I’m in two minds about this book. On the one hand, it has one really strong point to recommend it. But on the other hand, there are some minor niggles that bring it down – several minor niggles which add up. As a result it was a story I thoroughly enjoyed and would recommend, but at the same time I can definitely see areas for improvement which I do hope are addressed in the second book.
Let’s discuss the book’s great strength first. The big hook of Between Two Kings is that it plays historical What If? Anyone who’s fascinated by history is likely to have wondered to themselves at some point: “What if this event played out differently?” And certain events in history attract this speculation more than others. What if the Roman Empire had not fallen? What if the Allies had not won WW2? What if foreign colonisation of the Americas had never happened? For anyone who’s an aficionado of Tudor England, as I have been for many years, one that often occurs is: What if Anne Boleyn had not been executed? It’s a compelling hook that draws you in, but even better it does so in an unexpected way. The go-to alternative scenario that usually crops up in answer to that question is that Anne successfully gives birth to the son she miscarried, she thus stays queen and is never brought up on charges. But Between Two Kings does something interesting and takes a later point of divergence: what if Anne were discovered to be pregnant just before her execution, and it was a boy? It’s not so simple to puzzle out as the straightforward alternative scenario that most people think of, and sets the stage for a whole lot of intrigue, rivalry, and behind the scenes political manoeuvring.
As such, the book does several critical things that make it a real page-turner. It taps into our innate curiosity, the idle wonderings and musings we have. It provides all the interest that a history buff could desire, without us knowing what the ending will be. And it is, at least in part, vengeance wish fulfilment. It satisfies that need for justice to be done and injustice to be punished, the part of Anne Boleyn’s story that bothers and appals us because it offends our sense of fairness. The concept of the book is genius. I read it hungrily, wanting to know what would happen. Well of course I did – it’s a book about the survival of a fascinating historical character unjustly condemned. It brings that fantasy to life, and is deeply indulgent in that way. But it did have a couple of distracting niggles scattered throughout.
Proofreading. I don’t know if this was just the kindle edition, but there were irritating typos and places where autocorrect had clearly got a hold of the text and rendered it unreadable. Also the book definitely feels like it finished halfway through. You can have a book series with a bigger overarching plot, but each entry in it should be able to stand on its own. This one doesn’t really have a culmination, and it ends rather abruptly.
Another thing was that it draws heavily from The Tudors. Characters would reminisce about specific things that happened in The Tudors, but not in actual history. When I hit the author’s note at the end, she admits this, but I wish it hadn’t been so. For me, the show was something I consumed only because history enthusiasts were starved of good historicals and sometimes you just take what you can get, and I often found the show rather silly and nonsensical. I’d rather a Tudor set novel didn’t perpetuate some of those silly moments like Anne dancing for King Francis or the inaccurate myths that Thomas Boleyn pimped out his daughter and Jane Parker betrayed her in-laws.
The biggest problem however was with the style of writing. Often the story told rather than showed. Instead of action happening in a scene, frequently characters just descend into narrative thinking things out, or at most dialogue explaining things to each other. I felt like it was explained that a character felt a certain way instead of getting to see them actually demonstrate this. The cast of characters seemed unnaturally small, and seemed to consist of the three kings having conversations with one or two other characters. As a result the story had a strange ambience that did not feel true to life in its lack of complexity or direct action happening. I would like to see the author grow out of this in the next book, because the level of detail given to actual residences and style of attire clearly indicated that she knows her stuff when it comes to the sites and artefacts of the age. It just lacks a bit of storytelling flair.
I have fairly good hopes for the next book, as the story has a really strong hook that is undoubtedly its greatest strength; it just needs polish here and there.
7 out of 10.