What do you think?
Rate this book


320 pages, Paperback
Published October 12, 2015
1. Some of the terms aren't entirely or clearly explained, so you might learn the terminology but will still have doubts over what they exactly mean. Of course, this only reminds me that not every Sanskrit word has a perfect equivalent in English and this is a partial reason for the problem. The book is still understandable, even if you don’t understand Sanskrit.
2. Not every suggestion in the book is straightforward or manageable. Like, choose your profession according to your ‘dosha’. How is it possible in today’s world!? Some treatments seem to be better opted for under the guidance of a skilled Ayurvedic physician than being attempted at home.
3. Sometimes, a topic is raised but not explored. For instance, she mentions myopia as being a disease of the mind than of the eyes and that a doctor had found that this can be reversed through Ayurveda. How? It isn't explained.
4. As with most such books, there is a bit of bias towards Ayurveda and Indian methods with some exaggeration of merits. For instance, she mentions how, when working as a physician, she sang Indian classical songs to American children while drawing blood for medicational purposes, and this had a calming effect on them. Honestly, I'm sure the children would have stayed calm even if she had sung soothing English rhymes or lullabies. (Tried-and-tested method with my kids during injections.) Soft music is what calms, not just classical Indian music.
5. My biggest complaint about the book: it regularly trashes other cultures (primarily Western) and medicinal approaches. I’ll rephrase what I usually say to religious bigots. Just like insulting other religions doesn’t make yours better, insulting other systems of medicine or other styles of thinking doesn’t make Ayurveda better. Show the benefits of Ayurveda and they are enough to show the merit of this traditional approach to living.