Review & analysis.
Did not like this book at all, in fact I hated it. The fact that right from the start it was based on lies, cheating & manipulation by a pair of abusing psychopathic males just turned my stomach. I finished the book giving the author a ‘second chance’ to redeem her-self but in this she failed miserably! My review and analysis are long if you can bear with me, (dealing mainly with the first 40-50 pages) but they are meant to be edifying so that the average reader can get a much deeper understanding of what it is that they are reading & what the author is actually saying. Regardless of whether the author realises it or not. I read this book twice, once to get the gist & secondly to make analysis notes. I have 2 sociology degrees (psyche/counselling majors) & therefore feel qualified to critique this book.
Edgard (Ed) is a manipulative prick, a spoilt ‘mummies boy’ who wants everything his own way. He’s lost everything so he has come to destroy Trevor’s (Trev) marriage regardless of the pain he is about to inflict. (He’s kept tabs on T & C’s life & says he’s ‘passing through’ a total lie). Instead of leaving when he realises that Trev is happy (if he truly loved Trev he would have) he continues with his agenda & manipulates both Trev and Chassie (T’s wife-Chass). Now, he left Trev three & half years ago, he gave up all rights to him and his life and keeps secret his intentions (lying by omission) & befriends Chass with a view to undermining her happiness & inflict pain, a real psychopath. He gets close enough to her to ‘rock the boat’ hoping to destroy the marriage, by using & abusing her kindness, understanding & generosity to get what he wants. I hate this character & saw right through him in the first book & how he ‘groomed’ Trev into a gay relationship.
In the first book Ed tells Trev “You want only what I can give you” & forces Trev to admit that “it never feels this good when he’s fucking a woman as it does when Ed is fucking him!” This whilst Trev’s in his most vulnerable & open position!(pun intended) This is ‘grooming’ him to being gay, but Ed regularly states that he is happy to only take what Trev can give him (double standards) & because Ed is jealous that Trev still wants women. The author calls this love? Yeah right!
In this book RR&R, Ed questions Trev about allowing Chass to use a strap-on for anal play, Trev denies it & Ed forces Trev to admit that his anus is for Ed only, further undermining the marriage, happiness & emotional stability of Trev & Chass & their love for each other. Ed is horrible and Trev is no better because he is a lying, cheating, self-centred, self-involved ‘douche bag’ also wanting it all his own way. Where is the compromise that is essential to all healthy adult relationships? Where is the selfless love? Certainly none in these two males! They are such low life hypocrites!
On the first night when Ed heard them making love & thought that Trev was proving a point that he loved his wife and didn’t want him anymore, if he’d been a decent man & truly loved Trev he would have left the next day, wishing them all the happiness & love in the world. He should have moved on knowing Trev was happy. The old adage: “that if you truly love something, then set it free”, is applicable here. Ed had stated that ’he did not want to be a third wheel’ but what did he do? He stayed & certainly became busy making sure Chass (the supposed love of Trev’s life) was the actual ‘third wheel’. Despicable character!
Now, if Chass is everything in the world to Trev, then why is he prepared to brutally hurt her, risk the farm, his marriage & everything that is supposedly important to him? The story line defies belief. The barn scene typifies this.
In this scene Trev has Chass bound & is getting a ‘blow job’ & fucking her. Ed slyly intrudes on them by remaining in the shadows but seen to Trev & not Chass. Trev does not tell her. Instead of Trev telling him to leave, he continues on allowing Ed to come between them as he started watching, talking and thinking to Ed (who was masturbating) – therefore being unfaithful to his wife whilst he is fucking her. Disgusting! This is abuse! Not just perverted it is actually depraved abuse (Psychological/emotional and physical). This could also be considered rape as there was no consent by Chass for Ed to be there & is unaware. Trev starts using ‘their obviously old personal sex ‘tantric trick’ on Chass & Ed is immediately using it on himself. Trev deliberately uses it knowing that Ed will get off. This is all without Chass’ consent (cannot stress this enough) & Trevs’ taunting, teasing Ed using his wife as a ‘fuck toy’ to do so, turning her into a ‘whore toy’. This is truly depraved and sick! IT IS NOT LOVE! It is not SEXY! The fact that he does this to his wife whilst she is totally open to him, under his control & dominance, at her most vulnerable, shows that he does not love her, is not protecting her, is actually hurting/abusing her & not keeping her safe.(he learnt this from Ed) It shows that he too is a psychopath & will do anything for his own self pleasure at the expense of the ‘supposed love of his life, his everything’!. Where is the caring loving tough alpha cowboy? He is certainly not in this book!
