After the death of his grandfather, Thomas Rider heads for Ashland, Alabama, to uncover the truth about his parents, discovering a bizarre place whose fate is intertwined with that of their watermelon crop as well as the mysteries of his own identity. By the author of Big Fish. Reprint.
Daniel Wallace is author of five novels, including Big Fish (1998), Ray in Reverse (2000), The Watermelon King (2003), Mr. Sebastian and the Negro Magician (2007), and most recently The Kings and Queens of Roam (2013).
He has written one book for children, Elynora, and in 2008 it was published in Italy, with illustrations by Daniela Tordi. O Great Rosenfeld!, the only book both written and illustrated by the author, has been released in France and Korea and is forthcoming in Italy, but there are not, at this writing, any plans for an American edition.
His work has been published in over two dozen languages, and his stories, novels and non-fiction essays are taught in high schools and colleges throughout this country. His illustrations have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Italian Vanity Fair, and many other magazines and books, including Pep Talks, Warnings, and Screeds: Indispensible Wisdom and Cautionary Advice for Writers, by George Singleton, and Adventures in Pen Land: One Writer's Journey from Inklings to Ink, by Marianne Gingher. Big Fish was made into a motion picture of the same name by Tim Burton in 2003, a film in which the author plays the part of a professor at Auburn University.
He is in fact the J. Ross MacDonald Distinguished Professor of English, and director of the Creative Writing Program, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, his alma mater (Class of '08). He lives with his wife, Laura Kellison Wallace, in Chapel Hill. More information about him, his writing, and his illustrations can be found at www.danielwallace.org and www.ogreatrosenfeld.org.
Daniel Wallace undoubtedly has a great imagination. His stories are written like sophisticated fairytales; more complex and therefore more meaningful, engaging, and rewarding.
The Watermelon King takes place in the same city Big Fish was, Wallace’s best known work, mostly due to the phenomenal motion picture version. Ashland, Alabama is best known for its Watermelons. At least historically. Once upon a time. Before our protagonist’s mother, Lucy Rider, came into town, with an open mind. Something the Southerners happen to find appalling. Why change their traditions? How dare some stranger come and open their minds to new ideas? They like the way things are. I really liked how the novel was divided into two parts; how this division was done- ingeniously interweaving the two points of view (Ashland’s citizens and Thomas’s).
**** Spoilers ****
At first, all of them find Lucy’s personality magnetic. They fall in love with her, each for their own reasons. The women find her mesmerizingly different; a new friend and new fun. The men, of course, cannot turn a blind eye to her unparalleled beauty. Lucy returns their affections. She has this way of making each one of them feel as if she has chosen them as her favorite. Even the town retard finds his way into her heart. In fact, some say he most of all. When she discovers Iggy’s illegitimacy, she spends hours of her day teaching him how to read.
Everything is great until Lucy finds out the traditional of all traditions, the one that ensures the growth of watermelon in Ashland. Every year, at The Watermelon Festival, the oldest and most loved tradition in all of Ashland, the oldest virgin in the city is paraded in ceremony and the forced to consummate with one of three selected Queens. Finding this understandably cruel and wrong, Lucy claims that she has evidence that Iggy is not The Watermelon King; she was the one who took his virginity. Due to Iggy’s ugliness and retardation, she is hardly believed, but the rules state that they must wait it out for evidence of her claims. Or evidence to the contrary. The Watermelon Festival but two weeks later, there is no festival that year. That year, the watermelons suffer. And all of a sudden, all of Ashland turns against her. Nine months later, her baby is born. She manages to have a friend, Anna, rescue her son by surreptitiously taking him out of town to her father’s. Even more appalled by Lucy’s actions, she is shunned. In every way, this is the end of her.
The rescued baby is Thomas. Thomas Rider. His story is examined in the second part of the novel. His family, as far as he is concerned, is Anna and his grandfather. Thomas’s grandfather is a pathological liar (maybe by choice), creating fictional answering for everything from mundane questions to those more serious like Thomas’s beginnings and in his career as a real estate agent. He is the top selling agent around, almost entirely due to the stories he tells his clients regarding previous tenants, in order to have them believe that they would be able to, for example, channel the spirits of the deceased or be able to strike it rich from oil on the land. In this way, his grandiose stories serve as a vessel for Wallace’s imagination.
When Thomas is of age, with Anna’s blessing, he returns to his birthplace and begins the process of finding himself, finding out who he is. After learning the story of his mother from various sources, he is told that The Watermelon Festival can begin again, now that he has returned; they always knew he would, that it was only a matter of time. As a virgin, he, of course, is to be The Watermelon King. Although he is aware he can simply leave town, something compels him to stay; to see it all out and let his destiny unfold.
