What do you think?
Rate this book
A Study of History #2
مختصر دراسة للتاريخ، الجزء الثاني
يذهب توينبي في هذا الكتاب إلى أن دراسة التاريخ تعني - في حقيقتها - دراسة المجتمعات أو الحضارات، وهو يقسمها إلى إحدى وعشرين حضارة ، لم يتبق منها في زماننا الذي نعيشه سوى خمس حضارات هي المسيحية الغربية، والمسيحية الأرثوذكسية، والإسلامية، والهندية، والشرق الأقصى، ثم مخلفات حضارات متحجرة غير معينة الشخصية كاليهودية، يدور الكتاب حول ثلاثة محاور: (انبعاث الحضارات، وارتقاء الحضارات، وانهيار الحضارات).
بخصوص انبعاث حضارة ما فإن توينبي يصدف عن الفكرة التي تذهب إلى تفوق عرق ما وتفرده بصنع الحضارة، فالأعراق - في معظمها - ساهمت في صنع الحضارات وفي تقدمها، كما أنه يصدف عن البيئة الجغرافية كعامل أهم في انبعاث الحضارة، ويرى توينبي أنه بين إحدى وعشرين حضارة هناك خمس عشرة حضارة تتصل بصلات البنوة بحضارات سابقة عليها، فالحضارة الإسلامية - على سبيل المثال - هي محصلة اندماج حضارتين كانتا متميزتين في الأصل هما الإيرانية والعربية وهما - معاً - ترجعان إلى حضارة مندرسة هي الحضارة السورية التي تتفرع بدورها من الحضارة السومرية.
رابط تحميل مباشر للكتاب بكامل أجزاؤه الأربعة: http://www.4shared.com/rar/FdxOu8lXba...
بخصوص انبعاث حضارة ما فإن توينبي يصدف عن الفكرة التي تذهب إلى تفوق عرق ما وتفرده بصنع الحضارة، فالأعراق - في معظمها - ساهمت في صنع الحضارات وفي تقدمها، كما أنه يصدف عن البيئة الجغرافية كعامل أهم في انبعاث الحضارة، ويرى توينبي أنه بين إحدى وعشرين حضارة هناك خمس عشرة حضارة تتصل بصلات البنوة بحضارات سابقة عليها، فالحضارة الإسلامية - على سبيل المثال - هي محصلة اندماج حضارتين كانتا متميزتين في الأصل هما الإيرانية والعربية وهما - معاً - ترجعان إلى حضارة مندرسة هي الحضارة السورية التي تتفرع بدورها من الحضارة السومرية.
رابط تحميل مباشر للكتاب بكامل أجزاؤه الأربعة: http://www.4shared.com/rar/FdxOu8lXba...
- GenresHistoryNonfiction
514 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1934
6 people are currently reading
358 people want to read
About the author
Arnold J. Toynbee
691 books520 followersNot the same as Arnold Toynbee, economist and nephew of Arnold Joseph Toynbee
British educator Arnold Joseph Toynbee noted cyclical patterns in the growth and decline of civilizations for his 12-volume Study of History (1934-1961).
He went to Winchester college and Balliol college, Oxford.
During both world wars, he worked for the foreign office. He additionally published Nationality and the War (1915), The Armenian Atrocities: The Murder of a Nation (1915), The German Terror in France: An Historical Record (1917), and Turkey, a Past and a Future (1917). He attended the peace conference of Paris in 1919 as a delegate.
From 1919 to 1924, Arnold J. Toynbee served as professor of modern Greek and Byzantine at King's college, London. From 1925, Oxford University Press published The Survey of International Affairs under the auspices of the royal institute of international affairs, and Toynbee, professor, oversaw the publication. From 1925, Toynbee served as research professor and director at the royal institute of international affairs. He published The Conduct of British Empire Foreign Relations since the Peace Settlement (1928).
His first marriage to Rosalind Murray produced three sons and ended in divorce in 1946. Toynbee, professor, then married Veronica M. Boulter, his research assistant. He published Civilization on Trial (1948).
Toynbee served as research professor and director at the royal institute of international affairs until 1955.
