What do you think?
Rate this book
Wordstruck
The man who made the English language come alive for millions of readers and viewers with 'The Story of English' reveals his own early enchantment with the English language.
'Wordstruck' is the story of Robert MacNeil's unabashed affair with words, from his Halifax childhood awash with intriguing accents to life as a traveling journalist who "delighted in finding pockets of distinctive English, as a botanist is thrilled to discover a new variety of plant."
Each aspect of Robert MacNeil's youthful existence prompted yet another linguistic thrill. Childhood churchgoing "did not provide me with any spiritual awakening ... but it anointed me with language." His mother's passion for the natural world and his father's life as a ship's skipper gave him two more complete vocabularies. And "If you define yourself by the language you acquire as you enter different spheres," MacNeil writes, the absurd language of "cricket was another piece of my self-definition."
'Wordstruck' is the story of Robert MacNeil's unabashed affair with words, from his Halifax childhood awash with intriguing accents to life as a traveling journalist who "delighted in finding pockets of distinctive English, as a botanist is thrilled to discover a new variety of plant."
Each aspect of Robert MacNeil's youthful existence prompted yet another linguistic thrill. Childhood churchgoing "did not provide me with any spiritual awakening ... but it anointed me with language." His mother's passion for the natural world and his father's life as a ship's skipper gave him two more complete vocabularies. And "If you define yourself by the language you acquire as you enter different spheres," MacNeil writes, the absurd language of "cricket was another piece of my self-definition."
230 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1989
10 people are currently reading
182 people want to read
About the author
Robert MacNeil
32 books11 followersRobert Breckenridge Ware MacNeil, OC, was a novelist and former television news anchor and journalist who paired with Jim Lehrer to create The MacNeil/Lehrer Report in 1975. MacNeil wrote several books, many about his career as a journalist, but, since his retirement from NewsHour, MacNeil dabbled in writing novels.
He attended Dalhousie University and later graduated from Carleton University in Ottawa in 1955. He began working in the news field at ITV in London, then for Reuters and then for NBC News as a correspondent in Washington, D.C. and New York City.
On November 22, 1963, MacNeil was covering President Kennedy's visit to Dallas for NBC News. After shots rang out in Dealey Plaza MacNeil, who was with the presidential motorcade, followed crowds running onto the Grassy Knoll (he appears in a photo taken just moments after the assassination). He then headed towards the nearest building and encountered a man leaving the Texas School Book Depository. He asked the man where the nearest telephone was and the man pointed and went on his way. MacNeil later learned the man he encountered at about 12:33 p.m. CST may have been Lee Harvey Oswald. This conclusion was made by historian William Manchester in his book The Death of a President (1967), who believed that Oswald, recounting the day's events to the Dallas police, mistook MacNeil as a Secret Service agent because of his suit, blond crew cut, and press badge (which Oswald apparently mistook for government identification). For his part, MacNeil says "it was possible, but I had no way of confirming that either of the young men I had spoken to was Oswald."
Beginning in 1967, MacNeil covered American and European politics for the BBC and has served as the host for the news discussion show Washington Week in Review. MacNeil rose to fame during his coverage of the Senate Watergate hearings for PBS, which led to an Emmy Award. This helped lead to his most famous news role, where he worked with Jim Lehrer to create The Robert MacNeil Report in 1975. This was later renamed The MacNeil/Lehrer Report and then The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. MacNeil retired on October 20, 1995.
On September 11, 2001, after the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, he called PBS, asking if he could help them with their coverage of the attacks, as he recalled in his autobiography, Looking for My Country: Finding Myself in America. He helped PBS in its coverage of the attacks and the aftermath, interviewing reporters, and giving his thoughts on the attacks. He hosted the PBS television show America at a Crossroads, which ran from April 15-20, 2007.
In the late 1990s, he discussed openly his son's homosexuality, saying it could help other fathers to know how he dealt with the fact in a positive way.
