What do you think?
Rate this book
The German General Staff and Its Decisions, 1914-1916
Having had a long and distinguished military career, in 1914 General Erich von Falkenhayn assumed the post as chief of the German General Staff in the middle of the First World War. The German position was at a crisis point, the initial plan to win the war by a wide out-flanking movement through Belgium had been foiled; a new plan would have to decided on. In the West, increasing numbers of British troops poured to the Front; in the East, the ambitious team of generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff pushed for reinforcements to finally beat the Russians.
Falkenhayn decided that significant efforts must be made in the Western theatre and came up with a brutal plan to decide the war: he conceived the idea of besieging the historic French city of Verdun in early 1916, of "bleeding it white", as he phrased it. He planned to draw the bulk of the French army into the Verdun salient, thus effectively tying up the French army, and then to methodically destroy them with concentrated artillery fire. The plan failed only by valiant sacrifices and fighting by the French and pressure applied by their allies in other sectors, not least the British effort during the battle of the Somme. Falkenhayn was thereafter removed from his supreme post and would fight on other front in charge of smaller forces.
His memoirs of the period of his command are illuminating and give an insight of what was going on “on the other side of the hill” during the First World War.
Author — General von Falkenhayn, Erich, 1861-1922.
Translator — Anon
Text taken, whole and complete, from the edition published in London, Hutchinson 1919.
Original Page Count – 299 pages.
Falkenhayn decided that significant efforts must be made in the Western theatre and came up with a brutal plan to decide the war: he conceived the idea of besieging the historic French city of Verdun in early 1916, of "bleeding it white", as he phrased it. He planned to draw the bulk of the French army into the Verdun salient, thus effectively tying up the French army, and then to methodically destroy them with concentrated artillery fire. The plan failed only by valiant sacrifices and fighting by the French and pressure applied by their allies in other sectors, not least the British effort during the battle of the Somme. Falkenhayn was thereafter removed from his supreme post and would fight on other front in charge of smaller forces.
His memoirs of the period of his command are illuminating and give an insight of what was going on “on the other side of the hill” during the First World War.
Author — General von Falkenhayn, Erich, 1861-1922.
Translator — Anon
Text taken, whole and complete, from the edition published in London, Hutchinson 1919.
Original Page Count – 299 pages.
333 pages, Hardcover
First published April 11, 2013
8 people are currently reading
15 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
February 23, 2024
Dissertation Read, but I did read or skim the entirety of the book cover to cover so I'm counting it!
German military memoir in the English translation isn't the most scintillating read. I liked Falkenhayn's style of writing in the third person, and I had the impression that he was trying to be fair to his colleagues in the Eastern command who did so much to undermine him, but there's definitely a bit of defensiveness of his decisions in it. He explicitly tries to claim that the Battle of Verdun, his initiative, cost the French more in casualties than it did the Germans, which is hard to take at face value. The nuts and bolts of military unit movements is interesting, and his depiction of the senior strategic discussions are interesting. But hardly a page turning read, and I doubt I'd have spent this much time with it without the need for my dissertation research.
German military memoir in the English translation isn't the most scintillating read. I liked Falkenhayn's style of writing in the third person, and I had the impression that he was trying to be fair to his colleagues in the Eastern command who did so much to undermine him, but there's definitely a bit of defensiveness of his decisions in it. He explicitly tries to claim that the Battle of Verdun, his initiative, cost the French more in casualties than it did the Germans, which is hard to take at face value. The nuts and bolts of military unit movements is interesting, and his depiction of the senior strategic discussions are interesting. But hardly a page turning read, and I doubt I'd have spent this much time with it without the need for my dissertation research.
Displaying 1 of 1 review