor an irresponsible hot head, but a man of his naval time and education fighting a new kind of war on literally a global scale. His mistake at Leyte Gulf and his misunderstanding of the dangers of typhoons are huge blots, but his record as a brave, aggressive commander also explains his ongoing reputation among naval historians.
A good book, providing a balanced portrait of Admiral Bill Halsey and his role in World War II. The author, military historian Thomas Alexander Hughes, delivers a personalized biography of “The Fighting Admiral.” Hughes offers fair assessments of Halsey’s decisions during the war’s more controversial moments, including his actions during the typhoon incidents and the Battle of Leyte Gulf. Hughes takes care to explain Halsey’s mindset and operational perspective, grounding his analysis in the Admiral’s personality and leadership style. While the book leans a bit too hagiographic at times, it succeeds in illustrating how character and temperament are central to understanding a warfighting Admiral. Hughes shows how Halsey used his inherent boldness, charisma, emotional intensity, and deep understanding of Naval culture to shape both his command decisions and his public image. A good book for readers interested in the human dimension of military leadership and the ways in which personality intersects with strategic command. Highly recommended for those studying World War II naval operations and the complexities of high-stakes decision-making.
This tale of the life of Admiral Halsey shows us that ordinary people can rise to accomplish great tasks if given the chance and if they surround themselves with people who will strive with them. According to this biography, Halsey was largely responsible for the success against the Japanese during WWII because he was able to coordinate between MacArthur and Nimitz. His strength was as a battlefield commander, but it was his willingness to suppress his desire for acclaim in service to the goal of beating the Japanese that led to his success and acclaim.
I am reminded of another flawed American leader, Richard Nixon. Nixon did many great things - e.g., opening relations with China, establishing the EPA, but he also did a number of dreadful things - Watergate, HUAC. Can we take the good with the bad? Do we demand perfection from our leaders?
After ‘The Admirals’ by Borneman, I got more interested in the Pacific naval battles and admiral Halsey. Hughes does a good job shattering stereotypes. Interesting tomsee that Bill’s father could not make the adaptation to a changing navy, but Bill could - up to a point: in the end, the changing times did catch up with him, and his personality flaws prevented him from admitting his mistakes inLeyte Gulf and during the two devastating typhoons. The fact that he spent his entire life in the navy makes me think. Focus is one thing, and can be effective. But people are more complex than to be limited to one area of life.
This is the first time I read a biography where person who the biography was about died in the first chapter. Admiral Halsey was a great leader in the Pacific during WWII. The Japanese often planed their battle strategy to fight against him. They had planed their attack at Midway based on his past history. Halsey was sick and was not there and Spruance.showed up and they lost. He won many battles and help win the war in the Pacific. I enjoyed the book..
Very thorough and seemingly fair assessment of the man. I feel a tad kindred with Halsey in some ways. Aggressive and fearless in fight but far from perfect. Really enjoyed this assessment.
William Halsey, became popular in the early years of World War II because he was willing, and eager to fight in the Pacific. He moved forward, taking the fight back to Japan. But celebrity and history have overlooked the man behind the legend. Hughes works to reconcile the two, the need hero and the dedicated Navy man.
Why I started this book: I'm always on the look out for Naval histories and biographies for the library.
Why I finished it: Fascinating and Hughes focus on Halsey's leadership style was inspiring.
One of the better biographies I've read in awhile, the author has the aim of examining the process of how Adm. Halsey went from being a pioneer of machine age naval power, to man of the hour in his nation's time of need, to becoming a caricature of himself, and ultimately winding up becoming something of an embarrassment to and a pariah from the institution he served his whole adult life. In looking for the truth as to what sort of man Halsey really was, the problem was that while the thoughtful listener that illustrates the cover of the book is closer to the real person than the military showman, Halsey appears to have become addicted to publicity and wound up defending his public image to the point that it did him damage with his peers and comrades.
The main example is, of course, the conduct of the battle of Leyte Gulf. Most of the players were prepared to accept that mistakes had been made by all and that it was best to move on, but Halsey never got the message, and he insisted that he bore no culpability at all in his post-war memoir. This is keeping in mind that Halsey was of the generation of U.S. naval officers for whom the command controversies of the Spanish-American War (see the public brawl between William Sampson and Winfield Schley) were an object lesson in the conduct one should not pursue. But if Halsey arguably had orders and doctrine on his side in regards to his conduct in the Philippines, he really had no good defense for not once, but twice, failing to admit responsibility for taking stupid chances in trying to continue military operations in the face of typhoons. A sad turn of events for a man who tried for the most part to maintain an honorable balance between responsibility and humanity.
Much of 'Bull' Halsey legacy and history was a characature of the man. This books does an excellent job of explaining the man. I'm reminded of my father's enthusiasm of Admiral Bull Halsey, he was an inspiration to the troops. I'm also reminded that my father's worst time was a Halsey mistake, typhoon Cobra. This book is well researched, and even handed.
An excellent biography, but no history or biography has ever given me the explanation of why the US Fleet command alternated between Spruance and Halsey. Anyone know?
Now I know. The Navy believed that the Fleet commander would burn himself out if kept in too long. Reasonable in the case of Halsey, but Spruance was so laid backed that he could have done two wars in a row without a break.