People published best known lectures of Toynbee, professor, in memory of Adam Gifford as An Historian's Approach to Religion (1956). His massive work examined development and decay. He presented the rise and fall rather than nation-states or ethnic groups. According to his analysis, the welfare depends on ability to deal successfully with challenges.
He also published Democracy in the Atomic Age (1957), Christianity among the Religions of the World (1958), and Between Niger and Nile (1965).
He died in York, North Yorkshire, England.
British educator Arnold Joseph Toynbee noted cyclical patterns in the growth and decline of civilizations for his 12-volume Study of History (1934-1961).
He went to Winchester college and Balliol college, Oxford.
During both world wars, he worked for the foreign office. He additionally published Nationality and the War (1915), The Armenian Atrocities: The Murder of a Nation (1915), The German Terror in France: An Historical Record (1917), and Turkey, a Past and a Future (1917). He attended the peace conference of Paris in 1919 as a delegate.
From 1919 to 1924, Arnold J. Toynbee served as professor of modern Greek and Byzantine at King's college, London. From 1925, Oxford University Press published The Survey of International Affairs under the auspices of the royal institute of international affairs, and Toynbee, professor, oversaw the publication. From 1925, Toynbee served as research professor and director at the royal institute of international affairs. He published The Conduct of British Empire Foreign Relations since the Peace Settlement (1928).
His first marriage to Rosalind Murray produced three sons and ended in divorce in 1946. Toynbee, professor, then married Veronica M. Boulter, his research assistant. He published Civilization on Trial (1948).
Toynbee served as research professor and director at the royal institute of international affairs until 1955.
People published best known lectures of Toynbee, professor, in memory of Adam Gifford as An Historian's Approach to Religion (1956). His massive work examined development and decay. He presented the rise and fall rather than nation-states or ethnic groups. According to his analysis, the welfare depends on ability to deal successfully with challenges.
He also published Democracy in the Atomic Age (1957), Christianity among the Religions of the World (1958), and Between Niger and Nile (1965).
He died in York, North Yorkshire, England.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
November 14, 2025
I'm starting to become much more familiarized with Toynbee’s conceptual landscape, and I've got to say, I definitely enjoyed this volume more than the first. Toynbee’s historical acumen truly is astonishing and he was able to show that much more this time around.
The overriding theme for this volume was finding 'The Golden Mean.' This represents the sweet spot in his framework where the fringe barbaric tribes, left over from previous civilizations, are confronted with just a formidable enough external challenge to spark the kind of energy necessary for a new civilization to take root. A fascinating and powerful idea for understanding the genesis of complex societies.
About the last quarter of the book, Toynbee especially focuses on the post-Hellenic interregnum, which saw a fierce battle over who would be the true successors of Rome. It’s important to grasp that Toynbee’s civilizational framework does not see “the West” as including the Greek and Roman world, but rather, they together represent “Hellenic civilization,” which is merely apparented to Western Christendom. Understanding these distinctions is key to following his argument.
Also, being a geography nerd in the modern era is so awesome. I couldn’t imagine having to read this without the luxury of Google Earth! It makes tracing these ancient borders and civilizational shifts much easier and much more engaging.
On to Volume III...
The overriding theme for this volume was finding 'The Golden Mean.' This represents the sweet spot in his framework where the fringe barbaric tribes, left over from previous civilizations, are confronted with just a formidable enough external challenge to spark the kind of energy necessary for a new civilization to take root. A fascinating and powerful idea for understanding the genesis of complex societies.
About the last quarter of the book, Toynbee especially focuses on the post-Hellenic interregnum, which saw a fierce battle over who would be the true successors of Rome. It’s important to grasp that Toynbee’s civilizational framework does not see “the West” as including the Greek and Roman world, but rather, they together represent “Hellenic civilization,” which is merely apparented to Western Christendom. Understanding these distinctions is key to following his argument.
Also, being a geography nerd in the modern era is so awesome. I couldn’t imagine having to read this without the luxury of Google Earth! It makes tracing these ancient borders and civilizational shifts much easier and much more engaging.
On to Volume III...
