Random thoughts after reading this and talking about it on various threads...
Thought 1... The bdsm was waaaaaay out of my comfort zone and I never, ever, never want to read the like again, but I'm not really complaining about that - there was the warning of bdsm, kinky bdsm at that after all.... what really got to me was, as I suspected it would be after reading some reviews (but hoped it wouldn't), the 180 degree personality change in how Tex said his bdsm lifestyle is (in Shooter) to how he conducted that with the heroine (in Tex).
Thought 2.... For me the biggest Wallbanger of recent times is Tex (Burnout 2) by Dahlia West. I loved book 1, and though I might not have been expecting to enjoy book 2 as much due to the expected bdsm, she'd set Tex up as this wonderful, adorable character (who, even though was into bdsm, did it in a caring, appreciative, sexy manner). I mean she even went to the extent in book 1 of having him explain to his army buddies all about his bdsm lifestyle, how he carries that out, that he isn't about an abuse of power, he doesn't do it to humiliate, hurt, frighten, disrespect intimidate or threaten the woman. How he wants a woman who isn't a submissive but would be one for him, a woman he could teach how to be what he wants. How she would be that for him and him ALONE, and how that would be such a gift that he would absolutely treasure... then in his own book, he does the exact opposite to all of that in EVERY way - making him basically a complete liar and turning him into this selfish, non-trustworthy, non-respectful, abusive creep. He doesn't teach her or bring her in slowly or explain much at all, he shows no patience with her and when she doesn't "get" it quickly enough for him he does threaten her (the whole my way or we're over). He does hurt (maybe not so much physically, but definitely emotionally) her, he does disrespect, intimidate, humiliate, frighten her. Then he brings in a third person to their intimacies and of course he was no help with any explanation, so she submits to that as well thinking it's what he wants and that she didn't really have a choice. It was a total abuse of power, and he in no way treated her submission as a gift that he treasured. From book 1 to book 2, it's actually like 2 completely different characters, just who both happen to have the same name.
Thought 3... After reading the sample (because it starts out really pretty good and quite interesting) I had been expecting to enjoy it to a certain degree. Well his book turned up, and she'd (the author) done a HUGE about face on the character of Tex.... his style of bdsm was not sexy, and he as a character, was NOT caring, appreciative or sexy either, and so I hated it!! His entire behavior was totally the opposite of the way she'd set him up in book 1 and how I was expecting him to be in his own book. If she had intended to write him this way in his own book, why, oh jeez why, did she go to so much trouble to explain him, his lifestyle, his attitudes soooooo differently in the first book????? She may as well have been writing about a totally different person. And that is why it's such a huge wallbanger for me.
Thought 4... The apology just felt way too little too late. And all the Vegas stuff towards the end, just seemed like to me a really cheesy clichéd way of restoring some semblance of power/equality/respect to the heroine after having it totally ripped from her. And as for the "apology" itself - well, the "apology" pissed me right off. A Clayton's apology - the apology you have when you're not having an apology (Aussie & NZ reference that - Claytons was a brand of imitation non-alcoholic alcohol). I hated that it somehow got turned around and she was "sorrying" to him, saying she'd somehow managed to "force" him into his own bad behaviour???!!!! COP OUT. Hated it!! And even after the "apology" it was still all about him, his thoughts I thought were incredibly selfish - about how much more she'd be able to surrender to him, what other stuff she'd be able to allow him to do to her, how many of his fantasies and desires and needs he could get her to satisfy - there was never any thoughts about what he could do FOR HER (like for example after his big day of fantasies - there was no real thankyou for that or "what would like me to do for you?", it was all so very selfishly still all about what she'd do and be for him.
There was no real "romance" to the romance - no real examples of him loving her, nothing that convinced me he really did love her, certainly none of the "treasuring the gift she was giving him" that I'd expected and so wanted to see with Tex's book and him as a hero.
And finally... Perhaps I wouldn't be so down on the book and the hero, if he hadn't been portrayed so differently in the first book. But to have him and the setup for his book set up the way it was and then to have him written so differently, it just really, really ticked me off. The about face on the basic character of Tex is so huge, that it's actually spoiled Shooter now for me too, coz on rereads, all that talking and explaining he does just has me wanting to scream "LIAR!!!" at him, and all his good-guy behaviour towards the women here just have me so incredibly pissed off that his own heroine didn't warrant anywhere near the same caring treatment. He's a total zero in NO WAY worthy of the title hero.
Oh, and wallbanger refers to a book so bad you want it to somewhat loudly and violently meet the nearest wall a time or two (or more).