This book was the second of my GCSE texts. Given my prior enjoyment of 'Of Mice and Men' and my fondness for war books, I was quite looking forward to reading this, and dived eagerly into it straight away.
However, after that first reading, I came away disappointed- the book was not what I had expected at all.
Young soldier, Francis Cassavant, has just returned to Frenchtown after World War ll horribly maimed and disfigured.
With only the clothes on his back, and gun in his bag, Francis is set on his final mission- to find the man who betrayed him in his youth, and make him pay for what he did.
As the days pass in Frenchtown, Francis lives out the post-war period, reliving the days of his childhood as he waits for the return of another supposed hero.
As I mentioned above, when I first read this novella, I was expecting great things, and ultimately didn't think that I received them. I found myself bored, listless, the story tiresome and the characters flat. However, as is the nature of GCSE texts (and any other English Literature study texts, I should think) it's obligatory to read, re-read, and re-read again. You have to know your texts inside out, back to front, and any which way you can think of. And the more I read it, the more I realised that perhaps I had judged it too hastily. It wasn't bad at all- in fact, it was very, very good.
After a while, I could hardly believe that I had initially found the characters dull. I liked them all, especially Francis. It was told in first person, and whilst I'm aware that many writers employ this literary technique, this felt so personal. I almost felt like an intruder, as I followed all of Francis' separate journeys through different stages in his life, eavesdropping on his private thoughts and feelings, experiencing his self-doubt and rejection. I really sympathised with him, and on several occasions, I just wanted to step through the pages and give him a big hug.
I also really liked Nicole, up until a certain point. She wasn't to blame for what happened, and how she reacted, but her behaviour still irritated me. But, prior to that, she came across as a genuinely kind girl, who was very sweet to Francis.
I even liked Larry, to an extent, if 'like' is the right word. I thought he was an intensely interesting and complex character, and I could never quite make up my minds as to whether I admired him, felt sorry for him, or downright disliked him. Was he a victim or a villain? I am still undecided.
Just like 'Of Mice and Men', I thought that 'Heroes' was very clever, and it became more so to me the more times I read it. It was less the actual content, but the structure that made it so. There was the story of Francis's childhood, and his escapades with Larry and Nicole, his experiences in the war, and finally, his post-war life, hiding from the world and waiting for his enemy to come home.
Each individual story is paced nicely, and all three intertwine, all the pieces coming together to form the picture that is Francis' life.
Despite what I said before about it being the structure rather than the content that contributes to the book's success, I find the themes that are interwoven throughout the story to be very effective, particularly that of heroism and what defines it, war in its many forms, love, and the loss of innocence.
I suppose one of the things that is a deciding factor in which books get to be put on the GCSE line-up is how they are written, and in fact, the rich language used is something that all of my GCSE texts have in common, which I love.
Cormier's writing is beautiful and an important tool in conveying all that he wanted to. The quotes are lovely, and sometimes heartbreaking, but all of them memorable, which is the critical thing when you need them for an exam.
So, all in all, I'd say that, although it is not quite my favourite GCSE text, I do still adore it and I think that everyone should give it a go.
I'd rate this book....
8.5 out of 10 stars
'Scared kids, not born to fight and kill...but heroes anyway. The real heroes'- Francis