No decent man who truly loved his wife would ever allow this abuse to happen, especially without her CONSENT! He’s the perpetrator no less! These two males have no moral compass or boundaries whatsoever. They are not even just ‘flawed’ characters’, they are cock-centred, lustful, shallow & deceitful psychopaths! No ‘higher enlightened males’ here people, these two are barely above the apes & continually give into their ‘base’ urges. No control, (they go at each other like lustful dogs) yet they want to control others through domination! Does the author actually read what she is writing and ask herself how will my readers interpret this? Is this what I actually want to say? Is this the act of a loving respectful husband? If the author thinks that this is love, well she had better head to the ‘therapy couch’ real quick, because she needs her hear read! FYI, Domestic Violence which this is, does not have to be physical, it’s emotional, psychological, monetary, deprivation of love, non-caring, disrespectful & it can appear to be wrapped in love, when in reality it is not. MORE RESEARCH AUTHOR! Does the abusive partner tell his/her other that he/she loves them whilst abusing them? You bet your ass he/she does! “It is for your benefit & only because I love you” says the perpetrator. I have heard this countless times from clients whilst counselling them! Authors have influence over their readers, especially the non-discerning and it is not acceptable for this author to infer that this has anything to do with love.(It’s about power!) So take note! You have a responsibility to your readers!
When Chass finally sees Ed she meekly goes along with it & does not question her husband at all about it. She is straight, sexually inexperienced & knows nothing of her husbands’ gay past (at this time) so the alarm bells should have been ringing loud and clear for her. Immediately realising that all was not as it seemed. No rocket science needed. If she was a realistic deep character & had any self-respect she would have ended it immediately & there would have been ‘hell to pay.’ Just can’t buy this story, as Chass is supposed to be so ‘emotionally sensitive’ so where was that sensitivity? Where is her anger at being used like this? Where is her anger/hate at Ed for intruding in her personal sex life/ marriage without consent? Where is her angst at the realisation that this is not normal? Well, obviously “Sassie Chassie’ is nowhere to be seen! Just terrible and thoughtless writing!
After 2 weeks of Ed using Chass to undermine the marriage, asking personal questions that he uses as ammunition against them, he goes snooping/sneaking through the tack room, finds his old saddle & confronts Trev in the corral knowing that Chass is likely watching. Regardless, he tries to force Trev into admitting that he loves him as Trev denies it. He will not take ‘no’ for an answer, showing what a low life abuser he really is! When this doesn’t work (he should have let it go at this stage and left) but no, he tackles him, there are punches thrown & still he doesn’t back off. He forcibly kisses Trev continually until Trev gives in & responds. Again without consent! (This is physical & sexual assault). By any standards of cognitive behaviour Ed & Trev are not really in love, they are ‘IN LUST’ as it’s too shallow for it to be anything else. The only love these two males have is for them-selves. Once again the author considers this love – on what planet?
Trev tells Ed “that he loves his wife and she’s not a second choice” but his responses are weak, he should have been absolutely outraged and ordered Ed off the property as Ed had negated all rights when he left Trev originally. No, but the weak plot line has him giving in “wanting what he’d secretly missed for the last three years”. So why in hell did he marry Chass? This makes no sense at all! He knew he was hurting her by his total lack of commitment to his wife/marriage. Deceitful Ed deliberately ‘turns him on’ knowing Chass would see because of the shouting and noise on a quiet ranch- how could she not hear? Making Ed the most ‘cruel’ of men! He makes a ridiculous comment about “fucking away our problems”. This solves nothing as the problem is still there. Three times Trev says no/stop but the ‘kissing abuser’ (a woman would slap a face for this) railroads him and the ‘groomed abusee’ gives in. Then in the quiet they hear the gasp. So obvious!
