Well to tell the truth, I simply had to read Mick Inkpen’s 1991 picture book Kipper (when I noticed the book title on Open Library) because our Rottweiler when I was a child (and a teenager) was in fact also named Kipper.
And indeed, this sense of family nostalgia and fond remembrances certainly has made me appreciate Mick Inkpen writing about and illustrating a story about a delightful and funnily entertaining canine with the exact same name as my, as our treasured family dog (and to smile at the fact that Kipper as a name for a dog is obviously acceptable and not even all that inherently strange, unlike a schoolmate tried to make me believe when I told her our Rottweiler’s name in grade six).
However, even though I obviously and of course adore the book title of Kipper and also think that Mick Inkpen’s illustrations of Kipper the dog are colourfully expressive and definitely supremely cute (albeit I personally would much rather have Kipper be a larger breed like a Labrador, a German Shepherd, a Golden Retriever or naturally a Rottweiler), quite frankly, the entire storyline of Kipper almost immediately becomes a bit too unrealistic and too anthropomorphic for me. Because even though it is certainly sweet and also more than a bit thoughtful that Kipper finally after trying to “upgrade” his sleeping arrangements realises that his old dog basket, his blanket and his toys are much more to his personal liking and will also make him sleep much better than any of the new implements and ideas he has been trying, honestly, I most definitely would in particular enjoy Mick Inkpen’s printed words considerably more if Kipper the dog were not seen and described as talking and acting very much like a human, thus leaving me with a definite appreciation of Mick Inkpen’s combination of text and images but also not really totally textually enjoying just how overly humanised Kipper is as a story in and of itself, as I really do think that Kipper’s dialogues and that it is he himself who tries to change and upgrade his sleeping quarters make him as a character not dog-like enough for my reading tastes, make Kipper too much like a person.
And finally, after having briefly checked the remaining Kipper books, I do think that they would more than likely all be rather too much into making Kipper speak and act like a human being for me to continue on with the series (although I do believe that for many children, Mick Inkpen’s combination of an engaging narrative and fun illustrations would probably be a total hit).