He attended Dalhousie University and later graduated from Carleton University in Ottawa in 1955. He began working in the news field at ITV in London, then for Reuters and then for NBC News as a correspondent in Washington, D.C. and New York City.
On November 22, 1963, MacNeil was covering President Kennedy's visit to Dallas for NBC News. After shots rang out in Dealey Plaza MacNeil, who was with the presidential motorcade, followed crowds running onto the Grassy Knoll (he appears in a photo taken just moments after the assassination). He then headed towards the nearest building and encountered a man leaving the Texas School Book Depository. He asked the man where the nearest telephone was and the man pointed and went on his way. MacNeil later learned the man he encountered at about 12:33 p.m. CST may have been Lee Harvey Oswald. This conclusion was made by historian William Manchester in his book The Death of a President (1967), who believed that Oswald, recounting the day's events to the Dallas police, mistook MacNeil as a Secret Service agent because of his suit, blond crew cut, and press badge (which Oswald apparently mistook for government identification). For his part, MacNeil says "it was possible, but I had no way of confirming that either of the young men I had spoken to was Oswald."
Beginning in 1967, MacNeil covered American and European politics for the BBC and has served as the host for the news discussion show Washington Week in Review. MacNeil rose to fame during his coverage of the Senate Watergate hearings for PBS, which led to an Emmy Award. This helped lead to his most famous news role, where he worked with Jim Lehrer to create The Robert MacNeil Report in 1975. This was later renamed The MacNeil/Lehrer Report and then The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. MacNeil retired on October 20, 1995.
On September 11, 2001, after the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, he called PBS, asking if he could help them with their coverage of the attacks, as he recalled in his autobiography, Looking for My Country: Finding Myself in America. He helped PBS in its coverage of the attacks and the aftermath, interviewing reporters, and giving his thoughts on the attacks. He hosted the PBS television show America at a Crossroads, which ran from April 15-20, 2007.
In the late 1990s, he discussed openly his son's homosexuality, saying it could help other fathers to know how he dealt with the fact in a positive way.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 24 of 24 reviews
May 10, 2014
Robert MacNeil is the co-author of the well-known book and TV series “The Story of English” and the respected co-anchor of the acclaimed MacNeil Lerner Newshour on TV.
This volume contains two themes: one is MacNeil’s wonderful childhood memories of growing up in Halifax Nova Scotia with his family, and the other is the ongoing romance with the English language that he has had his entire life.
I enjoyed this read except for one problem: his idea to combine these two themes is at times more successful than others. As he recounts his younger days, it is easy to become immersed in his childhood and his love of language that grew from his mother’s reading of bedtime stories. She was never a passive reader but read with enthusiasm and delight, dramatizing the voices of different characters and feeling as well as speaking the descriptive passages, conscious at all times of her diction and enunciation. In his inner ear, MacNeil can still hear the cultured musical quality of her voice with the rise and fall of its rhythms and rhymes. It is to his mother that he gives credit for shaping his feel for language.
During this period of the Depression, reading provided affordable, cheap, entertainment. MacNeil’s parents always read and collected books, and since there were few funds for extras, the family read extensively and talked about what they read. Interestingly, MacNeil does not remember any experience in his younger days at school which gave him an appreciation of the joy or pleasure to be found in language. There, they were taught the obligatory English poets in the same manner they were dragged around various museums and historical landmarks, bored, distracted and completely disinterested. It was more through his family, church, or choir that he learned about the pleasure of language. Church, and the Book of Common Prayer did not provide him with any spiritual awakening, but its endless repetition of powerful prose made him conscious of the sound of language and choir practice made him conscious of the importance of diction.
His voracious reading and even the science classroom with its precise verbiage helped him to understand how language can do its magic. But it wasn’t until he went to boarding school at Rothesay Collegiate in New Brunswick and met a teacher he nicknamed “The Duke”, that he was fully initiated into the world of poetry, the value of memorization and the magic of poetic sound. At Rothesay, he substituted German for Latin classes and learned how to repeat text clearly and accurately, opening his ears more consciously to the music of words. In the Cadet Corps he learned the language of command, and how the same words can sound very different when they come from different mouths. It taught him how to be brave with words, something he found less difficult than others.
