I've become a bit choosy about my reading within the past year. Since I've committed to writing reviews, I try to choose books that I think I'm more likely to enjoy. (I like to think I'm able to differentiate between quality - it's well executed - and taste - I like it - but I'm not sure that I've managed to excise my tastes well enough to be truly fair). I had high hopes for this one. Unfortunately, I didn't enjoy this book much at all - I seriously contemplating giving up at 25% of the way in. I persevered - I'm not sure how I feel about that choice.
The author did write a few scenes that impacted me on an emotional level - I shed a couple of tears in a couple of spots. So there was success at generating a modicum of investment into the story.
I thought a lot of elements could be improved. Structurally, the sheer number of chapters just didn't make sense. There was also a lot of "preaching" or philosophising that really didn't move the story forward, so I think a good third of the novel could have been cut without sacrificing the plot. I thought the characters could have been significantly better developed - they read as really flat to me, except for Bobby, which was a misstep based on the themes the novel was trying to develop. (For this story, the focus should have been Rod). There were characters that were thrown in that really didn't make a lot of sense. (I felt that Fawn could have been eliminated completely with very little adjustments required to the story). There were a couple of gaping plot holes and sidelines that just didn't make sense.
As far as the writing itself, it was mostly cloying in tone. I thought the author was trying too hard to be poetic and spiritual, which negatively impacted the story. In a work of fiction, the story has to be the driver, which thematic development happening almost outside the awareness of the reader. There were weird uses of expressions, mistakes, and a clunkiness to the writing (especially evident in the dialogue).
Research, research, research. Getting details in the realm of realistic is important. The professional characters (police, therapist, pastor/minister - even the dockhand) were decidedly unprofessional in their conduct. I recognise that these scenes were not central to the story being told (this is not trying to be a police procedural), but it's still important for them to be believable. Furthermore, the accessibility of a psychiatrist or "under sheriff" (which, for the record, I doubt is a real title) stretched credulity.
I also have serious questions about Hannah's theology. Given that spirituality is a central theme of the novel, I did expect that her beliefs would have been clearly conveyed (even indirectly), and that she would have faced a conflict upon confronting the reality she faced. Her character is expressly indicated to have been raised Roman Catholic, and converted to Presbyterianism. (My father was RC, my mother is Presbyterian and I was raised Presbyterian, so I have some familiarity with the tenets of these faiths). The complete lack of a conflict at all was surprising and, I think, a missed opportunity to show the character's growth.
Overall, my impression is that this is a good early draft, with some interesting elements that are worth exploring, but there's still work to be done to polish it including: tightening the pace, character development and realignment, editing out errors, cutting the incidental elements, and filling in critical details to add realism and credibility to plot and characters.
I received a copy of this book through Voracious Readers Only.