“You are my vocation. I was made to love you, protect you, through the good and bad, and through every vow that will be asked of me.”
Dear readers: I have a dirty mind, indeed.
I say this because going into this book, I was thinking I was in for a deliciously scandalous read about a woman who falls in love with a priest, a la The Thorn Birds (to make it even dirtier for you, I will confess that I watch The Thorn Birds every Holy Week, because why not watch a scandalous miniseries during the holiest week of the year, hmm?)
However, I was a little mistaken in my initial summary, because the main character falls in love with a man who is studying to
become
a priest, not a man who actually is one. A minor discrepancy, but still scandalous, nonetheless.
Julianne Westcott, a upper-middle class girl living in England, meets said man who is set to become a man of the cloth when she’s visiting the twin brother she’s not supposed to know she has. Blind and deaf since birth, her parents chose to keep Julianne and put her brother in an institution to conveniently forget about him. Since Julianne discovered her parent’s secret, she visits him as often as she can. However, these visits increase in frequency when she encounters the kind yet extremely unavailable groundkeeper, Kyle McCarthy, who is studying to be Catholic priest.
And you thought your first love was a doozy.
I expect you can figure out the rest. They fall in lurv, but have to hide it, cause last time I checked falling in love with soon-to-be Catholic priest was a major no-no. They hide it, they get married, a conveniently timed Blitz raid on England by the Nazis separates them, miscommunication ensues, they reunite, the end. Ta-da!! Plot wise, it’s a fairly predictable novel, but it’s an extremely easy read. The romance was done quite well, and both the main leads (particularly Kyle), were likable.
However, there were two points that rubbed me the wrong way.
As part of my job, I often have to be present at jury selection hearings. One of the questions I hear most often be asked by attorney’s is the demeanor of witnesses. As in, does a juror expect a witness who is testifying to behave a certain way (cry, be angry, etc.) The ideal answer they’re looking for, of course, is no. One person might not respond to a traumatic event in the same way that another person would. In that sense, it would not be seen in a negative light if a witness didn’t cry on the stand. And I get that: people respond to events differently.
This leads to the one part of the novel that I really didn’t appreciate, with that one thing being kept in mind. Julianna and Kyle very much have a ‘will they or won’t they’ relationship for the first half of the novel. Honestly, the tension is so palpable that you kind of want to reach through the book and smush their two faces together so they’ll just kiss already. When he finally does confess his love for her, however, it’s literally at the worst possible time that I could think of: right after the death of his father. He goes to tell Julianne, they talk about it for all of half a millisecond, then immediately proceed to start making out. And that half a page is all the information you’ll be getting about Kyle’s father’s death.
Again, I get it that people respond to things differently. The grieving process is different for everyone. However, it was repeatedly said that Kyle was close to his father and how much he loved him. I expected him to be a little more choked up about it then he was. And for the author to just kind of shuck it off so nonchalantly to make way for more of Julianne and Kyle’s romance really rubbed me the wrong way.
Another thing that irked me was the treatment of Charles, Julianne’s blind and deaf twin. Not his treatment by any of the characters, mind you (expect for his parents, which was abominable), but the author. The brother is the catalyst for Julianne and Kyle even meeting, and he’s a big part of the plot synopsis. So therefore, I expected him to play a bigger part in the novel then he did. But as I was reading along, I was starting to get the feeling the author just wrote the part of the brother to act as said catalyst for the plot. He appears in so few scenes and when he does, Julianne is visiting him not only just to visit him, but to see Kyle (with the latter reason slowly taking over). Charles just appears when it’s convenient for the plot to have him. That frankly didn’t sit well with me at all. One of my most hated tropes is the handicapped character who just serves as a plot foil for the more able-bodied characters. Gah!! It probably wasn’t intentional on the part of the author, but still.
A fairly typical but easy to read WWII romance that’s saved by extremely likable characters and simple plot. More experienced romance readers will probably predict everything that’s going to happen in the book, but the two main leads make it worth the read.