January 11, 2016
In this sequel to Volume 1, which introduced the concept of historical study and attempted to set the stage on the discussion of the geneses of civilizations, Toynbee develops the principles and completes the description on the geneses of civilizations. The theory of Challenge and Response that postulates the development of civilization as a response to challenges coming from human and physical environments is further elaborated and concluded with a flourish. The author categorizes the challenges as originating from hard geography, new ground, blows and pressures from neighbouring societies and also penalization from a dominant counterpart. With a multitude of illuminating examples, each of the postulates is examined threadbare and proved. In the end, the idea of a ‘Golden Mean’ is introduced, that the individual societies’ civilizational response to challenges will be the maximum when the harshness of it is at an optimum – not too harsh or too easy. The book also contains a hypothetical analysis of the course history would have followed, if several abortive civilizations had been able to fend off their devastation against their foes that resulted in their annihilation at various points in time.
The second volume begins with a categorical debunking of the myth that civilizations emerge at sites where nature provides man with bountiful produce. Toynbee establishes that the opposite is true in this case, that is, whenever the land is sufficiently fertile for agriculture, or packed with game, the societies inhabiting these gardens of Eden never pass out of the primitive stage. Civilization emerges when the terrain is so unproductive that the society makes hard decisions about how best to convert the challenge they are facing into a stimulus for change. The empirical study in support of this argument is replete with examples from around the world. We see it in Roman Campagna, in Capua, in Central America and may other places. Then, the stimulus exerted by hard countries work out miraculous pathways for the society to expand and impose its will on its less adventurous neighbors. A case of Attica and Boeotia in Greece extols the point in convincing detail. Boeotia is an agriculturally well endowed country which presents no challenge to the resident. This soporific affect on the moral fiber of the society has caused unmitigated reversals in the political front, as Boeotia was always a subjugated neighbor among her peers. Attica was different in that the land was rocky, with poor rainfall and unfit for cultivation of grain. So the inhabitants tried olive as the crop. The fruit and oil it produced had to be sold in overseas markets for Attica to import its food grains. This caused the Attic people to develop commercial ties with cities in the Aegean basin and to cultivate a powerful military regime that was maritime in its scope. This affluence paved the way for the efflorescence of ancient Greece. This example may be correlated mutatis mutandis to other places and the idea is the same.
New territory and human interaction are the cause of stimulus that is the fountain head of the birth of civilizations. When societies acquire new ground by conquest or assimilation, its institutions flourish on virgin soil much deeper than the place of origin. Being an empirical study, there is no dearth of examples suitably dressed up to stand witness to the author’s theory. He makes a curious observation regarding Hinduism’s growth in South India in this regard – India’s ancient religion grew out of the Indic Civilization and crowned as its universal church in the Gangetic plain. It percolated to the south during the first few centuries of Common Era and has struck deeper roots there than on the shores of the Ganga where it sprouted. A related source of stimulus is the interaction with barbarians outside the pale who are generally at loggerheads with the civilization in question. Toynbee argues that the vitality originated from the stimulus obtained by pressure from outside plays a crucial role in the maturing of a civilization. Again, the arguments are supported by a plethora of samples. The life strength of the society will be concentrated on the frontier marches in its all out bid to win over the outsiders. And once its objective is vindicated, the stimulus disappears and the locus of the creative spirit moves again to another frontier where this civilization is threatened by external human factors.
The argument in this volume concludes with the formulation of a theory of the ‘Golden Mean’. Challenge and response don’t work in a linear way. When the challenge goes on increasing, response breaks down at some point, from the excess stimulation. Similarly, when it goes down, response may fail to be produced. The ideal return is generated when the challenge is optimized. One example, out of the several cited, proves the point. The Scandinavian society had its home in Norway, but being adventurous, they migrated, and in a series of explorations called Viking invasions colonized Iceland and Greenland. The flower of Scandinavian civilization blossomed in Iceland, where their social, political and literary achievements far surpassed those at their home in Norway. This is due to the lack of challenge in Norway, but which existed in Iceland due to the rugged terrain and harsh climate. However, the stimulation thus originated in Iceland couldn’t be sustained in Greenland where the harshness multiplied manifold and the budding civilization withered. With the establishment of the concept of the Golden Mean, Toynbee ends his second volume, by formulating the principles that lead to geneses of civilizations.
