It gives me no pleasure to rate this book so poorly, and I do not do so because I think Lovelock is dumb or wrong, which he certainly is at least not dumb and probably not entirely wrong.
However, the book is a bore of enormous proportions. Lovelock is in great need of a strong editor who could shape this narrative and focus on the areas that are of greater interest to the reading public. We spend the whole first 100 pages on his life as a child and young person. We spend huge swaths of the book recounting scientific inventions and modifications and ideas that may well have been the subject of some interest to specialists in the field, but that are definitely not the content that most readers of this book will be after.
Lovelock's ideas about Gaia are what interests us, and maybe to a lesser extent his role in the ozone hole discussion that preceded his Gaia work. Gaia, as the astute reader will note, is in the title of the book. Yet, it plays a very minor role in the narrative of Lovelock's life as he tells it.
Again, I do not mean to come across as overly critical. This volume would be a great item to hand down to your grandchildren explaining your life. But as a book to be sold to general audiences, it is so far afield from the purported topic, and so full of tedious and unwelcome detail, that it was a great chore for me to finish.
It is also sprinkled with dubious stray thoughts on non-science topics, including occasional forays into political subjects and health care delivery (based on his own experiences but generalized unhelpfully) as well as a detail-heavy recounting of his carrying on of an extra-marital affair as his wife slowly succumbs to MS. This is material that just did not have to be included here at all.
I've now read four of Lovelock's books and can really only recommend one of them: 1989's Ages of Gaia. He may be an innovative and thought-provoking scientist, but his written output is leaving me cold.