As is not always the case, I found the ending well orchestrated. Iggy’s sacrifice, paying his debt to Lucy, was not a good thing, but inevitable in a way. Thomas finally begins to fall in love- also, fittingly, with a young Lucy named after none other than his mother. Like the princess and her prince riding into the sunset, the two of them escape the clutches of Ashland under the cover and distraction of the fire Iggy started. The End.
This novel, set in the small, southern town of Ashland, creates an atmosphere of fable and tall-tale that’s very similar to the one that imbues Big Fish with a sense of magic.
Though the beginning was something of a slow burner, I enjoyed the second half of the book very much and found myself shirking other duties in order to read the last few chapters. The cast of characters is both charming and unnerving. The ideas that Wallace plays with are ones that run deep – identify, family, tradition, sexuality. Despite the thematic gravity and sometimes very dark turns in the story, he handles the narrative with a light hand that keeps you, the reader, from feeling weighted down by the pain and grief that runs through the story.
Despite the many fanciful turns in the events of the novel, the characters seemed very real. Wallace’s characterization is subtle and stretched out over a series of brief encounters that make up the first half of the book as the protagonist, Thomas Rider, interviews citizens of Ashland, the place of his birth, about his mother. Though certainly not “normal” by most standards, you can almost believe that a place like Ashland might exist … and the Watermelon King, too.
Hal Jacobs of the Atlanta Journal, Constitution said it well.
“In The Watermelon King, Wallace hits all the right notes of magical realism, creating a world where the supernatural fits alongside the ordinary, where storytellers stretch the plausible, and terror, fear and violence lurk below the surface.”
What the fuck did I just read? I was supremely uncomfortable for the majority of the book, and I almost didn't finish it. The only part I really enjoyed was when they burned the town down at the end, that was so satisfying! But the entire concept of the book was a town that justifies and mandates the raping of young men, and that's disgusting. I have no idea where Wallace came up with this, and I frankly don't ever want to meet this man. I do not recommend this book.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
I would have entered this before but couldn’t remember the author name. Loved this book so much, always felt it should have been made into a movie. Spooky.
DNF. I got about 40% in and just can't bring myself to finish it. I think this story had a lot of potential, has some interesting language, and I'm generally accepting of slow-burners, but this just didn't move fast enough for my taste or have gripping enough characters to sell me, even close to the halfway point of the book. I picked this book up because I'm a huge fan of Big Fish (both the book and movie), and because I loved/still love the cover design of my edition. Watermelon cults and magical realism? Yes please. I liked the premise, I just think the novel format wasn't the right home for it, in my opinion. This would be an excellent short story, with just a few (or even one) narrator in the vein of Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" or Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery". As a short story, I think this would make a chilling literary piece that could be picked apart in a higher education lit class like the best of them. But as a whole novel? I'm personally not convinced.
I'm still open to experimenting with Wallace's other work, and still love the masterpiece that is Big Fish, but for now I'll accept this book as "not for me," and that's okay.
I read Big Fish, Daniel Wallace's best seller this month too. I found the two stories similar in that both stories are based on fable and tall tales told by one character. While in Big Fish, it's the whole story, it's only in the one part (the story is broken down into 4 parts) of Watermelon King. I felt like I was reading a repeat in parts and I can't understand why an author would do same in two stories. It was also kinda weird that this story is also based in a made up town of Ashland, Alabama and the people are simple and don't like change.
This time Ashland is known for it's watermelons. There's a newbie in town and her name is Lucy Rider. Many people adore her, especially the men who thinks she's the most beautiful women they have encountered. The women who don't are jealous of her.
The town's upcoming Watermelon Festival is approaching and everyone is getting ready for the yearly event. It's been tradition for generations. Everything is going as planned until Lucy finds out how the Watermelon King is chosen and what he has to do to earn it.
It's 18 years later and Lucy's son, Thomas returns to Ashland. His grandfather has told him about Ashland through fable and tall tales. Thomas returns because he wants to see where he was born, where his mother had died and find out the truth. But the people of Ashland have a different idea. They see Thomas as the chosen one, to restore their beloved town and their watermelon reputation.
