To be fair, I did accidentally start reading this book not knowing it was a sequel. When I figured it out I did consider quitting. Not going back to read the first one, but quitting because the second book was already doing so little for me. But I ended up powering through the beginning and decided to stick it out.
I am glad I did. As a writer, I always feel like I can learn something from any book I read. This one was a great example of how to blur the line between good and evil characters to make them more complex. I ended up liking the Viking Hakon more than the guy who was supposed to be the protagonist, Owen, whom I found annoying pretty much the whole time.
Does this book have problems? Yes. Enough that I’m not going to go back and read the first one or go out of my way to read her others. Alice is Anne Rice’s sister. Anne’s current work is definitely ridiculous but in her heyday she was unmatched. The early vampire chronicles and the Mayfair trilogy are amazing as is feast of all saints. Because anne wrote the forward to the book and there is a big deal made about Alice being anne’s sister, it without a doubt invites comparison... and Alice doesn’t have her sisters talent for the craft of writing, the lush depths of her work and the lyrical nature of it. If you invite the comparison I’m going to make it.
The story is less than woke at times. I had a major problem with Elspeth actually loving Hakon, because despite his backstory which humanizes him he’s still a violent rapist murderer. It makes sense for her character I guess and it does come around, etc, but the idea itself is something I would never touch on in writing because of the message it sends.
There are some awesome fight scenes that definitely appeal to the dungeons and dragons player that I am, and I’m sure the whole thing was well researched. There were some dragging parts to the plot and the issues I mentioned already but I was satisfied to read the ending.