Toynbee’s pioneering effort to formulate a theoretical framework to the flow of history doesn’t have parallels among scholars in the wideness of cited examples and the depth of analysis of the events. But a few chinks in the armor may be identified. As a part of justification for the theory of stimulus from difficult terrain, he identifies a location in New England which the initial English-speaking conquerors had abandoned when they moved on to the west in America’s bid to claim the whole landmass between the oceans. French Canadians filled in the vacuum left behind by the founding fathers. The author observed the newcomers at work in this town, and then speculates that the country was equally challenging as it was when it was first subdued, and in due course, the new inhabitants may assume the mantle of kicking forward the onward march of civilization of their own. But this assertion turned out to be false, with the benefit of hindsight. The French newcomers merged gradually into the melting pot of American society, without leaving a trace of the constituents’ origins. Likewise, the author’s guess falls short of what actually happened in China. Its capital frequently changed between Peking and Nanking. The former was nearer to the barbarian frontier and was ideally suited to handle them with its proximity to the recalcitrant border. However, by the turn of 20th century, these nomads were assimilated to the Chinese civilization that they were no longer alien. Around this time, the capital was again shifted to Nanking as a result of popular uprising and Toynbee makes a prediction from his theory that the capital may now stay in the south, as barbarians’ menace had abated in the North and the stimulus disappeared. But again, we know that the capital was once more moved to Peking, where it stays at present. On the other hand, the author’s prescient doubts about the viability of newly formed Balkan states on the principle of national sovereignty after the end of World War 1, is proved true by later events.
The author’s outlook is scholarly, universal and liberal if we examine the content. However, non-European readers may discern a shade of mild imperialism dancing between the lines. The merits and achievements of Western Christian Civilization are heralded in every sentence he writes in this regard. No doubt about the merits of the civilization in conquering every nook and cranny of the modern world is ever expressed. Toynbee in fact believes that Africans deserve to be under European occupation for their own good! As he says about Abyssinia in 1920s, (modern Ethiopia), “she is a byword for disorder and barbarity….In fact, the spectacle presented by the one indigenous African state that has succeeded in retaining its complete independence is perhaps the best justification that can be found for the partition of the rest of Africa among the European powers” (p.365).
The book is highly recommended to serious readers of history.
The second volume begins with a categorical debunking of the myth that civilizations emerge at sites where nature provides man with bountiful produce. Toynbee establishes that the opposite is true in this case, that is, whenever the land is sufficiently fertile for agriculture, or packed with game, the societies inhabiting these gardens of Eden never pass out of the primitive stage. Civilization emerges when the terrain is so unproductive that the society makes hard decisions about how best to convert the challenge they are facing into a stimulus for change. The empirical study in support of this argument is replete with examples from around the world. We see it in Roman Campagna, in Capua, in Central America and may other places. Then, the stimulus exerted by hard countries work out miraculous pathways for the society to expand and impose its will on its less adventurous neighbors. A case of Attica and Boeotia in Greece extols the point in convincing detail. Boeotia is an agriculturally well endowed country which presents no challenge to the resident. This soporific affect on the moral fiber of the society has caused unmitigated reversals in the political front, as Boeotia was always a subjugated neighbor among her peers. Attica was different in that the land was rocky, with poor rainfall and unfit for cultivation of grain. So the inhabitants tried olive as the crop. The fruit and oil it produced had to be sold in overseas markets for Attica to import its food grains. This caused the Attic people to develop commercial ties with cities in the Aegean basin and to cultivate a powerful military regime that was maritime in its scope. This affluence paved the way for the efflorescence of ancient Greece. This example may be correlated mutatis mutandis to other places and the idea is the same.
