John Eldredge authored one of my favorite books of all time - Wild at Heart. I loved it so much, I bought multiple copies and gave them away to friends. It is in that enthusiasm that I decided to tackle Moving Mountains, and now, how I wish I hadn't. As much as I loved Wild at Heart, I fought to just finish this book. It is that disappointing.
The premise of the book is simple: "Some prayers work, and some prayers don’t." Eldredge calls on numerous natural phenomena and human circumstances to buttress this obvious point. Some things work, and some things don't. Some methods work, and some methods don't. Some techniques work, and some don't. It's no different (to Eldredge) with prayer.
Now, that brings us to our first challenge. What IS prayer that works? Is prayer that works prayer that cures me of COVID-19 with no long-term side effects? Is prayer that works prayer that lands me a promotion at work? Or, drawing from the introduction to the book, is prayer that works prayer that preserves my home at the property line while every other home in the neighborhood is reduced to ashes? What exactly is "prayer that works?" Eldredge never defines that.
From that baseline, the book becomes a whirlwind of emotionalism and formula. Eldredge is clearly enthusiastic about his approach to prayer, and at times it comes across that the reader is supposed to buy into the validity of Eldredge's approach and understanding of the prayer-process simply because he is so enthused about it. His arguments for his methodology are borderline anecdotal.
Eldredge begins building his case based on an authority he identifies as being granted to us as joint-heirs with Christ. Based on that authority, Eldredge begins various rebukes and declarations against certain things, and similarly makes decrees and declarations positively toward what he has decided should happen. He gives orders to spirits, calls down judgments, binds demons. He "brings" the blood of Jesus against this and against that. It's all very formulaic and done incorrectly will not yield the results that constitute the undefined "success" in prayer that we are after.
There were times when the prayer methodology put forth by Eldredge seemed to differ little from pagan rituals with long-winded incantations, anointings, declarations, and proclamations. Some of his example prayers went on for pages at a time (Think Matthew 6:7, and being heard for your many words). At times he encourages us to just repeat the same word or phrase again and again, almost like chanting a mantra. All of this was (to me) contradictory to the relationship with God about which he wrote so eloquently, that had now devolved into a chanted script-prayer that said in the correct way, and with the correct anointing and consecrating acts would yield a successful result.
At one point, Eldredge blamed a failed prayer on the fact that the one being prayed over "hated" his body. In John's logic, how can Jesus bless a body that the owner hates? Similarly, trouble at home was/is blamed on the fact that the new owners did not invest hours and days consecrating every room, and every door, and every piece of window trim. The evil of the previous occupants was apparently still causing trouble for the new owners. He even mandates that one must consecrate hotel rooms prior to staying in them. It does not border on superstition. It is neck-deep in it.
I am reticent to post this overly negative review but feel compelled to do so given my love of other Eldredge writings combined with the reality that this is just exceedingly bad theology. With the plethora of excellent material available on the market, your money can and will be better spent elsewhere.