A promising edited collection of essays with some dominant points that doesn't always make it into nuance or detail. Each essay chimes with the overall argument that Indigenous women have not been included in surveys of knowledge, over and beyond the occlusion of Indigenous knowledge in general. This is generally asserted rather than evidenced, which is fine. Many essays connect this to past repressive legislation or the cultural genocide desired by Duncan Campbell Scott (who may not have said, "to kill the Indian in the child" but who certainly wrote "I want to get rid of the Indian problem"). Instead of searching thoroughly for instances where Indigenous women are ignored, what many essayists here do is return to various place-specific communities and traditions to discover what kinds of perspectives Indigenous women offer. There is a great deal of care here about who holds knowledge and who should talk about knowledge, which is admirable.
The strongest essays are an early re-telling of a creation myth with discussion by Kahente Horn-Miller and a closing essay by Zoe Todd. Common themes emerge of women's total integration into food provision, land management, and medicine gathering. Other themes of regional similarities also emerge, most clearly in the strongest essays which were focused on Arctic or sub-Arctic communities.
At the end of the volume, I was left with a feeling of superficiality - the lack of regional specificity (one essay considers Latin America, the others are focused on different regions in Canada) and the focus on declaring value in the project overall tended to preclude more nuanced or deeper treatments of the various communities, perspectives, and histories of Indigenous women discussed. Some essays also seemed half-written or under-edited. For example, one essay uses the terms "blacks" and "African Americans" interchangeably, which seems inconsiderate at best; the occasional use of critical theory seems an afterthought and unnecessary (is Foucault really the best source for thinking about knowledge and power from an Indigenous position?); other essays draw on old fieldwork but might have focused on new changes (if possible).
I'd hope that it is a friendly critique to surmise that this volume is an effective introduction to the subject, but that it opens more doors than it enters.