Chass runs & the asshole husband said “Chassie baby, let me explain” Yeah right! How do you explain that you actually “LOVE” a man more than the love of your life. WTF? In real life you could never come back from this! The marriage would be on the rocks! So the idiot plot has Trev physically restrain his wife (abusive) & his ex-lover calms her down. For God’s sake, talk about from the sublime to the ridiculous. Chass finally takes off but not before Ed tells her if she leaves he will steal her husband from her. Leaving her with little choice! She should have gotten her rifle and permanently damaged the ‘cock sucking pond scum’ (you know where) polluting her property and told them both to go! Oh, but it was not to be & she ends up getting the most awful advice from her husbands’ ex-lover no less (why is this OK?) and within 24 hours she’s back and ready to enter into a ‘menage a trois'. This decision actually makes the character of Chass neurotic/moronic & not the sensitive caring person the author is trying to convince you of. Never mind that triangles have very pointy edges, that inflict serious damage and there is no way that this decision/choice was given enough consideration. God save me from such drivel!
Where was Chass’ anger, shock, angst, grief, betrayal-by the love of her life? And supposed friend? Where was the perusal of every thought word & deed to find what she had missed? What signs had she ignored? How could he do this to her? How could Ed come & hurt/betray her in her own home when she'd shown him kindness? This is how he repays her? How could Trevor say he loves her when it is obvious he loves a man more? Why were men always betraying her? Why was it happening to her? The questions go on & on. Will never be resolved in one day as she’s in shock, traumatised, grieving for all she has lost, her world has fallen apart, so it’s just not possible for her to make any rational decisions in 24 hours! This is just rubbish writing – not penmanship or backed up by any research at all. It shows the authors lack of knowledge and understanding of the human condition. It’s shallow, facetious, lacks any real empathy for Chass’ character. The author has turned the heroine into a neurotic, trivial, vapid, thoughtless & weak minded female fool! Cheating is cheating, the gender is irrelevant!
God save us from authors of this ilk, that allow women to become nothing but vessels for the benefit of male sperm, who allow & enable themselves to be debased (now a self-abuser) for a man who really doesn’t love her and uses/ abuses her as a sex toy: Making her the victim & enabler, of her own & his abuse. Go figure! Chass tells them no cheating behind her back-no touching or anything, but what do they do? They touch & flirt, (in the truck having ‘hard-ons’) basically breaking the rules. How could any self-respecting wife allow her husband & his lover to fuck in the bed beside her while she sleeps? Basically being unfaithful in front of her face for the second time? Once again, the author is showing her lack of understanding of love and its’ dynamics. Jealousy is natural, a protective primal trait!
This all happens before page 40, less than a third of the book & from this point it lost all semblance of a love story & shot into the realm of porn fantasy (totally different genre’). I have read X-rated porn that’s better than this & that’s really saying something. It’s also ridiculous to write of Chass’ relief in finding out her husband was thinking of a man during sex. “Crazy female logic” – not on planet Earth! Where does the author come up with this nonsense? The fact is a woman CAN compete with another woman sexually but not with a man. Not ever! So that puts Chass even further ‘behind the eight ball’ & again gender has nothing to do with cheating or abuse. She really is the ‘third wheel’. The males get to have their cake & eat it too without censure, no equality in this triad relationship – just awful! The author should be ashamed of herself for letting women down!
There is no backlash, no penalty for Trev and Ed – there should be. At least a week should have been given for Chass to determine her future as everything rested on a rational and sound choice. The author could have used that week of angst to write a better book with much deeper meaning/ narrative, giving the readership a more satisfying read.
Manipulative/psychopathic Ed seduces and then makes love to Chass without Trev, (she broke her own rules – why is this OK?) in order to get a night totally alone with Trev, as Ed knows that Chass will be away the next night. No sooner is Trev in the door & he’s at Ed totally forgetting his loving wife, no guilt here. They go at it like rutting mongrels, finish and go upstairs for an ‘all-nighter’. Trev sees the bed & finally has a ‘twinge’ of guilt. WTF? Ed left the bed unmade to show Trev, & alleviate his guilt by telling him he made love to his wife (psychological/emotional abuse). So, it’s now OK to cheat because your wife did it! (two wrongs don't make a right) What low-life, disreputable people the author would have you believe are good guys. No fucking way!!! This book is nasty, badly written, not feasible with shallow characters, will annoy you. So avoid it!