This is the first book on Waldorf Education I've read that gave me a good enough sense of the foundational concepts of Waldorf Education that I could decide whether I agreed with its approach or not. Before reading it, I had a generalized sense that it treats the whole child which must be good, right? Now, although I still like that it moves away from education being a solely intellectual pursuit, many of Steiner's ideas strike me as arcane and fanciful. For example, he categorizes people into four temperaments based on the medieval doctrine of the four humors. While this could potentially be insightful even while based on extremely outmoded science, I do not find the four profiles sufficient to describe the complexity of individual personalities. Many of Steiner's claims do not strike me as true based on my extensive work with children and makes me question the legitimacy of his expertise. At the same time, it is refreshing simply to be exposed to a vastly different take on education from the usual canon.