New territory and human interaction are the cause of stimulus that is the fountain head of the birth of civilizations. When societies acquire new ground by conquest or assimilation, its institutions flourish on virgin soil much deeper than the place of origin. Being an empirical study, there is no dearth of examples suitably dressed up to stand witness to the author’s theory. He makes a curious observation regarding Hinduism’s growth in South India in this regard – India’s ancient religion grew out of the Indic Civilization and crowned as its universal church in the Gangetic plain. It percolated to the south during the first few centuries of Common Era and has struck deeper roots there than on the shores of the Ganga where it sprouted. A related source of stimulus is the interaction with barbarians outside the pale who are generally at loggerheads with the civilization in question. Toynbee argues that the vitality originated from the stimulus obtained by pressure from outside plays a crucial role in the maturing of a civilization. Again, the arguments are supported by a plethora of samples. The life strength of the society will be concentrated on the frontier marches in its all out bid to win over the outsiders. And once its objective is vindicated, the stimulus disappears and the locus of the creative spirit moves again to another frontier where this civilization is threatened by external human factors.
The argument in this volume concludes with the formulation of a theory of the ‘Golden Mean’. Challenge and response don’t work in a linear way. When the challenge goes on increasing, response breaks down at some point, from the excess stimulation. Similarly, when it goes down, response may fail to be produced. The ideal return is generated when the challenge is optimized. One example, out of the several cited, proves the point. The Scandinavian society had its home in Norway, but being adventurous, they migrated, and in a series of explorations called Viking invasions colonized Iceland and Greenland. The flower of Scandinavian civilization blossomed in Iceland, where their social, political and literary achievements far surpassed those at their home in Norway. This is due to the lack of challenge in Norway, but which existed in Iceland due to the rugged terrain and harsh climate. However, the stimulation thus originated in Iceland couldn’t be sustained in Greenland where the harshness multiplied manifold and the budding civilization withered. With the establishment of the concept of the Golden Mean, Toynbee ends his second volume, by formulating the principles that lead to geneses of civilizations.
Toynbee’s pioneering effort to formulate a theoretical framework to the flow of history doesn’t have parallels among scholars in the wideness of cited examples and the depth of analysis of the events. But a few chinks in the armor may be identified. As a part of justification for the theory of stimulus from difficult terrain, he identifies a location in New England which the initial English-speaking conquerors had abandoned when they moved on to the west in America’s bid to claim the whole landmass between the oceans. French Canadians filled in the vacuum left behind by the founding fathers. The author observed the newcomers at work in this town, and then speculates that the country was equally challenging as it was when it was first subdued, and in due course, the new inhabitants may assume the mantle of kicking forward the onward march of civilization of their own. But this assertion turned out to be false, with the benefit of hindsight. The French newcomers merged gradually into the melting pot of American society, without leaving a trace of the constituents’ origins. Likewise, the author’s guess falls short of what actually happened in China. Its capital frequently changed between Peking and Nanking. The former was nearer to the barbarian frontier and was ideally suited to handle them with its proximity to the recalcitrant border. However, by the turn of 20th century, these nomads were assimilated to the Chinese civilization that they were no longer alien. Around this time, the capital was again shifted to Nanking as a result of popular uprising and Toynbee makes a prediction from his theory that the capital may now stay in the south, as barbarians’ menace had abated in the North and the stimulus disappeared. But again, we know that the capital was once more moved to Peking, where it stays at present. On the other hand, the author’s prescient doubts about the viability of newly formed Balkan states on the principle of national sovereignty after the end of World War 1, is proved true by later events.
The author’s outlook is scholarly, universal and liberal if we examine the content. However, non-European readers may discern a shade of mild imperialism dancing between the lines. The merits and achievements of Western Christian Civilization are heralded in every sentence he writes in this regard. No doubt about the merits of the civilization in conquering every nook and cranny of the modern world is ever expressed. Toynbee in fact believes that Africans deserve to be under European occupation for their own good! As he says about Abyssinia in 1920s, (modern Ethiopia), “she is a byword for disorder and barbarity….In fact, the spectacle presented by the one indigenous African state that has succeeded in retaining its complete independence is perhaps the best justification that can be found for the partition of the rest of Africa among the European powers” (p.365).
The book is highly recommended to serious readers of history.
October 25, 2018
اهم ما كتب في الجزء الاول كان عن التحدي و الاستجابة
الجزء الثاني ... الاعتزال و العودة
الجزء الثاني ... الاعتزال و العودة
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews