So, I'm a sociology student, currently taking one year off to study Thai in Thailand. Because of this maybe unusual combination, I was thrilled to find this book in the Chulalongkorn bookstore: a book that can blend both the area sociology and the area of Thai culture/language. I sort of expected an interesting use of Bourdieu's theory, maybe similar to how he himself studied different fields, but adding a cultural perspective. Here is where I got a bit disappointed.
I do think this book gives interesting perspectives of Thai culture, and with the expressions and word discussions it's also interesting for a Thai language student. I believe any westerner who has been to Thai weddings, funerals, monk ceremonies or similar events will recognize how face is an important part of these events. It is also interesting to start thinking of Thai perspective on indebtedness, and how (some) people move between areas of influence and power. This book has definitely helped me put words on impressions and feelings from being in Thailand.
What I do feel this book lacks is connection to actual events in society. There is no analysis of any actual leader in the whole book. The author refers to the ethnological research that he has done in preparation for this book - but I feel like that material is used sparingly, maybe more as a support for his own theories rather than as theories growing out from the ethnographical material. To me, there is a feeling of me as a reader being expected to take everything at face value, with the encouragement that I will see the truth of this if I just look around in society. This leaves me with the feeling that maybe the book just oversimplifies culture and society, and therefore lacks value to use as a model for understanding leadership.
If you want some new perspectives on Thai society and language, this book is really good. But, this book leaves you on your own in the actual analysis of events in Thai society.