After failing the exam to enter the Navy, a career his father had always planned for him, he went to Dalhousie University for a year and began dabbling in acting and the theater. It was here that he discovered Shakespeare. At this point the book begins to falter. Up to this point, the two themes have been seamlessly intertwined in the text, but now MacNeil has more difficulty writing what he wants to about his discoveries of language and weave it into his own personal life story.
He gives us a good deal of interesting information about language, the sense and sound of it and what captivated him so thoroughly about listening to it, but at these times, which often take up several pages of text, he is diverted from his own personal story which is left behind. This problem continues as he recounts his experience in radio work with the CBC and later television. There is a short trip to the United States for acting school, but he soon returns to Ottawa and a delayed college education at Carleton University. Again all interspersed with sections on language. From there he is off to London. But the entire flow of his personal life in which I was immersed and held, was interrupted and I had to work to pick it up again.
Towards the end of the book, as he married and began a family, the personal text jumped years ahead. Again, he has given us an excellent analysis and many examples of why he loves the spoken word, but we are left hanging without any sense of his own personal story in those years. One thing he does do well throughout the entire book though, is give us what we need to fully appreciate not only his love of language but also for the feel of books, for good paper and well sewn bindings.
MacNeil shares some interesting personal philosophy about language. First he talks about the reading his mother did when he was young, as the successful groundwork for his love of language. He notes she not only read children’s books to him, but also the classics. Winnie the Pooh, Jungle Book, Peter Pan, Treasure Island and Robin Hood were interspersed with Gulliver’s Travels, Oliver Twist and David Copperfield. In addition, she was always engrossed in the story herself no matter how many times she read it. This, and the way she read, with enthusiasm, clear enunciation and dramatic tone all contributed to the experience. He advises continuing to read to children even after they can read themselves and to include the classics as well as childrens’ stories.
Secondly, he talks about the demise of the spoken word. We seem to define good literature as what is written to be read silently when we should be judging language with our ears as well as our intelligence. He notes that most good English is now assigned to the written word and it is seldom we hear words spoken with any depth of feeling or engagement. Most speakers are reading from an assigned text to which they have little or no connection. They are simply printed words prepared by others that they speak. He mourns what we have lost here, what he considers to be “the weight of the words”.
Thirdly, he speaks of the universality of English, a language that he believes belongs to everyone. MacNeil is not a language snob. He believes English to be the language of the common people, not just the academic. As such, it is sprinkled with slang, idiomatic terms and expressions from different cultures and the peoples who use it. We all speak differently when we are in different circumstances. There are words and language we use in formal occasions, language we use with close friends, family language and there is the talk we use in intimate moments. Language is spoken and written by those who wish to be careful with it, as well as those who don’t care. It is not important to complain about bad language, but it is important to continually pass on your enthusiasm for good language to others, as it is there it will unconsciously take root.
And finally MacNeil warns against immersing ourselves so completely with one or two writers that you forget about all the others. He describes different points in his life when he became obsessed with Shakespeare, Chaucer, Thomas Dylan, T.S. Eliot and Thomas Mann, to the complete exclusion of others. It was only later in his life that he began to realize what he was missing and so cast a wider net, opening himself up to other authors and thinking, “How could I have missed all this?”
An interesting book about the magic of language and how it captured the heart and mind of a small boy holding him firmly into adulthood.
MacNeil’s childhood memories are charming and we get a glimpse of the people, events and literature that shaped his character. As a man who is crazy about “the sound of words, the look of words, the taste of words”, he gets you thinking of things you may never have paid much attention to.
If you like words and language you will appreciate this book.
This volume contains two themes: one is MacNeil’s wonderful childhood memories of growing up in Halifax Nova Scotia with his family, and the other is the ongoing romance with the English language that he has had his entire life.
