It's not that this book is bad. It's just that I expect my non fiction books to not have glaring errors in them. When the author refers to noted racist Cap Anson as a black baseball player, I lose much of my trust in the book. That he does so in a section that outlines why baseball was segregated - spoiler, Anson played a large role in that - it becomes simply comically bad. It doesn't allow me to enjoy the rest of the book, because facts claimed that I don't know for certain I have to take into question as I'm reading.
Beyond that, the author also makes serveral avoidable mistakes, annoying any baseball fan who is reading the book. And, I must assume, the target audience for this book is baseball fans. As two such examples, the author provides the incorrect first name for Eddie Gaedel, and then when comparing seasons for Doby and Jackie Robinson, refers to the players' OBS, rather than their OPS.
In non baseball detriment, the author claims to want to set historical president around things, and then goes with "for sure reason" when talking about laws that popped up after Grant left office. Hmmm. Did he forget the end of Reconstruction? Is he just lazy?
It's a shame . The parts that focus on Doby himself are quite good.
And Larry Doby deserves better. As the author correctly points out, Doby isn't given his proper credit and never was.
Perhaps, then, the author has simply gone Meta with his decisions, offering up a lackluster book about Doby, echoing his lackluster spotlight and treatment in baseball history?