Mahabharata is a tale that contains so many shorter stories and myths that it is almost impossible for any one person to categorically state that he or she has read it in completeness. And this is the basic fact on which this author has written this book to bring to our attention the lesser known tales within that epic. As far as intention is concerned, I would applaud this author for taking this initiative and giving us something to chew upon and learn. However, there were far too many faults in this book to make it anything but an okay read, which was a major disappointment to me as I honestly love Mahabharata as an epic and am constantly in search for new material, new interpretations and definitely more nuggets of wisdom that this epic encompasses within its verses.
Let me start with the good point about this book because it is just a single one - It is a fast paced read, one that you can easily finish in a single setting, without getting bored or distracted. It does contain some good stories from the Mahabharata and does give some insight into the various actions that we have read about or have knowledge of, especially the historical features of a particular decision or act. In this the author has definitely achieved what he wanted to achieve, giving us a brief idea about the whole epic and its underlying tales.
However, as I mentioned, there are far too many cons to make this book a great read. The first one being the misleading title of the book. The book is supposed to contain 51 lesser known tales from the Mahabharata, however, the book contains tales from Indian mythology and is not restricted to the Mahabharata. What makes this more irritating is the fact that the author in the preface has accepted this and warns his readers that the book contains tales other than those in the Mahabharata but his excuse is that it happens in the Mahabharata universe. On reading the book, I found many tales having nothing to do with Mahabharata or its universe but were actually from other mythological tales or incidents. My question here is, why didn't the author simply title his work as "51 lesser known tales from Indian mythology"? Why was it so important to him to put Mahabharata in the title and then give a lame explanation in the preface about it being from the universe and not specifically the epic? This made no sense and was the first irritant in the many that made me relegate this book to a 2-starer.
Moving on, another point of irritation was the narration or should I say the extra commentary provided by the author at the end of some of the tales, his own analysis of the symbolism and effect of the tale, which mostly did not have any basis in fact but was merely an individual interpretation. If the book had been a commentary on the tales of the Mahabharata, where the author is providing a detailed understanding and interpretation of the stories, this would have been acceptable, provided of course the author references to other sources to explain his interpretation. However, this is a book of tales and more importantly the author states at the very beginning that it is the short version of the tales, which he has adopted for the sake of brevity (will come to this point later) and yet instead of presenting the tales as it has been told, he chooses to make personal comments, which has no basis and nor is there any need for it. I wish that instead of making these unnecessary and unwanted comments, the author had instead spent his time fleshing out each story so that it doesn’t come across as something abrupt.
My next grouse with this book is, yes you have guessed it correctly, its brevity. Now, I am all for short reads and short tales and all that jazz but I want that tale, however short it may be, to sound full and complete. In other words, there has to be a logical start and a good end, even if it means taking a few more paragraphs or sentences to do so. However, the author disappoints us here with his ‘brevity’ for the sake of brevity and uses that space instead to provide us with his interpretations, which as I have already said was totally unwanted. The problem wasn’t that all stories suffered from it but that some of them did and they stood out more than the others. It almost felt as if I were jumping from one place to another without any pause or even need to imbibe what I was reading. There was no space for me to dwell on the lessons or morals being told through these tales, almost as if the author thought that there was no need for it. So, while it was a fast paced one, it was jerky and that made me want to throw the book away, which according to me is a mark of a bad book or at least a disappointing one.
I also had some issues with the veracity of the tales. There were some tales that I knew from my reading of other books based on the various Indian mythological stories and to see them being put forth in a strange manner that almost bespoke of the author’s personal issues with it made me feel really disappointed. One tale in particular irked me the most. It was a tale of Ganesha and Karthikeyan, the two sons of Shiva. According to the author, the brothers only felt hatred towards each other or rather Karthikeyan hated Ganesha for his popularity and was constantly sabotaging things or something like that. He goes onto add that Karthikeyan is not revered anywhere in India except maybe in Orrisa. Both these are not true. Firstly, there was only one competition between the two, which definitely angered Karthikeyan for he interpreted the terms of the competition literally while Ganesha interpreted it spiritually. However, this did not mean that the brothers were constantly at war with each other! Secondly, I can confidently state that Tamil Nadu is a state in India where Karthikeyan is revered even today and there are many other states like Tamil Nadu, so it isn’t as if Karthikeyan has no followers or believers today. Given that the author makes such a basic mistake and interprets it so disastrously, I wonder how many of the other tales were really true to their form.
My last grouse with this book is sloppy editing, which made the reading an absolute displeasure. It was almost as if the author spent one night writing this book and the next morning sent it for publication, where neither the publisher nor the editor paid much attention to things like basic sentence construction and spellings. It felt as if the tale superceded everything and that there was no need for a proper language or style to be maintained. While I understand that this book is chiefly meant for the Indian populace and is not really being targeted for a foreign audience, I nevertheless, felt that this was a much needed aspect in this book and that it would have been a much better book, if the author/editor/publisher had taken care of these small things. Who knows, it could have actually resulted in a better presentation of the story with less personal input from the author.
I won’t really recommend this book to anyone, and most definitely not to a person who has no knowledge of Indian myths and Mahabharata as an epic. However, if you don’t fall into the second category and are in a mood for a quick read, you can try this one, but do bear in mind that these stories may not necessarily be true to fact or even scripture. Nevertheless, it is a light read and enjoyable in parts, despite the various issues, one where different people will have different thoughts and interpretations; so I really leave the choice to you.