I enjoyed this read except for one problem: his idea to combine these two themes is at times more successful than others. As he recounts his younger days, it is easy to become immersed in his childhood and his love of language that grew from his mother’s reading of bedtime stories. She was never a passive reader but read with enthusiasm and delight, dramatizing the voices of different characters and feeling as well as speaking the descriptive passages, conscious at all times of her diction and enunciation. In his inner ear, MacNeil can still hear the cultured musical quality of her voice with the rise and fall of its rhythms and rhymes. It is to his mother that he gives credit for shaping his feel for language.
During this period of the Depression, reading provided affordable, cheap, entertainment. MacNeil’s parents always read and collected books, and since there were few funds for extras, the family read extensively and talked about what they read. Interestingly, MacNeil does not remember any experience in his younger days at school which gave him an appreciation of the joy or pleasure to be found in language. There, they were taught the obligatory English poets in the same manner they were dragged around various museums and historical landmarks, bored, distracted and completely disinterested. It was more through his family, church, or choir that he learned about the pleasure of language. Church, and the Book of Common Prayer did not provide him with any spiritual awakening, but its endless repetition of powerful prose made him conscious of the sound of language and choir practice made him conscious of the importance of diction.
His voracious reading and even the science classroom with its precise verbiage helped him to understand how language can do its magic. But it wasn’t until he went to boarding school at Rothesay Collegiate in New Brunswick and met a teacher he nicknamed “The Duke”, that he was fully initiated into the world of poetry, the value of memorization and the magic of poetic sound. At Rothesay, he substituted German for Latin classes and learned how to repeat text clearly and accurately, opening his ears more consciously to the music of words. In the Cadet Corps he learned the language of command, and how the same words can sound very different when they come from different mouths. It taught him how to be brave with words, something he found less difficult than others.
After failing the exam to enter the Navy, a career his father had always planned for him, he went to Dalhousie University for a year and began dabbling in acting and the theater. It was here that he discovered Shakespeare. At this point the book begins to falter. Up to this point, the two themes have been seamlessly intertwined in the text, but now MacNeil has more difficulty writing what he wants to about his discoveries of language and weave it into his own personal life story.
He gives us a good deal of interesting information about language, the sense and sound of it and what captivated him so thoroughly about listening to it, but at these times, which often take up several pages of text, he is diverted from his own personal story which is left behind. This problem continues as he recounts his experience in radio work with the CBC and later television. There is a short trip to the United States for acting school, but he soon returns to Ottawa and a delayed college education at Carleton University. Again all interspersed with sections on language. From there he is off to London. But the entire flow of his personal life in which I was immersed and held, was interrupted and I had to work to pick it up again.
Towards the end of the book, as he married and began a family, the personal text jumped years ahead. Again, he has given us an excellent analysis and many examples of why he loves the spoken word, but we are left hanging without any sense of his own personal story in those years. One thing he does do well throughout the entire book though, is give us what we need to fully appreciate not only his love of language but also for the feel of books, for good paper and well sewn bindings.
MacNeil shares some interesting personal philosophy about language. First he talks about the reading his mother did when he was young, as the successful groundwork for his love of language. He notes she not only read children’s books to him, but also the classics. Winnie the Pooh, Jungle Book, Peter Pan, Treasure Island and Robin Hood were interspersed with Gulliver’s Travels, Oliver Twist and David Copperfield. In addition, she was always engrossed in the story herself no matter how many times she read it. This, and the way she read, with enthusiasm, clear enunciation and dramatic tone all contributed to the experience. He advises continuing to read to children even after they can read themselves and to include the classics as well as childrens’ stories.
Secondly, he talks about the demise of the spoken word. We seem to define good literature as what is written to be read silently when we should be judging language with our ears as well as our intelligence. He notes that most good English is now assigned to the written word and it is seldom we hear words spoken with any depth of feeling or engagement. Most speakers are reading from an assigned text to which they have little or no connection. They are simply printed words prepared by others that they speak. He mourns what we have lost here, what he considers to be “the weight of the words”.
