How could a 150-page book have anything to teach you about the fundamental topics in its chapters: “1. How to Read, 2. How to Write, 3. How to Research,” etc.?
More specifically, what could it possibly teach you if you are among its target audience of ambitious undergraduate, serious Masters level, or accomplished doctor-level students? I asked myself the same thing when my current Master’s program at the California Institute of Integral Studies recommended it as pre-reading for our program. My son, who is headed off to the Ivy League college, Brown University, this Fall as an undergraduate (yes, I’m a proud papa), scoffed when I told him he should read it: “I already know how to read and write, Dad - I just got into Brown!” (Okay, we’ll work on the humility before he leaves). Conceded that both the title (what if you’re an undergraduate?) and the chapters may be off-putting (sorry, Professor Shore).
Yet, I can’t recommend enough the focused, clear guidance in this concise, well-organized treasure of a book.
Are its claims of teaching you something important about reading, writing, speaking, acting, and researching in Grad. School lofty? Yes. Yes, they are. Does he pull it off? Yes. Yes, he does. In fact, he’s following his own advice: “Answer a Meaningful Question (Shore, Z., 2016, p.123). What if this short, well-organized book really could transform the way you read, write, speak, and research? Well, now that would be something. And it is.
If I had read this book before heading off to get my undergraduate degree in German literature and language at Dartmouth College (another one of those ivies) thirty-three years ago, my scholarship would have been more impactful, my thinking would have been clearer, and most importantly the quality of my life - particularly the quality of my life while writing papers - would have been much, much higher. If I had read it before getting my Masters in International Affairs at Columbia University twenty-four years ago (yah, I know: another Ivy League school - what’s with this guy?!), the same would have been true. At the risk of sounding inflated myself, I’ve sprinkled in my academic laurels to persuade you to take my advice seriously. I want you to read it that much.
Now that I am pursuing my third post-secondary degree, a Master in Counseling Psychology at CIIS, I am super grateful that I’ve found this book. It has helped me accelerate my reading speed, increase my reading retention, improve my critical thinking, better structure my writing process (which makes it more efficient), and clarify effective steps in the research process.
Thank you, Professor Shore, for taking the time out of your scholarship to write this book. Maybe you can follow in Malcom’s footsteps and “make millions and be paid staggering sums to give talks around the world” (Shore, 2016, p. 144), except do it without sacrificing your scholarly principles. By the way, great job following your own advice in the section “Confront Counter-evidence Directly” (pp. 142-4), by hooking the reader a bold claim (Gladwell is the greatest), setting up tension by providing a counter-claim (scholars don’t like him), challenging the counter-claim (scholars don’t realize his contribution), and then throwing us a curve ball to keep us engaged by dismantling all of Gladwell’s “counter-evidence” (he evades rather than confronts the critique against him), and ultimately agreeing with those scholars (don’t be like Malcom if you want to be a scholar). You mirror in your own approach the EXACT content you are trying to teach! I love how you do that throughout the book without “hitting us over the head with it” (oops, a hackneyed cliché, sorry)… without drawing awareness to your cleverness like a bad “dad joke.”
You get an A for content and an A+ for style, Professor Shore.