Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing

Rate this book
What We Really Value traces the origins of traditional rubrics within the theoretical and historical circumstances out of which they emerged, then holds rubrics up for critical scrutiny in the context of contemporary developments in the field. As an alternative to the generic character and decontextualized function of scoring guides, he offers dynamic criteria mapping, a form of qualitative inquiry by which writing programs (as well as individual instructors) can portray their rhetorical values with more ethical integrity and more pedagogical utility than rubrics allow. To illustrate the complex and indispensable insights this method can provide, Broad details findings from his study of eighty-nine distinct and substantial criteria for evaluation at work in the introductory composition program at "City University." These chapters are filled with the voices of composition instructors debating and reflecting on the nature, interplay, and relative importance of the many criteria by which they judged students' texts. Broad concludes his book with specific strategies that can help writing instructors and programs to discover, negotiate, map, and express a more robust truth about what they value in their students' rhetorical performances.

180 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2003

1 person is currently reading
18 people want to read

About the author

Bob Broad

11 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
14 (51%)
4 stars
7 (25%)
3 stars
5 (18%)
2 stars
1 (3%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for BookChampions.
1,256 reviews120 followers
November 5, 2016
The first two chapters and last chapter gave me a lot to think about as I continue to question the validity and use of rubrics. I continue to find more and more reasons why they are used incorrectly.

I really appreciate the implications of Broad's study, and I find it immensely useful. I do have an issue with the structure of academic texts like this that are based on a controlled study. So many chapters need to be included about the nature of the study that the book ends up feeling more like a thesis or dissertation than a book for a general audience.

I would have loved, instead, a shorter volume—or even better, a killer article for English Journal. But I appreciate this work.
Profile Image for Manda Lea.
22 reviews10 followers
March 17, 2008
Unless you LOVE pedagogy and writing rubrics, this book will bore you.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.