Thirdly, he speaks of the universality of English, a language that he believes belongs to everyone. MacNeil is not a language snob. He believes English to be the language of the common people, not just the academic. As such, it is sprinkled with slang, idiomatic terms and expressions from different cultures and the peoples who use it. We all speak differently when we are in different circumstances. There are words and language we use in formal occasions, language we use with close friends, family language and there is the talk we use in intimate moments. Language is spoken and written by those who wish to be careful with it, as well as those who don’t care. It is not important to complain about bad language, but it is important to continually pass on your enthusiasm for good language to others, as it is there it will unconsciously take root.
And finally MacNeil warns against immersing ourselves so completely with one or two writers that you forget about all the others. He describes different points in his life when he became obsessed with Shakespeare, Chaucer, Thomas Dylan, T.S. Eliot and Thomas Mann, to the complete exclusion of others. It was only later in his life that he began to realize what he was missing and so cast a wider net, opening himself up to other authors and thinking, “How could I have missed all this?”
An interesting book about the magic of language and how it captured the heart and mind of a small boy holding him firmly into adulthood.
MacNeil’s childhood memories are charming and we get a glimpse of the people, events and literature that shaped his character. As a man who is crazy about “the sound of words, the look of words, the taste of words”, he gets you thinking of things you may never have paid much attention to.
If you like words and language you will appreciate this book.
January 8, 2015
I found it hard to stick with this book for some reason, but I did because parts of it were very close to my heart as far as being wordstruck. I skipped over a lot of the inserts of poetry and prose and stuck with him. Clearly this book will only appeal to writer's and people who love to be "wordstruck." I'm always looking for that perfect description or perfect sentence or perfect word.
November 6, 2007
Mostly personal, but with some entertaining observations about language.
March 22, 2022
This is a book that should be on every passionate reader's shelf. The author drapes a memoir on the framework of the books and words that helped shape him. The almost reverence with which he approaches his love of language, is moving in its beauty. This is a book to take your time with, sipping gently from it and listening to the sound of it in your head.
I highly recommend it.
I highly recommend it.
February 10, 2009
I really enjoyed this book. His story seems storybook perfect where he has a naval captain, stern father, books everywhere, loving family, didn't wear his first long pants until he was twelve. ?! Very worthwhile read.
February 12, 2012
Even though it took me a while to finish reading this book, I still enjoyed it. I too have been Wordstruck, so I can easily relate to the feelings of the author. And getting the chance to see how he grew to love the language so much was a nice experience.
September 13, 2007
I read this book in a day. It's too bad he left the MacNeil / Lehrer band. They rocked, in that PBS kind of way.
May 10, 2012
he brings us back to the moment of discovery. the feelings, honesty, and clarity are some of the strong points that make the piece. i can relate to it a lot. an enjoyable read.
May 27, 2023
If you love language and words, Robert MacNeil's childhood listening to his mother read poetry aloud, will strike a cord with you. I also love words and how they sound in poetry. And I can remember my own Mother reading and quoting poetry to the family from my earliest years. This memoir is filled with great photos of his parents and tells the story of his family and his own beginnings from childhood to his distinguished career in broadcast journalism.
March 10, 2019
Connie found this on the give away pile at the gym and brought it home. She liked it a lot and passed it on to me. I particularly liked the part in Halifax since we went there last summer, and RM's progression through many great writers of the English language. Also we in the US do not know much about Canadian life and so that part was enjoyable too.
October 26, 2024
Our 70th Retirement Read Aloud! It was interesting learning about a child growing up in Canada during the 30’s and 40’s. He love of words started early.