Практически идеальная книжка по моему вкусу: одна большая тайна, немного сверхъестественного, немного мелодрамы, немного провинциальщины. Ну и волевые и необычные люди. Точнее мама героя. Сам-то он больше похож на щепку, влекомую течением горной речки. Правда мистика развеялась потихоньку, хотя Провидения немного осталось. Молодой человек приехал в Эштон, арбузную столицу. Здесь арбузы всегда росли как проклятые. И проводился арбузный фестиваль, на котором король - последний девственник города - совокуплялся с женщиной, нашедшей золотое семечко. Когда-то давно мать героя заступилась за городского дурачка, которого выбрали в арбузные короли и который не горел желанием выполнять столь почётную роль. Она сказала всем, что он уже не девственник. Так нарушилась традиция арбузных фестивалей. А Люси поплатилась жизнью - её изолировали и при родах никто не вызвал ей врача. Ребёнка увезли к родственникам. И вот он вернулся восстановить свою историю и заодно арбузный фестиваль.
I really wanted to like this one, but it was a bit too out there for me to completely enjoy it. Things I liked: the summery feel, Edmund's realtor stories, the interview set up of part 1, the references to real things and places in Birmingham, Thomas! Things I disliked: literally everyone in the town (especially Carlton and Sugar), the conversations about the king and how people were obsessed with sex (which, to be fair, was a key component of their weirdness), how Iggy was treated, the reveal of who the father was (WHY!!!).
There were so many small tidbits that I thought were insightful into how small town mindsets can make you go along with things you know aren't quite right, how we can get stuck in finding our place, and why things become and are important to us. Overall, just darker than I expected but still interesting.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Thomas scopre in età quasi adulta di essere figlio di una persona speciale, ma lo viene a sapere dai racconti degli artefici del suo destino. Il re dei cocomeri è una bella storia, raccontata bene nonostante la particolarità della narrazione ( la storia è divisa in 3 parti raccontate in modo differente l'una dall'altra), non ci si annoia anzi, le pagine si divorano, si crede di sapere dove si và a parare e poi ci sono piccoli colpi di scena. Di Wallace conosco la storia di Big Fish nonostante abbia visto solamente il film, ma l'idea in sé mi sembrava geniale e in questa storia ci ritrovo molto sia lo stile che i personaggi (voglio sottolineare che la città è la stessa). Consiglio a chi vuole affrontare una lettura spensierata.
This Book is by the author of “Big Fish”. It moves from a small town named Ashland Alabama to B’ham and back to Ashland. The characters “southern charm masks content” in the words of Anna a true friend to Lucy Rider. The people of the town blame Lucy for their downfall. This book has an undertone of the short story by Shirley Jackson “ The Lottery”. The father or Lucy Rider and grandfather of Thomas is similarity to the father in “ Big Fish”. One embellishes his life to make true adventures in to tall tales. The other makes up tales to make life the way he wishes it would be. Dark vengefulness, and hope for the gift of forgiveness and redemption are almost as strong as the characters.
Several people have said, Mr. Wallace should have used the short story for for this one. I couldn't agree more. This would have been one wild ride in short form. However, it is sometimes difficult to condense a tale that comes to you in such a large strain of characters and characters they are, indeed. I'd love to read each one do a monologue about their town or just themselves, that would be interesting. Great way to spend two afternoons. Plus who could say no to this cover version I have, so it now has a space on my shelves with cute covers facing out.
An 18 year old returns to his birthplace to learn of the mother he never knew. Fave quotes: "There is so much for them in the world and yet they refuse to see it…because they're small-minded. Because they come from small towns….people from small towns have small minds, small hearts and a small vision. Most of them anyway. There are exceptions. Some of the ones who get out are okay, but for the most, there's just no hope for them."
It's fun to go back to Ashland, Alabama, which is a part of one of my favorite books of all time, Big Fish by the same author. This book has a lot of the same imaginative wonder and southern charm, but also features a dark undercurrent that sometimes more directly peaks its head out. Small towns are incredibly charming and often incredibly frightening. I think this captured that really well while also having a unique structure. Good read.
Sometimes you read a book and think, "what in the world did I just read?". The way that the novel was put together led to a lack of cohesion and made it feel like two separate stories. The book wasn't bad it just wasn't ordered in a way that benefited the plot.
Una novela inesperada, sorprendente, como ya nos tiene acostumbrados Wallace habla de relaciones complicadas con los padres. Esos padres que no pueden admitir una verdad a secas, que dicen no mentir, solo adornar la realidad. Todavía estoy procesando algunos hechos.
This is a book by the same author that wrote Big Fish. I found this book to just be ok. It starts out with a guy interviewing people to find out about his mother. The second part gives the same interviews in a different perspective. The third part moves on from the first two.
I didn't mind this book. Never boring, definitely original but confusing at parts. The style of it and the way the sections were divided up into different narratives, made it an interesting read.