Reevaluates the ideas of the German general, shows how his writings have been misinterpreted, and applies Clausewitzian theory to twentieth century political history.
Raymond-Claude-Ferdinand Aron (French: [ʁɛmɔ̃ aʁɔ̃]; 14 March 1905 – 17 October 1983) was a French philosopher, sociologist, journalist, and political scientist. He is best known for his 1955 book The Opium of the Intellectuals, the title of which inverts Karl Marx's claim that religion was the opium of the people – Aron argues that in post-war France, Marxism was the opium of intellectuals. In the book, Aron chastised French intellectuals for what he described as their harsh criticism of capitalism and democracy and their simultaneous defense of Marxist oppression, atrocities, and intolerance. Critic Roger Kimball[2] suggests that Opium is "a seminal book of the twentieth century." Aron is also known for his lifelong friendship, sometimes fractious, with philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.[3] He is also known for his 1973 book, The Imperial Republic: The United States and the World 1945-1973, which influenced Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger, among others. Aron wrote extensively on a wide range of other topics. Citing the breadth and quality of Aron's writings, historian James R. Garland[4] suggests, "Though he may be little known in America, Raymond Aron arguably stood as the preeminent example of French intellectualism for much of the twentieth century."
A really good book on Clausewitz, although not for the uninitiated. I recommend it to anyone who is a serious student of military theory who has read Clausewitz and other material that discusses Clausewitz and the context surrounding his thought.
This book looks good on the shelf, and the paperback in particular has a really well done front cover graphic, but unfortunately the book itself is practically worthless. This is not actually a biography of Clausewitz; one is apt to gain far more insight into the character and personality of Professor Aron by reading it. The book seems to be a guide to analyzing the works of Clausewitz, but it is written in such an incredibly boring and opaque fashion that it is damned near useless for any purpose.