June 27, 2019
It was wonderful to read of Robert MacNeil's experiences growing up in Halifax, where I spent my youth. Though his was more my mother's era, the scenery, scents, street names (and the ocean!) are all things I've missed very much since I left the city thirty years ago. I also share the author's love of words, though found the references rather a shrine to his favorite poetry, and classic stories I've never had the patience to read. Actually, I would have been quite happy to do without the tributes to other writers, and just to follow his personal story.
February 29, 2020
A little dry. I skipped over a lot of the longer quotes- I'm just not as moved by some of the passages he loved, and that makes sense: as a woman who is almost fifty years younger, we have different influences. His love of language, of words and reading, and how that shaped him- that I could relate to, and is ultimately why I'm glad I stuck with this book.
October 4, 2015
I averaged my rating for this book. 5 stars for the chapters on his childhood, which in my opinion incorporated cute childhood anecdotes with literary quotes and MacNeil's discoveries about the English language either then or how his childhood influenced later discoveries quite well. Admittedly the book focuses on why he personally loves language, which may or may not mean much in the way of discoveries about the language for well-read readers, but I found it enjoyable. I would give this 3 stars for the chapters on his coming of age and adulthood, which is possibly being generous as I was a little bored and antsy by the end of the book. This is because I found the second half incorporated quotes and discoveries about the English language more clumsily and because it starts to use autobiographical sketch more than anecdotes, which is frankly boring, especially as he skipped over many of the juicy bits. How did he meet and court his wife? What moments made him fall in love with his daughter, his first child who was born slightly before the book ends? I know these things are personal, but it is a memoir, after all. And if he was going to focus so much on his career history, what eventually made him go back broadcasting as a career?
August 1, 2012
This book is SO BORING! Don't read it! I'm a major lover of words - I like terms like logophile and verbivore - and this book was such a disappointment. No wonder I got it for a dollar. The author mostly just babbles on about his family and his childhood in Nova Scotia. There is very little in here about words. What little there is was also quite dull to read. I am not usually one to complain about books, especially books about being in love with language, but this book will bore you to sleep. I should mention that there was one brief good part at the end, but that was not enough to redeem it. I recommend you read anything but this.
May 5, 2014
I enjoy books about words and was surprised to find the parts of this book I like most were the Robert MacNeils memories of growing up. The “words” portions of the book appeared to be inserted and somewhat irrelevant. I did enjoy the story of MacNeil growing up in Nova Scotia, his musing about his father and mother, and his own obsession with the music, cricket, and the theater.
April 29, 2016
Well-crafted and well-written. Insightful about the English language, but can be elitist and, at times, boring. Would I recommend this, but make time to really read and not just skim. MacNeil has a passion for the language and it comes through in this book. If you are a word lover and, especially a poetry aficionado or a connoisseur of English, you will enjoy the read.
October 2, 2016
I really enjoyed this book. The author has such an appreciation for the evolving English language although I'm not sure how he would react to the lovely word 'Seaforth" being replaced by "C4th". I loved how he forces the reader to slow down and listen to the sounds of the word. He even pushes the reader to read aloud for a full reading and auditory experience.
June 27, 2013
For the first time in a long while, a book made my DNF pile.
I got this at a library sale over a decade ago for something like 50 cents, having already heard that it was crushingly boring.
And the sad part is... it is.
After thirty pages, I gave up.
Very sad how immensely dull this is.
I got this at a library sale over a decade ago for something like 50 cents, having already heard that it was crushingly boring.
And the sad part is... it is.
After thirty pages, I gave up.
Very sad how immensely dull this is.
December 22, 2013
Liked learning some bits of journalist's early life, then didn't care much to read it in detail when he talked specific words and not more generally great books.
November 17, 2014
This is a fascinating account of the almost mystical power of words to capture a young boy's--and eventually a man's--imagination. I felt as though MacNeil must be my brother under the skin.
June 2, 2016
My favorite memoir of all-time.
Read
May 8, 2017The first few chapters were interesting, but obviously, not interesting enough to compel me to finish.
Displaying 1 - 24 of 24 reviews